Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:27:15.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of a Health Technology Assessment Program: The Case of Alberta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Devidas Menon ,
Frank Fung ,
Christa Harstall  and
Petra O'Connell
Devidas Menon
Affiliation:
Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment
Frank Fung
Affiliation:
Health Technology Assessment Unit, Alberta Health
Christa Harstall
Affiliation:
Health Technology Assessment Unit, Alberta Health
Petra O'Connell
Affiliation:
Health Technology Assessment Unit, Alberta Health
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Canada comprises 10 provinces and 2 territories. The Constitution assigns responsibility for the provision of health services in the provinces to provincial governments. Over the past 5 years, provincial governments have identified technology assessment as a priority. This paper describes an initiative taken by the government of the province of Alberta to develop a health technology assessment program for that province.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Winter 1995 , pp. 93 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Clark, E., and Marshall, D. A description of the organization and function of national health technology assessment agencies. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting, International Society for Technology Assessment in Health Care, Sorrento, Italy, 1993, 146.Google Scholar
2.Donaldson, M. S., and Cox, H. C. Jr.Setting priorities for health technology assessment: A model process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.Google Scholar
3.Fuchs, V. R. and Garber, A. M.The new technology assessment. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 673–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Government of Alberta. An agenda for action: Report of the advisory committee on the utilization of medical services. Edmonton, Canada: Government of Alberta, 1989.Google Scholar
5.Government of Alberta. Partners in health (The Government of Alberta's response to the premier's commission on future health care for Albertans). Edmonton, Canada: Government of Alberta.Google Scholar
6.Herdman, R. C. and Behney, C. J.Health and life sciences at the Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1985, 1, 160–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Lomas, J.Retailing research: Increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for child birth. Milbank Quarterly, 1993, 71, 439–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Menon, D.Health technology assessment in Canada. Dimensions in Health Service, 1990, 67, 31.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Menon, D. Technology assessment. In Ziebarth, S. A. (ed.), Feeling the squeeze. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Hospital Association, 1991, 361–67.Google Scholar
10.Premier's Commission on Future Health Care for Albertans. The rainbow report: Our vision for health. Edmonton, Canada: Government of Alberta, 1989.Google Scholar