Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:23:54.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyzing Errors in Practice: A Vehicle for Assessing and Enhancing the Quality of Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Susan S. Deusinger
Susan S. Deusinger
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Failures are inevitable in health care. When failure occurs as a result of practitioner error, quality in patient care may be compromised. This article proposes that analyzing clinical errors may contribute to quality assurance. Examples from physical therapy illustrate how information gained from analyzing errors can enhance patient care.

Type
Special Section: Assessing The Technology Of Physical Therapy
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 62 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Abraham, I. L.Diagnostic discrepancy and clinical inference — A social-cognitive analysis. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 1985, 112, 41–102.Google Scholar
2.Arkes, H. R.Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981, 49, 323–30.Google Scholar
3.Blum, A. F., & Rosenberg, L.Some problems involved in professionalizing social interaction — The case of psychotherapeutic training. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1968, 9, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Bosk, C. L.Forgive and remember— Managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
5.Bourne, S.Under the doctor—Studies in the psychological problems of physiotherapists, patients and doctors. England: Avebury Publishing Co., 1981.Google Scholar
6.Coe, R. M., & Brehm, H. P.Preventive health services and physician error. Social Services and Medicine, 1973, 7, 303–05.Google Scholar
7.Cooper, J. B., Newbower, R. S., Long, C. D., et al. Preventable anesthesia mishaps —A study of human factors. Anesthesiology, 1978, 49, 399–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Daniels, M. J.Affect and its control in the medical intern. American Journal of Sociology, 1972, 66, 259–67.Google Scholar
9.Deusinger, S. S.Errors in clinical practice—A critical incident survey of physical therapists in Missouri. Unpuol. Doctoral dissertation. St. Louis, MO: Washington University, 1987.Google Scholar
10.Dillman, D. A.Mail and telephone surveys—The total design method. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
11.Donabedian, A.Evaluation of the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1966, 93, 106–203.Google Scholar
12.Duncan, R., & Weston-Smith, M. (eds.). Lying truths—A critical scrutiny of current beliefs and conventions. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
13.Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M.Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 99, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., Sprafka, S. A., et al. Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
15.Fessel, W. J., & Van Brunt, E. E.Assessing quality care from the medical record. New England Journal of Medicine, 1972, 286, 134–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Flannagan, J.The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1954, 51, 327–58.Google Scholar
17.Fox, R. Training for uncertainty. In Merton, R. K., Reader, C. G., & Kendall, P. L. (eds.), The student physician. Introductory studies in the sociology of medical education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
18.Gorman, M. E.How the possibility of error affects falsification on a task that models scientific problem solving. British Journal of Psychology, 1986, 77, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Grant, G., Elbow, P., Ewens, T., et al. On competence—A critical analysis of competence based reforms in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishing Co., 1979.Google Scholar
20.Heintz, W. D.Treatment planning and design — Prevention of errors of omission and commission. Dental Clinics of North America, 1979, 23, 3–12.Google Scholar
21.Hershey, R.Executive miscalculation. University of Michigan Business Review, 1979, 31,1–7.Google Scholar
22.Hughes, E. C.Mistakes at work. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1951, 17, 320–27.Google Scholar
23.Hughes, E. C.Men and their work. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1958.Google Scholar
24.Knoke, D., & Burke, P. J.Log linear models. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.LaDuca, A.The structure of competence in the health professions. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1980, 3, 253–288.Google Scholar
26.Light, D. W.Psychiatry and suicide —The management of a mistake. American Journal of Sociology, 1972, 77, 821–38.Google Scholar
27.Light, D. W.Becoming psychiatrists—The professional transformation of self. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1980.Google Scholar
28.McGaghie, W. C.The evaluation of competence — Validity issues in the health professions. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1980, 3, 289–320.Google Scholar
29.Mizrahi, T.Managing medical mistakes — Ideology, insularity and accountability among internists-in-training. Social Science and Medicine, 1984, 19, 135–46.Google Scholar
30.Neufeld, V. R. Historical perspectives on clinical competence. In Neufeld, V. R. & Norman, G. R. (eds.), Assessing clinic competence. New York: Springer Publishing Co., 1985.Google Scholar
31.Nisbett, R., & Ross, L.Human inference—Strategies and shortcomings and social judgements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
32.Payne, B. C.The medical record as a basis for assessing clinical competence. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1979, 91, 623–29.Google Scholar
33.Perrow, C.A framework for comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32, 194–208.Google Scholar
34.Rousseau, D. M.Technological differences in job characteristics, employee satisfaction and motivation — A synthesis of job design research and sociotechnical systems theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977, 19, 18–42.Google Scholar
35.Rousseau, D. M.Characteristics of departments, positions and individuals — Contexts for attitudes and behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 521–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Ryan, W.Blaming the victim. New York: Pantheon Books, 1971.Google Scholar
37.Scheff, T. J.Decision rules and types of error, and their consequences in medical diagnosis. Behavioral Science, 1973, 8, 97–107.Google Scholar
38.Slater, C. H.An analysis of ambulatory care quality assessment research. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1989, 12, 347–78.Google Scholar
39.Smith, I. L.The use of written simulations in credentialling programs. Professional Practice of Psychology, 1983, 4, 21–50.Google Scholar
40.Stelling, J., & Bucher, R.Vocabularies of realism in professional socialization. Social Science and Medicine, 1975, 7, 661–75.Google Scholar
41.Sudman, S., & Bradborn, N. M.Asking questions — A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishing Co., 1983.Google Scholar
42.Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 1974, 185, 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Voytovich, A. E., Rippey, R. M., & Suffredini, A.Premature conclusions in diagnostic reasoning. Journal of Medical Education, 1985, 60, 302–07.Google ScholarPubMed