Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:34:21.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studying Political Islam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2011

Jillian Schwedler*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.; e-mail: [email protected]

Extract

Over the past two decades, scholars of the Middle East have produced an impressive body of scholarship that seeks to understand diverse groups and practices that are together called political Islam. Much of our work has drawn little attention outside of academia despite the obsession with Islam shared by policymakers and the general public. The many careful studies produced by academics and some journalists—typically based on extensive field research and use of primary sources in Arabic, Turkish, and Persian—have to contend with bestselling books that trade in fears about the irrational, West-hating Muslim fanatic. Unfortunately, serious scholarship on political Islam cannot ignore this terrain of stereotypes and fearmongering, as it dominates mainstream debates about Islam and the Middle East. But in responding to these discourses, we often allow them to dictate our analytic starting point, resulting in less theoretical innovation and empirical insight than might emerge if we moved beyond the focus on Islamist groups and whether most are moderate or radical. Indeed, we might do well to abandon altogether the idea that “political Islam” represents a tangible object of study.

Type
Roundtable
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 See Lisa Wedeen, “Scientific Knowledge, Liberalism, and Empire: American Political Science in the Modern Middle East,” Social Science Research Council, June 2007, http://www.ssrc.org/publications/view/8A197ABF-ED60-DE11-BD80-001CC477EC70/ (accessed 29 September 2010).

2 Mahmoud Mamdani shows how this more recent discourse of “good” and “bad” Muslims is not that different from the Orientalist discourses critiqued by Mamdani, Edward Said., Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror (New York: Pantheon, 2004)Google Scholar.

3 Schwedler, Jillian, Faith in Moderation: Islamist Parties in Jordan and Yemen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 See, for example, Ismail, Salwa, Political Life in Cairo's New Quarters: Encountering the Everyday State (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Deeb, Lara, An Enchanted Modern: Gender and Public Piety in Shiʿi Lebanon (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; and Bayat, Asef, Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East (Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.