Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:24:20.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic impact of the use of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2021

Alvine Fansi Open the ORCID record for Alvine Fansi [Opens in a new window] ,
Angela Ly ,
Julie Mayrand ,
Maggy Wassef ,
Aldanie Rho  and
Sylvie Beauchamp
Alvine Fansi
Affiliation:
Health and Social Care Technology Intervention Assessment Unit (HSCTIAU), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Ouest-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, 3830, ave. Lacombe, Montréal, QuébecH3T 1M5, Canada Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Canada
Angela Ly
Affiliation:
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Ouest-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, 3830, ave. Lacombe, Montréal, QuébecH3T 1M5, Canada
Julie Mayrand
Affiliation:
Health and Social Care Technology Intervention Assessment Unit (HSCTIAU), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Ouest-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, 3830, ave. Lacombe, Montréal, QuébecH3T 1M5, Canada
Maggy Wassef
Affiliation:
Health and Social Care Technology Intervention Assessment Unit (HSCTIAU), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Ouest-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, 3830, ave. Lacombe, Montréal, QuébecH3T 1M5, Canada
Aldanie Rho
Affiliation:
Faculté de Médecine de l'Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050 Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
Sylvie Beauchamp
Affiliation:
Health and Social Care Technology Intervention Assessment Unit (HSCTIAU), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Ouest-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, 3830, ave. Lacombe, Montréal, QuébecH3T 1M5, Canada Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) is a validated, risk-adjusted database for improving the quality and security of surgical care. ACS NSQIP can help participating hospitals target areas that need improvement. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature analyzing the economic impact of using NSQIP. This paper also provides an estimation of annual cost savings following the implementation of NSQIP and quality improvement (QI) activities in two hospitals in Quebec.

Methods

In June 2018, we searched in seven databases, including PubMed, Embase, and NHSEED for economic evaluations based on NSQIP data. Contextual NSQIP databases from two hospitals were collected and analyzed. A cost analysis was conducted from the hospital care perspective, comparing complication costs before and after 1 year of the implementation of NSQIP and QI activities. The number and the cost of complications are measured. Costs are presented in 2018 Canadian dollars.

Results

Out of 1,612 studies, 11 were selected. The level of overall evidence was judged to be of moderate to high quality. In general, data showed that, following the implementation of NSQIP and QI activities, a significant decrease in complications and associated costs was observed, which improved with time. In the cost analysis of contextual data, the reduction in complication costs outweighed the cost of implementing NSQIP. However, this cost analysis did not take into account the costs of QI activities.

Conclusions

NSQIP improves complication rates and associated costs when QI activities are implemented.

Keywords

Hospital costsPostoperative complications/economicsSurgical proceduresOperative/economicsQuality improvementQuality indicatorsHealth care
Type
Assessment
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , 2021 , e38
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Khuri, SF. Quality, advocacy, healthcare policy, and the surgeon. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:641–9. Epub 2002/09/20. PubMed PMID: 12238818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Surgeons. Searching for NSQIP Participating Hospitals: American College of Surgeons; 2019. Available from: https://www.facs.org/search/nsqip-participantsGoogle Scholar
Hammermeister, K. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: Learning from the past and moving to the future. Am J Surg. 2009;198:S69–73. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glanville, J, Kaunelis, D, Mensinkai, S. How well do search filters perform in identifying economic evaluations in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:522–9. Epub 2009/10/23. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990523. PubMed PMID: 19845982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thanh, NX, Baron, T, Litvinchuk, S. An economic evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) in Alberta, Canada. Ann Surg. 2018 [Preprint].Google Scholar
Drummond, M, O'Brien, B, Stoddart, G, Torrance, G. Méthodes d'évaluation économique des programmes de santé. 2nd ed. Paris, France: Economica; 1998.Google Scholar
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Tools & Checklists (Cohort study) 2017 [2017-10-30]. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklistsGoogle Scholar
Dempster, L. Dollars and sense: translating your program's worth. Conference presentation. British Columbia: Vancouver Coastal Health Authority; 2014. Available from: http://www.acsnsqip.org/nsqippublicdocs/service?pubid=2014confpres&docid=49461Google Scholar
Levy, AR, Szabo, SM, Lozano-Ortega, G, Lloyd-Smith, E, Leung, V, Lawrence, R et al. Incidence and costs of Clostridium difficile infections in Canada. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2:ofv076. Epub 2015/07/21. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv076. PubMed PMID: 26191534; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4503917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian institute for Health Information. Patient cost estimator: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2019 [updated 2018-10-25]. Available from: https://www.cihi.ca/en/patient-cost-estimatorGoogle Scholar
Hollenbeak, CS, Boltz, MM, Wang, L, Schubart, J, Ortenzi, G, Zhu, J et al. Cost-effectiveness of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 2011;254:619–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillamondegui, OD, Gunter, OL, Hines, L, Martin, BJ, Gibson, W, Clarke, PC et al. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:709–6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henke, PK, Kubus, J, Englesbe, MJ, Harbaugh, C, Campbell, DA. A statewide consortium of surgical care: A longitudinal investigation of vascular operative procedures at 16 hospitals. Surgery 2010;148:883–92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osborne, NH, Nicholas, LH, Ryan, AM, Thumma, JR, Dimick, JB. Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 2015;313:496–504. https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazaure, HS, Martin, M, Yoon, JK, Wren, SM. Long-term results of a postoperative pneumonia prevention program for the inpatient surgical ward. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:914–8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNelis, J, Castaldi, M. “The National Surgery Quality Improvement Project” (NSQIP): A new tool to increase patient safety and cost efficiency in a surgical intensive care unit. Patient Saf Surg. 2014;8:19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umer, A, Shapiro, DS, Hughes, C, Ross-Richardson, C, Ellner, S. The use of an indwelling catheter protocol to reduce rates of postoperative urinary tract infections. Conn Med. 2016;80:197–203.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, K, Hobson, D, Cardamone, M, Demski, R, Berenoltz, S, Wick, E. Building a business case for colorectal surgery quality improvement. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:e83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828d97c9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiele, RH, Rea, KM, Turrentine, FE, Friel, CM, Hassinger, TE, Goudreau, BJ et al. Standardization of care: Impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:430–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.042CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceppa, E, House, M, Pitt, H, Zyromski, N, Schmidt, C, Nakeeb, A, et al. . Reducing surgical site infections in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14:96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00510.xGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fansi et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S5

Download Fansi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 92.5 KB