Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:18:07.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

USABILITY OF ONLINE PSYCHOEDUCATION FOR SIBLINGS OF PEOPLE WITH PSYCHOSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2014

Jacqueline Sin ,
Claire Henderson  and
Ian Norman
Jacqueline Sin
Affiliation:
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery & Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College [email protected]
Claire Henderson
Affiliation:
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London
Ian Norman
Affiliation:
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King's College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The E Sibling Project aims to address the needs of siblings of individuals affected by psychosis through provision of a comprehensive online intervention. The online intervention comprises four core elements, including: information on psychosis; various coping and promoting well-being strategies; siblings' blogs and discussion forum with peers; and an “Ask the Experts” function. After the intervention-prototype was developed, we tested its feasibility, usability and acceptability by siblings.

Methods: We evaluated the usability of the intervention-prototype using a non-randomised usability study with siblings of individuals diagnosed with psychosis. The usability study adapted Poulson et al's framework to collect subjective feedback from participants on ease of use, perceived usefulness and acceptability, together with objective usage data on the intervention.

Results: Twenty siblings were recruited to the usability test; 19 tried out the resource-prototype over a 4-week period and 17 completed the online evaluation after using the intervention. In total, 906 page-views were made by the participants and each spent about two hours using the resource. Participants evaluated the intervention as helpful, relevant and useful in terms of content, design and usability. Developments are needed to improve the navigation and intuitiveness of the resource.

Conclusions: Using an internet-based information-giving and peer support intervention to promote wellbeing and coping is feasible and acceptable to siblings of people with psychosis.

Keywords

e-health/ e-mental healthonline/ internet/ web-based psychoeducationusabilitysiblings/ brothers/ sisterspsychosis/ schizophrenia
Type
Assessments
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 374 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Milevsky, A. Sibling relationships in childhood & adolescence: Predictors & outcomes. New York: Columbia University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
2. Buist, KL, Dekovic, M, Prinzie, P. Sibling relationship quality and psychopathology of children and adolescents: A meta analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:97–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Sin, J, Moone, N, Harris, P, Scully, E, Wellman, N. Understanding the experiences and service needs of siblings of individuals with first episode psychosis: A phenomenological study. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2012;6:53–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Smith, MJ, Greenberg, JS, Mailick Seltzer, M. Siblings of adults with schizophrenia: Expectations about future caregiving roles. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2007;77:29–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Rethink Mental Illness. Siblings network for brothers and sisters - updated 2013. http://www.rethink.org/carers-family-friends/brothers-and-sisters-siblings-network (accessed April 20, 2014).Google Scholar
6. Sin, J. Focus group study of siblings of individuals with psychosis: Views on designing an online psychoeducational resource. J Psychosoc Nurs. 2013;51:28–36.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Sin, J, Jordan, C, Barley, E, Henderson, C, Norman, I. Psychoeducation for siblings of individuals with severe mental illness (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD010540. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010540.Google Scholar
8. Powell, J, Martin, S, Sutcliffe, P, et al. Young people and mental health - The role of information and communication technology (Warwick Medical School Research Project funded by Comic Relief). Warwick: Warwick Medical School; 2010.Google Scholar
9. Murray, E, Khadjesari, Z, White, IR, et al. Methological challenges in online trials. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Sin, J, Norman, I. Psychoeducational interventions for families of individuals with schizophrenia: A mixed method systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74:e1145–e1162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Staley, K. A series of case studies illustrating the impact of service user and carer involvement on research. London: National Institute for Health Research; 2013.Google Scholar
12. Rotondi, AJ. Schizophrenia. In: Cucciare, MA, Weingardt, KR, eds. Using technology to support evidence-based behavioural health practices - A clinician's guide. New York: Routledge; 2010:69–90.Google Scholar
13. Poulson, D, Ashby, M, Richardson, S. A practical handbook on user-centred deisgn for assistive technology. Brussels: TIDE European Commission; 1996.Google Scholar
14. Sin, J, Henderson, C, Pinfold, V, Norman, I. The E Sibling Project - Development and exploratory randomised controlled trial of an online multi-component psychoeducational intervention for siblings of individuals with first episode psychosis. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. 2008. London: MRC; 2008.Google Scholar
16. Pinfold, V, Duggan, A, Huxley, P, et al. The development of an online training resource for mental health professionals to involve carers in information sharing - Report for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation Programme. London: Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO; 2010.Google Scholar
17. Koo, M, Skinner, H. Challenges of internet recruitment: A case study with disappointing results. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Thompson, D, Canada, A, Bhatt, R, et al. eHealth recruitment challenges. Eval Program Plann. 2006;29:433–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Powell, J, Hamborg, T, Stallard, N, et al. Effectiveness of a web-based cognitive-behavioural tool to improve mental well-being in the general population: Randomised controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Couper, MP, Peytchev, A, Strecher, VJ, et al. Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: Randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9:e16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Mitchell, J, Stanimirovic, R, Klein, B, Vella-Brodrick, D. A randomized controlled trial of a self-guided internet intervention promoting well-being. Comput Human Behav. 2009;25:749–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Eysenbach, G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Khadjesari, Z, Murray, E, Kalaitzaki, E, et al. Impact and costs of incentives to reduce attrition in online trials: Two randomised controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Powell, J, Jennings, A, Armstrong, N, et al. Pilot study of a virtual diabetes clinic: Satisfaction and usability. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15:150–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Xia, J, Merinder, LB, Belgamwar, WR. Psychoeducation for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;6:CD002831. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002831.pub2.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sin Supplementary Material

Figure 1

Download Sin Supplementary Material(File)
File 94.5 KB