Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:57:06.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Resource Use be Extracted from Randomized Controlled Trials to Calculate Costs?: A Review of Smoking Cessation Interventions in General Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Kathryn Rigby ,
Christopher Silagy  and
Alan Crockett
Kathryn Rigby
Affiliation:
Flinders University of South Australia
Christopher Silagy
Affiliation:
Flinders University of South Australia
Alan Crockett
Affiliation:
Flinders Medical Centre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability to extract information on resource use from randomized controlled trials can provide the groundwork for systematically compiling health economic reviews of health interventions. A review of the brief smoking interventions in general practice demonstrates that not all the necessary information can be extrapolated from these trials, and cost data will have to be supplemented from other sources.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , Fall 1996 , pp. 714 - 720
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Ashenden, R., Silagy, C., & Weller, D. A systematic review of promoting lifestyle change in general practice. Flinders University of South Australia (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
2.Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Establishing and maintaining an international register of randomised controlled trials, Appendix 5, section 5. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration, 1995, 51–52.Google Scholar
3.Riby, K. D., Silagy, C., & Crockett, A.Health economic reviews: Are they compiled systematically? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996, 12, 450–59.Google Scholar
4.Silagy, C., Mant, D., Fowler, G., & Lodge, M.Meta-analysis on efficacy of nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation. Lancet, 1994, i, 139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar