Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:39:21.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health technology assessment and priority setting for health policy in Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2004

Per Carlsson
Per Carlsson
Affiliation:
Linköping University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article describes the development of health technology assessment (HTA) in Sweden, its influence on decision making, and its link with priority setting. Sweden has a well established governmental HTA body, the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU), and an increasing number of regional/local HTA organizations. HTA has had an impact on clinical practice and is used to some extent in policy decisions. Several initiatives have now been taken to develop processes for open priority setting of health-care services. With the establishment of a new agency to undertake reimbursement decisions on pharmaceuticals, and greater patient and public involvement in decision making, it seems inevitable that HTA will play a more important role in priority setting in the near future.

Keywords

Health technology assessmentPriority settingHealth economicsPolicy analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 44 - 54
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anell A, Svarvar P. 1998 Health economics and therapeutical recommendations: Attitudes in Swedish drug committees. Lund: IHE working paper; 4 (in Swedish).
Bos M, Carlsson P, van der Kooij S, et al. 1996 Technology assessment and coverage policy: The case of invasive cardiology therapy in five European countries. Barcelona: Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment;
Britton M, Jonsson E. 2002 Impact of health technology assessments: Some experiences of SBU. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 18: 1073– 1080.Google Scholar
Brorsson B, Wall S. 1984 Assessment of medical technology: Problems and methods. Stockholm: The Medical Research Council; (in Swedish).
Carlsson P, Hultin H, Törnwall J. 1998 The early experiences of a national system for the identification and assessment of emerging health care technologies in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 14: 687– 694.Google Scholar
Carlsson P, Tiselius H-G. 1989 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Medical, technical, economic and policy implications. Scand J Urol Nephrol. (Suppl 122): 1– 128.Google Scholar
Carlsson P, Garpenby P, Bonair A. 1991 Can health care be managed? On diffusion and control of medical technology. Linköping: Linköping University: CMT Report; 5 (in Swedish).
Drummond M, Jefferson T. 1996 for the BMJ Working Party. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ. 313: 275– 283.Google Scholar
Jönsson B. 1997 Economic evaluation of medical technologies in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 45: 597– 604.Google Scholar
Lindholm B. 1973 A socioeconomic analysis of polio vaccine. Stockholm: Swedish Medical Research Council, Report 1; (in Swedish).
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. 1993 No easy choices: The difficult priorities of health care. Stockholm: Fritzes Förlag, SOU; 3.
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. 1996 Need and health care resources. Stockholm: Fritzes Förlag, SOU; 163 (in Swedish).
The Swedish National Audit Office (RRV). 2002 To influence without steering: On information activities by governmental health care agencies. Stockholm: Swedish National Audit Office; 4 (in Swedish).
Skargren E. 1998 Evaluation of physical exercise, physiotherapy and chiropractic in management of back pain. (dissertation) Linköping: Linköping University;
National Board of Health and Welfare. 2001 Guidelines on coronary heart disease. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare; (in Swedish).
National Board of Health and Welfare. 2002 The value of health care. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare; (in Swedish).
Stocking B. 1991 Factors affecting the diffusion of three medical technology in European community countries and Sweden. London: The King's Fund;