Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:39:45.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cost-Effectiveness of Present Programs for Detection of Asymptomatic Hypertension in Relation to the Severity of Hypertension Andproteinuric Hypertension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Marion Hall
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Doris Campbell
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen

Abstract

Proteinuric hypertension is an important cause of maternal and perinatal mortality. Eclampsia cannot always be prevented. The likelihood of identifying a new case of proteinuric hypertension at any particular visit is very low using traditional antenatal care schedules, and care could be focused on women at higher risk.

Type
Screening for Asymptomatic Pregnancy Hypertension
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bryce, R., Cvitanovich, A., Hogan, J., et al. Perceptions of antenatal care. Proceedings of 4th Australian Congress in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perth, 75, 1987.Google Scholar
2.Campbell, D. M., MacGillivray, I., & Carrhill, R.Pre-eclampsia in a second pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985, 92, 131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cole, S. K., Hey, E. N., & Thomson, A. M.Classifying perinatal death: An obstetric approach, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986, 93, 1204–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Davey, D. A., & MacGillivray, I. The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. In Sharp, F. & Symonds, E. M. (eds.), Hypertension in pregnancy. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, 1987.Google Scholar
5.Drummond, M. Review of evaluative studies of intensive care for very low birthweight infants in Scotland. Economic aspects. In Kaminski, M.Breart, G.Buekens, P. et al. (eds.), Perinatal care delivery systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, 265–79.Google Scholar
6.Flint, C., & Poulengeris, P.The “Know your midwife” report. London: C. Flint, 49, Peckarman's Wood, London, SE26 6RZ, 1987.Google Scholar
7.Hall, M. H., Chng, P. K., & MacGilIivray, I.Is routine antenatal care worthwhile? Lancet, 1980, ii, 7880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hall, M. H., Maclntyre, S., & Porter, M.Antenatal care assessed. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
9.MacGillivray, I.Pre-eclampsiæ The hypertensive disease of pregnancy. Eastbourne, Philadelphia, Toronto: W. B. Saunders Co. Ltd., 1983, 176–82.Google Scholar
10.Marteau, T. M.The psychological costs of screening. British Medical Journal, 1989, 299, 527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Redman, C.Eclampsia still kills. British Medical Journal, 1988, 296, 1209–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Redman, C. Screening for pre-eclampsia. In Enkin, M. & Chalmers, I. (eds.), Effectiveness and satisfaction in antenatal care. London: Spastics International Medical Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
13. Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales, 1982–1984. Department of Health Report on Health, and Social Subjects, 34. HMSO, London, 1989.Google Scholar
14.Rosenberg, K., & Twaddle, S.Screening and surveillance of pregnancy hypertension — An economic approach to the use of day care. In Hall, M. (ed.), Baillere's Clinical Obstetric and Gynaecology, 1990; 4, 89107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Scottish Stillbirth and Death Report, 1988 (1989). Information and Statistics Division, Common Services Agency, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
16.Wallenburg, H. C. S. Detecting hypertensive disease in pregnancy. In Chalmers, I.Enkin, M., & Keirse, M.j.n.c. (eds.), Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 382402.Google Scholar