Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:15:00.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS AND DIAGNOSTIC TESTING: AN ILLUSTRATIVE CASE STUDY APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2013

Sabina Sanghera ,
Rosanna Orlando  and
Tracy Roberts
Sabina Sanghera
Affiliation:
Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham
Rosanna Orlando
Affiliation:
Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham
Tracy Roberts
Affiliation:
Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to present a clear process of synthesizing test accuracy data when conducting economic evaluations of diagnostic tests for health technology assessment (HTA) assessors and health economists.

Methods: We appraised the methods advocated for using diagnostic test accuracy data in economic evaluations. We used a case study of fetal anemia in which data from a screening test are used in combination with a confirmatory test.

Results: We developed a step-by-step guide and consider two scenarios: when data on test accuracy from several studies are based on (i) the same test threshold for positivity and (ii) different test thresholds.

Conclusions: We conclude that each approach has its strengths and limitations. We show that the optimal operating point of the test should be identified to determine the true cost-effectiveness of the test. We advocate that these issues require a multidisciplinary team of health economists, decision modelers and statisticians.

Keywords

Economic evaluationDiagnostic testsSensitivity and specificityROC curve
Type
METHODS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 53 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Trikalinos, TA, Siebert, U, Lau, J. Decision-analytic modeling to evaluate benefits and harms of medical tests: uses and limitations. Med Decis Making. 2009;29:E22–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Dukic, V, Gatsonis, C. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy assessment studies with varying number of thresholds. Biometrics. 2003;59:936–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Novielli, N, Cooper, NJ, Abrams, KR, Sutton, AJ. How is evidence on test performance synthesized for economic decision models of diagnostic tests? A systematic appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK since 1997. Value Health. 2010;13:952–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Laking, G, Lord, J, Fischer, A. The economics of diagnosis. Health Econ. 2006;15:1109–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Metz, CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978;8:283–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Phelps, CE, Mushlin, AI. Focusing technology assessment using medical decision theory. Med Decis Making. 1988;8:279–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Altman, DG, Bland, JM. Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994;308:1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Mandrekar, JN, Mandrekar, SJ. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine using SAS Software. [online] 2005 [cited 01.12.10]. Available from: www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/211-30.pdf.Google Scholar
9.Zweig, MH, Campbell, G. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993;4:561–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Meads, CA, Cnossen, JS, Juarez-Garcia, A, et al.Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12:1–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Whiting, P, Westwood, M, Bojke, L, et al.Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tests for the diagnosis and investigation of urinary tract infection in children: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:1–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Chen, L, Liao, C, Chang, S, Lai, HC, Chen, TH. Cost-effectiveness analysis for determining the optimal cut-off of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for population-based colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen. 2007;14:191–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Sutton, AJ, Cooper, NJ, Goodacre, S, Stevenson, M. Integration of meta-analysis and economic decision modeling for evaluating diagnostic tests. Med Decis Making. 2008;28:650–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Kumar, S, Regan, F. Management of pregnancies with RhD alloimmunisation. BMJ. 2005;330:1255–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Bullock, R, Martin, WL, Coomarasamy, A, Kilby, MD. Prediction of fetal anemia in pregnancies with red-cell alloimmunization: comparison of middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity and amniotic fluid OD450. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:331–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Leeflang, MMG, Deeks, JJ, Gatsonis, C, Bossuyt, PM; Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:889–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Mari, G, Deter, RL, Robert, L, et al.Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anaemia due to maternal red cell alloimmunisation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Pretlove, SJ, Fox, CE, Khan, KS, Kilby, MD. Noninvasive methods of detecting fetal anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2009;116:1558–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Bricker, L, Garcia, J, Henderson, J, et al.Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's view. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4:1–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Office for National Statistics. Infant mortality rates, England and Wales, 1975–2000. [online] 2005 [cited 25.08.10] Available from: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/xsdataset.asp?vlnk=4288&More=Y.Google Scholar
21.Schumacher, B, Moise, KJ. Fetal Transfusion for red blood cell alloimmunisation in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:137–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Varney, SJ, Guest, JL. The annual cost of blood transfusions in the UK. Transfus Med. 2003;13:205–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Weisz, B, Rosenbaum, O, Chayen, B, et al.Outcome of severely anaemic fetuses treated by intrauterine transfusions. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:F201–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Sanghera Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Sanghera Supplementary Material(File)
File 32.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sanghera Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Sanghera Supplementary Material(File)
File 63.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sanghera Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Sanghera Supplementary Material(File)
File 53.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sanghera Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Sanghera Supplementary Material(File)
File 38.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sanghera Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Sanghera Supplementary Material(File)
File 29.2 KB