Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:57:40.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HEALTHY-YEAR EQUIVALENTS IN MAJOR JOINT REPLACEMENT

Can Patients Provide Meaningful Responses?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2002

Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas
Affiliation:
Dartmouth Medical School
Rena Arshinoff
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre
Mary Bell
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre
Jack Ivan Williams
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre
C. David Naylor
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre

Abstract

Objectives: Healthy-years equivalents (HYEs) have been proposed as an evaluative measure with advantages over quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The main purpose was to assess the feasibility of eliciting HYEs from patients who have undergone major joint replacement; a secondary objective was to examine relationships with postsurgical health status.

Methods: Pre- and postsurgical reports of perceived comorbidity and current arthritic burden were obtained from 194 patients, using a comorbidity checklist, summary scores from the Western Ontario/McMaster Osteoarthritis Questionnaire (WOMAC), summary scores derived from six Likert scales, and holistic utility scores for the same attributes. After surgery, HYEs for the full across-time health profile were also elicited.

Results: All measures of arthritic burden were sensitive to pre/postsurgical changes (p = .0001), and comorbidity scores were stable. Two HYE subgroups emerged. An HYE-invariant subgroup ascribed full HYEs to their profiles, while reporting higher Likert (t = 2.1309; p = .0344) and utility (s = 4.1504; p = .0001) scores for their postsurgical health state. An HYE-variant subgroup reported HYEs that were weakly but significantly (p < .009) correlated with Likert (r = .30), utility (rs = .25), and comorbidity (r = −.26) scores for their postsurgical state.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that patients can understand the HYE assessment procedures and provide interpretable responses. However, a significant proportion reports invariant HYEs that could inflate estimates of the overall mean HYE. Further exploration of the HYEs reported by different clinical and attitudinal populations is needed before widespread adoption of this measure.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)