Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:17:11.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adapting Work Sites for Disabled Persons Using Advanced Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Thomas Malmsborg
Thomas Malmsborg
Affiliation:
TeleNova, Stockholm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstarct

This paper describes the technical approach in the TUFFA (Technology Procurement for Disabled in Working Life) project and a model for cooperating areas of competence based on a holistic view of the individual's abilities, the environmental conditions at the work site, and technical solutions.

Type
Special Section: Technology and Disability
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Spring 1995 , pp. 235 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.A presentation of prototype workstations. Stockholm: Swedish National Labour Market Board, 1990.Google Scholar
2.Ami-S, Employability institutes with special resources for disabled people. Stockholm: Swedish National Labour Market Board, 1987.Google Scholar
3.Axelsson, R., & Löfgren, K-G.Arbetsmarknadsutbildningensprivat - och samhällsekonomiska effekter (Economic private and community effects of employment training). Umea: Universitet, 1992.Google Scholar
4.Berkowitz, M., & Hunt, H.A. Conclusions and recommendations. In Hunt, H. A., & Berkowitz, M. (eds.), New technologies and the employment of disabled persons. Geneva: International Labour Office, 1992, 151–62.Google Scholar
5.Breding, J.TUFFA-projektet, en avrapportering for Men 1985 tom 1990 (The TUFFA project, a report for the period 1985 to 1990) [in Swedish]. Stockholm: AMS, 1991.Google Scholar
6.Börjesson, K., Galvér, H., Hellgren, R., & Rundström, I. New possibilities for disabled people in the work situation. Employability institutes and technology in cooperation. Technical development within a service delivery system. A Swedish experience. Presented at the European Conference on the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology, ECART 2. Stockholm, 05 26–28, 1993.Google Scholar
7.Breding, J., & Keijer, U. Computer-based technology for disabled persons in work life: A holistic approach. In Hunt, H. A., & Berkowitz, M. (eds.), New technologies and the employment of disabled persons. Geneva: International Labour Office, 1992, 79–93.Google Scholar
8.Dahlberg, R., & Malmsborg, T.Inmatningshastighet (Input speed) [in Swedish]. Stockholm: AMS, 1991.Google Scholar
9.Gauffin, B. G.Ny mediateknik: Hot och löfte (New media technology: Threat and promise) [in Swedish]. Bromma: Handikappinstitutet, 1983.Google Scholar
10.Gill, J. M. Information for people planning technical research for visually disabled persons. In Ballabio, E., Placencia-porrero, I. & Puig De La Bellacasa, R. (eds.), Rehabilitation technology: Strategies for the European union. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1993, 225–29.Google Scholar
11.Harness, S., Pugh, K., Sherkat, N., & Withrow, R. Fast icon and character recognition for universal access to WIMP interfaces for blind and partially sighted. In Ballabio, E., Placencia-porrero, I., & Puig De La Bellacasa, R. (eds.), Rehabilitation technology: Strategies for the European union. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1993, 19–23.Google Scholar
12.Kielhofner, G.Functional assessment: Toward a dialectical view of person-environment relations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1993, 47, 248–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Larsson, S.Handikappade, arbete och ny teknik (Disabled persons, work and new technology) [in Swedish]. Malmö: Hadar, 1991.Google Scholar
14.Leahy, J. & Leneway, R. Factors associated with the traditional rehabilitation centre’s ability to train disabled persons for advanced technology occupations. In Hunt, H. A., & Berkowitz, M. (eds.), New technologies and the employment of disabled persons. Geneva: International Labour Office, 1992, 57–76.Google Scholar
15.Lorentzon, P.Välja nya vägar (Chosing new approaches) [in Swedish]. Bromma: Handikappinstitutet, 1990.Google Scholar
16.Lundman, M. Methodology in R&D in rehabilitation technology. At 1st TIDE Congress. Brussels, 04 6–7, 1993.Google Scholar
17.Malmsborg, T., Breding, J., & Keijer, U. Computer technology for impaired or disabled persons in an occupational environment: Experiences from a five year project in Sweden. In Ballabio, E., Placencia-porrero, I., & Puig De La Bellacasa, R. (eds.), Rehabilitation technology: Strategies for the European union. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1993, 199–203.Google Scholar
18.Malmsborg, T., Lindgren, H., Mossberg, K., Rundström, I., & Karlsson, M-L. Delprojekt Afasi i TUFFA-projektet (Interim report: Aphasia in the TUFFA project) [in Swedish]. In Keijer, U. & Râgfeldt, G., Afasi (Aphasia). Stockholm: AMS, 1991.Google Scholar
19.Milner, M. Rehabilitation technology: Exploitation of R&D and current technologies. In Ballabio, E., Placencia-porrero, I., & Puig De La Bellacasa, R. (eds.), Rehabilitation technology: Strategies for the European union. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1993, 3–11.Google Scholar
20.Moses, J. F. Preparing for the brave new workplace. In The impact of new technology on the employment of people with disabilities. Special supplement to International Rehabilitation Review, 1988, 7–10.Google Scholar
21.Petrie, H., Strothotte, T., Weber, G., & Deconick, F. The design and evaluation of rehabilitative computer technology for blind people: The need for a multi-disciplinary approach. In Ballabio, E., Placencia-porrero, I., & Puig De La Bellacasa, R. (eds.), Rehabilitation technology: Strategies for the European union. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1993, 220–24.Google Scholar
22.Richardsson, S., Poulson, D., & Nicolle, C. User requirements capture for adaptable smarter home technologies. In. Ballabio, E., Placencia-porrero, I., & Puig De La Bellacasa, R. (eds.), Rehabilitation technology: Strategies for the European union. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1993, 244–48.Google Scholar
23.Sandhu, J., McKee, I., & Carruthers, S. The role of evaluation in the development of rehabilitation technology products. In Ballabio, E., Placencia-porrero, I., & Puig De La Bellacasa, R. (eds.), Rehabilitation technology: Strategies for the European union. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1993, 174–78.Google Scholar
24. TIDE 1993–1994 workplan, Brussels, 1992, updated 1993.Google Scholar
25.TUFFA performance specification. Stockholm: Swedish National Labour Market Board, 1990.Google Scholar
26.Velozo, C. A.Work evaluations: Critique of the state of the art of functional assessment of work. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1993, 47, 203–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed