Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:21:39.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence-based searching for health technology assessment: keeping up to date with SuRe Info

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2021

Jaana Isojärvi Open the ORCID record for Jaana Isojärvi [Opens in a new window]  and
Julie Glanville Open the ORCID record for Julie Glanville [Opens in a new window]
Jaana Isojärvi
Affiliation:
Independent Information Specialist, MSSc, Kangasala, Finland
Julie Glanville*
Affiliation:
Independent Consultant, BA, PGDipLib, Msc, York, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Julie Glanville, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Evidence syntheses of all types have their foundation in literature searches. Literature searching is developing in line with the growing use of evidence synthesis and is also informed, as a field of work, by the spirit of being evidence-based. Increasing numbers of research papers about information retrieval are being published, and keeping up to date with the latest developments in this ever more wide-ranging field is demanding.

Methods

Summarized Research in Information Retrieval for HTA (SuRe Info) is a Web site (http://www.sure-info.org) that summarizes research-based information on effective and efficient evidence identification for the different aspects of health technology assessment (HTA) and evidence synthesis. This paper describes the rationale, processes, and challenges of producing SuRe Info and insights into the pace of development in the field of evidence-based information retrieval. The paper also provides scenarios suggesting how SuRe Info can help searchers in their daily work and with specific questions.

Results

SuRe Info currently comprises seventeen chapters, falling into two categories: (i) chapters about general search methods relating to all types of research and (ii) chapters summarizing the methods to use when searching for specific aspects of HTA (as defined in the HTA Core Model® by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA)).

Conclusions

SuRe Info is not a substitute for methods handbooks, but by providing an overview of current research evidence for major issues in information retrieval in HTA, it helps searchers in this field to keep abreast of the latest research.

Keywords

Information storage and retrievalTechnology assessment, BiomedicalEvidence-Based Practice
Type
Article Commentary
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , 2021 , e51
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

HTAi Information Retrieval Interest Group. Summarized research in information retrieval for HTA. Available from: http://www.sure-info.orgGoogle Scholar
Glanville, J. Searching bibliographic databases. In: Cooper, HM, Hedges, LV, Valentine, JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 3rd ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2019. p. 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, C, Glanville, J, Briscoe, S, Littlewood, A, Marshall, C, Metzendorf, M-I, et al. Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies. In: Higgins, JPT, Thomas, J, Chandler, J, Cumpston, M, Li, T, Page, MJ, et al. editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane; 2020. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbookGoogle Scholar
EUnetHTA JA3WP6B2-2 Authoring Team. Process of information retrieval for systematic reviews and health technology assessments on clinical effectiveness. Methodological guidelines. Diemen, The Netherlands: EUnetHTA; 2019. Available from: https://eunethta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/EUnetHTA_Guideline_Information_Retrieval_v2-0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Janssens, ACJW, Gwinn, M, Brockman, JE, Powell, K, Goodman, M. Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: A validation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20:25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belter, CW. Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67:2766–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, S, Spackman, E. Bidirectional citation searching to completion: An exploration of literature searching methods. PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33:5–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, JPT, Thomas, J, Chandler, J, Cumpston, M, Li, T, Page, MJ, et al. , editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane; 2020. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbookGoogle Scholar
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York; 2009.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine. Finding what works in health care: Standards for systematic reviews. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2011.Google Scholar
EUnetHTA Joint Action 2 Work Package 8. HTA Core Model ® version 3.0 (Pdf) 2016. Available from: http://www.htacoremodel.info/BrowseModel.aspxGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, C, Glanville, J, Briscoe, S, Littlewood, A, Marshall, C, Metzendorf, M-I, et al. Technical supplement to chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies. In: Higgins, JPT, Thomas, J, Chandler, J, Cumpston, MS, Li, T, Page, MJ, et al. editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane; 2020. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbookGoogle Scholar