Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:23:59.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geographic Variation in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in Connecticut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Anthony P. Polednak
Anthony P. Polednak
Affiliation:
Connecticut Department of Health Services
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Connecticut there was considerable variation by town of residence in the proportions of patients diagnosed in 1985–1988 receiving transurethral resection only, prostatectomy, and irradiation (without surgery) for local-stage prostate cancer and receiving endocrine surgery for late-stage prostate cancer. Age and socioeconomic variables were examined as predictors of this variation.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Spring 1993 , pp. 304 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bennett, C. L., Greenfield, S., Arnow, H., et al. Patterns of care related to age of men with prostate cancer. Cancer, 1991, 67, 2633–41.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Consensus Development Panel (U.S. National Institutes of Health). The management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 258, 2727–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hanks, G. E.External beam radiation for localized prostate cancer. NCI Monographs, 1988, 7, 75–84.Google Scholar
4.Henriksson, P. & Stege, R. Cost comparison of parenteral estrogen and conventional hormonal treatment in patients with prostatic cancer. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991, 220–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Karjalainen, S.Geographical variation in cancer patient survival in Finland: Chance, confounding, or effect of treatment. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1990, 44, 210–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Murphy, G. P.Prostate cancer: Continuing progress. CA, 1981, 31, 97–110.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Perez, C. A., Pilepich, M. V., Garcia, D., et al. Definitive radiation therapy in carcinoma of the prostate localized to the pelvis: Experience at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology. NCI Monographs, 1988, 7, 85–94.Google Scholar
8.Piantidosi, S., Byar, D. B., & Gail, M. H.Screening geographic areas for unusual survival experience or stage at diagnosis with application to breast and colon cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1985, 75, 269–75.Google Scholar
9.Ragland, K. E., Selvin, S., & Merrill, D. W.Black-white differences in stage-specific cancer survival: Analysis of seven selected sites. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1991, 133, 672–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Ries, L. A. G., Hankey, B. F., & Edwards, B. K.Cancer statistics review, 1973–1987. NIH Publication No. 90–2789. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Public Health Service, 1989.Google Scholar
11.Schmidt, J. D., Mettlin, C. J., Natarajan, N., et al. Trends in patterns of care for prostatic cancer, 1974–1983: Results of surveys by the American College of Surgeons. Journal ofUrology, 1982, 136, 416–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Shambaugh, E.Stat bite: Accuracy of SEER data. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1991, 83, 1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1980 Census of the Population, vol. I. Characteristics of the Population, Chapter D, detailed population characteristics, part 8. Connecticut (PC80-1D8): U.S. Department of Commerce, 10 1983.Google Scholar
14.Whitmore, W. F.The rationale and results of ablative surgery for prostatic cancer. Cancer, 1963, 16, 1119–26.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Whitmore, W. F.Locoregional prostatic cancer: Advances in management. Cancer, 1990, 65, 667–74.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Wyshak, G., Burdick, E., & Mosteller, F.Technology assessment in the Connecticut Tumor Registry. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991, 7, 129–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed