Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T06:25:28.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Consensus Development Program: Detecting Changes in Medical Practice Following A Consensus Conference on the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Charles R. Sherman ,
Arnold L. Potosky ,
Kathleen A. Weis  and
John H. Ferguson
Charles R. Sherman
Affiliation:
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Arnold L. Potosky
Affiliation:
U.S. National Cancer Institute
Kathleen A. Weis
Affiliation:
U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
John H. Ferguson
Affiliation:
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The treatment of prostate cancer was reviewed at a U.S. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference in June 1987. Data from the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor registries were analyzed and showed that the proportion of eligible prostate cancer patients receiving the recommended therapies did not increase at a faster rate after the conference than before.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Fall 1992 , pp. 683 - 693
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 1991. CA—A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1991, 41, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Austin, D. F., Reynolds, P., Boyd, P., et al. Progress in the war against cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 1989, 321, 1197–98.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Bagshaw, M. A.Potential for radiotherapy alone in prostatic cancer. Cancer, 1985, 55(suppl 9), 2079–85.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Catalona, W. J., & Bigg, S. W.Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Evaluation of results after 250 patients. The Journal of Urology, 1990, 143(3), 538–44.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Devesa, S. S., Silverman, D. T., Young, J. L. Jr., et al. Cancer incidence and mortality trends among whites in the United States, 1947–84. Journal of The National Cancer Institute, 1987, 79(4), 701–70.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Fisher, E. S., Malenka, D. J., Wennberg, J. E., & Roos, N. P.Technology assessment using insurance claims. Example of prostatectomy. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1990, 6(2), 194–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Frey, C. M., McMillen, M. M., Cowen, C. D., et al. Representativeness at the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program data: Recent trends in cancer mortality rates. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1992, 84, 872–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Gibbons, R. P., Korrea, R. J., Brannen, G. E., et al. Total prostatectomy for localized prostatic cancer. The Journal of Urology, 1984, 131, 73–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Greenberg, E. R., Chute, C. G., Stukel, T., et al. Social and economic factors in the choice of lung cancer treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988, 318, 612–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hanks, G. E., Liebel, S. A., Krall, J. M., et al. Patterns of care studies: Dose-response observations for local control of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 1985, 11, 153–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Hill, M. N., Levine, D. M., & Whelton, P. K.Awareness, use, and impact of the 1984 Joint National Committee consensus report on high blood pressure. American Journal of Public Health, 1988, 78, 1190–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Horm, J. W., Asire, A. J., Young, J. L. Jr., et al. , (eds.). Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: Cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1973–81. Bethesda, MD: DHHS Pub. No. (NIH)85–1837, 1984.Google Scholar
13.Iezzoni, L. I.Using administrative diagnostic data to assess the quality of hospital care: Pitfalls and potential of ICD-9-CM. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1990, 6(2), 272–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Institute of Medicine. Consensus Development at the NIH: Improving the Program. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1990.Google Scholar
15.Jewett, H. J.The case for radical perineal prostatectomy. The Journal of Urology, 1970, 103, 195–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Kanouse, D. E., Brook, R. H., Winkler, J. D., et al. Changing medical practice through technology assessment: An evaluation of the NIH Consensus Development Program. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation, 1989.Google Scholar
17.Klawansky, S., Burdick, E., Adams, M., et al. The use of the SEER cancer registry for technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991, 7(2), 134–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Kolada, G.Prostate cancer consensus hampered by lack of data. Science, 1987, 238, 1626–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kosecoff, J., Kanouse, D. E., & Brook, R. H.Changing practice patterns in the management of primary breast cancer: Consensus Development Program. Health Services Research, 1990, 25, 809–23.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Kosecoff, J., Kanouse, D. E., Rogers, W. H., et al. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 258, 2708–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Lave, J., Dobson, A., & Walton, C.The potential use of Health Care Financing data sets for health services research. Health Care Financing Review, 1983, 5, 93–98.Google Scholar
22.Mebane, C., Gibbs, T., & Horm, J. W.Current status of prostate cancer in North American black males. Journal of the National Medical Association, 1990, 82, 782–88.Google ScholarPubMed
23.Moses, L. E.Framework for considering the role of data bases in technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1990, 6(2), 183–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.National Cancer Institute. NCI monograph: Consensus development conference on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Pub. No. 88–3005, 1988.Google Scholar
25.National Institutes of Health. NIH Consensus Conference. The management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 258(19), 2727– 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Neglia, W. J., Hussey, D. H., & Johnson, D. E.Megavoltage radiation therapy for carcinoma of the prostate. International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics, 1977, 2, 873–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Neter, J., & Wasserman, W.Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1974, 313–18.Google Scholar
28.Perez, C. A., Fair, W. R., & Ihde, D. C. Carcinoma of the prostate. In Devita, V. T. Jr., Hellman, S., & Rosenberg, S. A. (eds.), Cancer: Principles and practice of oncology. Philadephia, PA: Lippincott, 1989, 1044–88.Google Scholar
29.Ries, L. A. G., Hankey, B. F., & Edwards, B. K. (eds.). Cancer statistics review 1973–87. Bethesda, MD: NIH, Pub. No. 90–2789, 1989.Google Scholar
30.Schmidt, J. D., Mettlin, C. J., Natarajan, N., et al. Trends in patterns of care for prostatic cancer, 1974–1983: Results of surveys by the American College of Surgeons. The Journal of Urology, 1986, 136(2), 416–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Steinberg, E. P., Whittle, J., & Anderson, G. F.Impact of claims data research on clinical practice. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1990,6(2), 282–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Taylor, W. J., Richardson, R. G., & Hafermann, M. D.Radiation therapy for localized prostatic cancer. Cancer, 1979, 43, 1123–27.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Walsh, P. C., & Jewett, H. J.Radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Cancer, 1980, 45,1906–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Walsh, P. C., Lepor, H., & Eggleston, J. C.Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function. Prostate, 1983, 4, 473–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Winkler, J. D., Kanouse, D. E., Brodsley, L., & Brook, R. H.Popular press coverage of eight National Institutes of Health consensus development topics. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1986, 255, 1323–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed