Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:21:52.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Assistive Devices after a Course in Joint Protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Ulla Nordenskiöld
Ulla Nordenskiöld
Affiliation:
Sahlgrenska Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study assessed a joint protection education program and investigated the costs and effects of assistive devices. Fifty-three women with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis, whose ages ranged from 29 to 65 years, attended a standardized joint protection course (13 hours). A self-report questionnaire was constructed listing the most common devices, and the subjects were asked to check which devices they had received, which ones they used and did not use, and why. Pain during activities of daily living and when using assistive devices was measured using the visual analogue scale. Results show that the subjects reported great benefits from the joint protection course, assistive devices, and wrist orthosis. The women had tried 663 devices, 91 % of which were still being used. Pain decreased significantly (p < .001) when using assistive devices. The utility of 11 devices at a cost of SEK 1,683 per person can be described as increased capacity and ability to work at home, work outside the home, and perform leisure activities with less pain.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Spring 1994 , pp. 293 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Althoff, B., & Nordenskiold, U.Joint protection — An alleviating and active way of living, 5th revised ed.Course booklet and 2 slide series. (In Swedish.) Stockholm: The Swedish Association Against Rheumatism, 1991.Google Scholar
2.Benktzon, M.Designing for our future selves: The Swedish experience. Applied Ergonomics, 1993, 24, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Berglund, K.Inflammatoriska reumatiska sjukdomar. (In Swedish.) Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1979.Google Scholar
4.Berglund, K., & Persson, L. O.Dimensions of psychological adjustment to illness in rheumatoid arthritis. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1990, 19, 311–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Berglund, K., Persson, L. O., & Brattström, M. Effects of group counselling for rheumatoid arthritis patients on measures of psychological adjustment to illness. InBalint, G., et al. (eds.), Rheumatology, State of the Art. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1992, 432–35.Google Scholar
6.Brattström, M. The patient, her disease, and her environment. How to make life easier for the rheumatic patient. In Balint, G., et al. (eds.), Rheumatology, State of the Art. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1992, 70–76.Google Scholar
7.Chamberlain, A., & Thornley, G.Evaluation of aids and equipment for the bath. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 1981, 20, 38–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Cordery, J. C.Joint protection — A responsibility of the occupational therapist. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1965, 19, 243–48.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Dequeker, J., & Abbott, J. R.Allied health professionals in rheumatology—Patient education in arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases. Clinical Rheumatology, 1990, 9, 165–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Donovan, J. L., Blake, D. R., & Fleming, W. G.The patient is not a blank sheet: Lay beliefs and their relevance to patient education. British Journal of Rheumatology, 1989, 28, 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hollings, E. M., & Haworth, R. J. Supply and use of aids and appliances. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1978, 10, 336–39.Google Scholar
12.Huskisson, E. C. Measurement of pain. Lancet, 1974, 11 9, 1127–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kielhofner, G.A model of human occupation. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1985.Google Scholar
14.Lindroth, Y., Bauman, A., Barnes, C., et al. A controlled evaluation of arthritis education. British Journal of Rheumatology, 1989, 28, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Lorig, K., & Fries, J. F.The arthritis helpbook. A tested self-management program for coping with your arthritis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1988.Google Scholar
16.Meyer, A.The philosophy of occupational therapy. Archives of Occupational Therapy, 1922, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
17.Nordenskiöld, U.Elastic wrist orthoses —Reduction of pain and increase in grip force for women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care and Research, 1990, 3, 158–62.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Nordenskiöld, U., & Grimby, G.Grip force in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia and in healthy subjects. A study with Grippit instrument. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1993, 22, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Nordenskiöld, U., Althoff, B., & Hansen, A. M.Joint protection—An alleviating and active way of living, 4th ed.Manual. Stockholm: The Swedish Association Against Rheumatism, 1993.Google Scholar
20.Nya hälso-och sjukvårdslagen (for Sweden), 1982.Google Scholar
21.Palmer, P., & Simons, J.Joint protection. A critical review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1991, 54, 453–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Robinson, I.The rehabilitation of patients with long-term physical impairments: the social context of professional roles. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1988, 2, 339–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Smith, E. M., et al. Role of the finger flexors in rheumatoid deformities of the metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1964, 7, 467–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Steinbrocker, O., Traeger, C. H., & Batterman, R. C.Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA, 1949, 140, 659–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.World Health Organization: International classification of impairment, disabilities and handicaps. A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease (ICIDH). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1980.Google Scholar
26.Yerxa, E.Seeking a relevent, ethical, and realistic way of knowing for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1991, 3, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar