Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:43:09.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communication AIDS for the Speech Impaired: Cost and Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Assessment Programs Provided by Speciaiist Communication Aids Centers in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Keith Tolley ,
Brenda Leese ,
Ken Wright ,
Sue Hennessy ,
Corinne Rowley ,
Janet Stowe  and
Ann Chamberlain
Keith Tolley
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Brenda Leese
Affiliation:
University of York
Ken Wright
Affiliation:
University of York
Sue Hennessy
Affiliation:
University of York
Corinne Rowley
Affiliation:
United Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Janet Stowe
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Ann Chamberlain
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstarct

An evaluation was conducted of the approaches, costs, and quality-of-life outcomes associated with communication aid assessment programs for the speech-impaired provided by specialist Communication Aids Centres (CACs) in the United Kingdom. The average costs of CAC assessment programs was £410 per client, which is not excessive. There was evidence of moderate quality-of-life benefits from clients' use of the recommended aids.

Type
Special Section: Technology and Disability
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Spring 1995 , pp. 196 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bryan, S., Parkin, D., & Donaldson, C.Chiropody and the QALY: A case study in assigning categories of disability and distress to patients. Health Policy, 1991,18,169–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Chamberlain, M. A., Rowley, C., Stowe, J. et al. An evaluation of Communication Aids Centres. Report commissioned by the Department of Health. Universities of York/Leeds: Centre for Health Economics/Rheumatology Rehabilitation Research Unit, 1991.Google Scholar
3.Davis, A. The prevalence of deafness. In Ballantyne, J., Martin, M. C., & Martin, A. (eds.), Deafness, 5th ed.London: Whurr Publishers, 1993, 1–12.Google Scholar
4.Drummond, M. F. (ed.), Measuring the quality of life of people with visual impairment: Proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1990.Google Scholar
5.Drummond, M. F., Mohide, E. A., Tew, M., et al. Economic evaluation of a support program for caregivers of demented elderly. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991, 7, 2, 209-19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Enderby, P., & Philipp, R.Speech and language handicap: Towards knowing the size of the problem. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 1986, 21, 2, 151–65.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Gillman, A. E., Simmel, A., & Simon, E. P.Visual handicap in the aged: Self-reported visual disability and the quality of life of residents of public housing for the elderly. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1986, 80, 2, 588–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Jolleff, N., McConachie, H., Winyard, S., et al. Communication aids for children: Procedures and problems. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1992, 34, 719–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Kind, P., Rosser, R., & Williams, A. Valuation of quality of life: Some psychometric evidence. In Jones-lee, M. W. (ed.), The value of life and safety. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland, 1982.Google Scholar
10.Leese, B., Tolley, K., Wright, K., et al. Communication aid centres: Do they fulfill a need? In Corden, A., Robertson, E., & Tolley, K. (eds.), Meeting needs in an affluent society: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Aldershot: Avebury, 1992, 164–77.Google Scholar
11.Lowson, K. V., Drummond, M. F., & Bishop, J. M. Costing new services: Long term domiciliary oxygen therapy. Lancet, 1981, 1146–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Martin, J., Meltzer, H., & Elliot, D.The prevalence of disability among adults: OPCS surveys of disability in Great Britain. London: HMSO, 1988.Google Scholar
13.Pitts, J., & Reeves, A. K.Geographical spread of communication aids facilities for children and young adults up to the age of 19 years. London: Department of Health and Department of Education and Science, 1992.Google Scholar
14.Quinteros, B., Williams, D. R. R., White, C. A. M., & Pickering, M.The costs of using trained and supervised volunteers as part of a speech therapy service for dysphasic patients. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 1984, 19, 205–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Rowley, C., Stowe, J., Bryant, J., & Chamberlain, M. A.Communication aids provision. University of Leeds: Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, 1986.Google Scholar
16.Rowley, C., Stowe, J., Bryant, J., & Chamberlain, M. A.Communication aids provision, 1983–86. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 1988, 23, 295–310.Google Scholar
17.Rittenhouse, R. K., White, K., Lowitzer, C., & Shisler, L.The costs and benefits of providing early intervention to very young severely hearing impaired children in the United States: The conceptual outline of a longitudinal research study and some preliminary findings. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 1990, 25, 2, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Stowe, J. A., Tolley, K., Wright, K., Leese, B., & Hennessey, S. Evaluation of communication aids centres. Communication Matters, 1991, Spring, 17–18.Google Scholar
19.Warland, A., & Tanning, F.Assistive devices for hard of hearing persons: Distribution systems and costs. British Journal of Audiology, 1991, 25, 134–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Williams, A.Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. British Medical Journal, 1985, 291, 326–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed