Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:41:58.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE EFFECT OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT USE IN POSTLINGUALLY DEAF ADULTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2001

Paul F. M. Krabbe
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre Nijmegen
Johannes B. Hinderink
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre Nijmegen
Paul van den Broek
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre Nijmegen

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) on the health status of postlingually deaf adults.

Methods: Participants comprised 45 postlingually deaf adult multichannel CI users and 46 deaf candidates on the waiting list for a CI. The latter group acted as control subjects to corroborate the validity of retrospective completion of the questionnaires by the CI recipients. Three HRQOL instruments were used: a) a specially developed CI questionnaire (NCIQ); b) a generic HRQOL questionnaire (SF-36); and c) a health-state classification system (HUI-2) suited to estimate single preference scores.

Results: Retrospectively estimated pre-implant scores in the CI user group corresponded very well with the scores in the control group. Postimplant scores in the CI users were substantially higher in all six domains (p < .001) of the NCIQ than the scores in the control group. Effects due to a CI were also observed with the SF-36 in five of the seven domains (p < .01). Statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = .001) were observed in two of the six domains of the HUI-2.

Conclusions: All three questionnaires detected improvements in HRQOL due to CI use. To make a detailed assessment of the effect of a CI on functional outcomes and well-being, a special purpose HRQOL instrument is far more adequate than a general HRQOL instrument. This study also showed that a CI affects several other health domains besides auditory performance. The effect of CI use on general functioning and well-being proved to be considerable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)