Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T11:15:56.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Definiendo el valor de las tecnologías sanitarias en Latino-América: desarrollo de marcos de valor para informar la priorización de recursos sanitarios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2019

Andres Pichon-Riviere ,
Sebastian Garcia-Marti ,
Wija Oortwijn ,
Federico Augustovski  and
Laura Sampietro-Colom
Andres Pichon-Riviere*
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Sebastian Garcia-Marti
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Wija Oortwijn
Affiliation:
Radboud university medical centre, the Netherlands
Federico Augustovski
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Laura Sampietro-Colom
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: Andres Pichon-Riviere (IECS), E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Resumen

Objetivos

El reciente desarrollo de marcos de valor responde a una demanda por hacer más explícito e inclusivo el proceso de toma de decisiones sobre asignación de recursos sanitarios. El objetivo del Foro de Políticas en Latino América 2018 de Health Technology Assessment International fue explorar las experiencias internacionales y discutir la potencial aplicación de marcos de valor en la región.

Métodos

Este manuscrito está basado en un documento base y en las presentaciones y discusiones mantenidas por los miembros del Foro (43 participantes, 12 países) durante el Foro del 2018.

Resultados

Los participantes coincidieron en que un proceso de evaluación y toma de decisión basado en marcos de valor más inclusivos y abarcativos podría mejorar la efectividad, eficiencia, sustentabilidad y equidad; promover la transparencia y una evaluación más completa de las tecnologías, mejorar la rendición de cuentas de las decisiones y la participación de actores. Se identificaron como criterios esenciales para ser incluidos en marcos de valor en la región a la carga de enfermedad y severidad de la condición, la efectividad y seguridad de la tecnología, la calidad de la evidencia, la costo-efectividad e impacto presupuestario. Los potenciales desafíos para su implementación identificados incluyeron la escasez de recursos humanos y las demoras en el proceso de evaluación que se podrían producir.

Conclusiones

Los participantes remarcaron que los próximos pasos deberían ser identificar procesos y metodologías apropiadas, adaptadas al contexto de cada país, para facilitar la aplicación de marcos de valor y mejorar el vínculo entre la evaluación y la toma de decisiones.

Type
Policy
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , 2019 , pp. 69 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Este documento es la version en español del manuscrito: “Defining the Value of Health Technologies in Latin America: Developments in Value Frameworks to Inform the Allocation of Health Care Resources.” The English translation of this article is available here: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462319000072

References

Referencias

1.Dmytraczenko, T, Torres, FM, Aten, A (2015) Universal health coverage policies in Latin America and the Caribbean. Toward universal health coverage and equity in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evidence from selected countries. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, p. 53–80.Google Scholar
2.Atun, R, de Andrade, LO, Almeida, G, et al. (2015) Health-system reform and universal health coverage in Latin America. Lancet 385, 1230–1247.10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61646-9Google Scholar
3.Cotlear, D, Gómez-Dantés, O, Knaul, F, et al. (2015) Overcoming social segregation in health care in Latin America. Lancet 385, 1248–1259.Google Scholar
4.Terwindt, F, Rajan, D, Soucat, A (2015) Priority-setting for national health policies, strategies and plans. In: Schmets, G, Rajan, D, Kadandale, S, eds. Strategizing national health in the 21st century: A handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); p. 71.Google Scholar
5.World Health Organization (WHO) (2014) Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage. Final report of the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112671/1/9789241507158_eng.pdf?ua=1.Google Scholar
6.INAHTA Glosary (2017): www.inahta.org. Accessed August 2nd, 2018.Google Scholar
7.Oortwijn, W, Sampietro-Colom, L, Habens, F (2017) Developments in value frameworks to inform the allocation of healthcare resources. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 33, 323–329.Google Scholar
8.Sixty-Seventh World Health Assembly (2014) Health intervention and technology assessment in support of universal health coverage. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/162870/A67_R23-en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
9.Martí S, Garcia, Riviere A, Pichon, Augustovski, F, on behalf of HTAi Policy Forum (2018) Defining the value of health technology in Latin America: developments in value frameworks to inform the allocation of health care resources. Background paper. https://htai.org/policy-forum/latin-america-policy-forum/background-papers/.Google Scholar
10.Neumann, PJ, Willke, RJ, Garrison, LP Jr (2018) A health economics approach to US value assessment frameworks—introduction: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report. Value Health 21, 119–123.10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.012Google Scholar
11.HTAi - Health Technology Assessment International (2018) HTAi policy forum series. https://htai.org/policy-forum/.Google Scholar
12.Pichon-Riviere, A, Soto, N, Augustovski, F, Sampietro-Colom, L (2018) Stakeholder involvement in the health technology assessment process in Latin America. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 34, 248–253.Google Scholar
13.Pichon-Riviere, A, Soto, NC, Augustovski, FA, García Martí, S, Sampietro-Colom, L (2018) [Health technology assessment for decision-making in Latin America: good practice principles]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 41, e138.Google Scholar
14.Oortwijn, W, on behalf of the HTAi Global Policy Forum (2017) From theory to action: Developments in value frameworks to inform the allocation of health care resources. Background paper. https://htai.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/HTAi_Policy_Forum_2017_Background_Paper.pdf.Google Scholar
15.Chatham House (2016) Chatham house rule. London, UK: The Royal Institute of International Affairs. https://www.chathamhouse.org/about/chatham-house-rule.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pichon-Riviere et al. supplementary material

Pichon-Riviere et al. supplementary material 1

Download Pichon-Riviere et al. supplementary material(File)
File 30.8 KB