Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T07:03:12.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COSTS OF INFORMAL CARE FOR PATIENTS IN ADVANCED HOME CARE: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2004

Agneta Andersson ,
John Carstensen ,
Lars-Åke Levin  and
Bengt Göran Emtinger
Agneta Andersson
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet
John Carstensen
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet
Lars-Åke Levin
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet
Bengt Göran Emtinger
Affiliation:
The National Board of Health and Welfare
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Several studies have sought to analyze the cost-effectiveness of advanced home care and home rehabilitation. However, the costs of informal care are rarely included in economic appraisals of home care. This study estimates the cost of informal care for patients treated in advanced home care and analyses some patient characteristics that influence informal care costs.

Methods: During one week in October 1995, data were collected on all 451 patients in advanced home care in the Swedish county of Östergötland. Costs were calculated by using two models: one including leisure time, and one excluding leisure time. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with costs of informal care.

Results: Seventy percent of the patients in the study had informal care around the clock during the week investigated. The patients had, on average, five formal care visits per week, each of which lasted for almost half an hour. Thus, the cost of informal care constituted a considerable part of the cost of advanced home care. When the cost of leisure time was included, the cost of informal care was estimated at SEK 5,880 per week per patient, or twice as high as total formal caregiver costs. When leisure time was excluded, the cost of informal care was estimated at SEK 3,410 per week per patient, which is still 1.2 times higher than formal caregiver costs (estimated at SEK 2,810 per week per patient). Informal care costs were higher among patients who were men, who were younger, who had their own housing, and who were diagnosed with cancer.

Conclusions: Studies of advanced home care that exclude the cost of informal care substantially underestimate the costs to society, regardless of whether or not the leisure time of the caregiver is included in the calculations.

Keywords

Informal careAdvanced home careHome rehabilitationCost
Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 656 - 663
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson A, Levin L-Å, Emtinger BG. 2002 The economic burden of informal care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 18: 46- 54.Google Scholar
Brouwer WBF, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH. 1998 Patient and informal caregiver time in cost-effectiveness analysis. A response to the recommendations of the Washington panel. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 14: 505- 513.Google Scholar
Brouwer WBF, Van Exel NJA, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH. 1999 The valuation of informal care in economic appraisal. A consideration of individual choice and societal costs of time. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 15: 147- 160.Google Scholar
Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). 1997 Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. 2nd ed. Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA)
Commonwealth of Australia. 1995 Guidelines for the pharmaceutical industry on preparation of submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: Including economic analyses. Canberra: Department of Health and Community Services
Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ. 1997 Methods for the evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications
The County Council of Östergötland (Emtinger BG.). 1996 Vå rda och vå rdas hemma. Kartlå ggning av LAH – den lasarettsanslutna hemsjukvå rden i Östergötland. Beställarstaben för hälso-och sjukvå rd. [Caring for and being cared for at home. Mapping LAH-general associated home health care in Östergötland.] (In Swedish). Linköping: The County Council of Östergötland
Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russel LB, Weinstein MC, eds. 1996 Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Health Services Utilization and Research Commission (HSURC). 1996 The cost-effectiveness of home care. A rigorous review of the literature. Background paper. Saskatoon: HSURC
World Health Organization. 1980 International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 9th revision, ICD9. Geneva: World Health Organization
Johannesson M. 1997 Avoiding double-counting in pharmacoeconomic studies. Pharmacoeconomics. 11: 385- 388.Google Scholar
Johansson L. 1991 Caring for the next of kin. On informal care of the elderly in Sweden. (Thesis no. 330). Socialmedicinska institutionen, Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell International
Liljas B. 1998 How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 13 (Pt 1) 1- 7.Google Scholar
Luce BR, Manning WG, Siegel JE, Lipscomb J. 1996 Estimating costs in cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russel LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press
McDaid D. 2001 Estimating the costs of informal care for people with Alzheimer's disease: Methodological and practical challenges. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 16: 400- 405.Google Scholar
Muurinen J. 1986 The economics of informal care. Labour market effects in the National Hospice study. Med Care. 24: 1007- 1017.Google Scholar
Official Statistics of Sweden. 1999 Statistical Reports No. AM 61. 1999. Stockholm
Stommel M, Given CW, Given BA. 1993 The cost of cancer home care to families. Cancer. 71: 1867- 1874.Google Scholar
Sugden R, Williams A. 1978 The principles of practical cost-benefit analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press
The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). 1999 Advanced home care and home rehabilitation: Reviewing the scientific evidence on costs and effects. Report no. 1999:146. (In Swedish, summary in English). Stockholm: SB Offset AB
Weisbrod BA. 1961 The valuation of human capital. J Pol Econ. 69: 425- 436.Google Scholar