Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:45:37.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Printing, Publishing, and Reform in Tsarist Central Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Adeeb Khalid
Adeeb Khalid
Affiliation:
Department of History, Carleton College, Northfield, Minn. 55057, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Scholars have long noted, often with disapproval, the tardiness of the introduction of printing to the Muslim world, but the consequences of that introduction on the production, reproduction, and transmission of knowledge in Muslim societies are only now beginning to be understood. For instance, the numerous movements for modernist reform that arose in the Muslim world in the 19th century were all propagated through the medium of print, yet the connection between those movements and the availability of printing seldom has been investigated. This neglect is all the more surprising in view of the fact that historians of early modern Europe have long emphasized the signal role played by printing in Europe's transition to modernity. In her influential work, Elizabeth Eisenstein has written of a “printing revolution” unleashed by the invention and rapid dissemination of the technology in 15th-century Europe. There is, for Eisenstein, something inherent in the very nature of printing that revolutionizes the intellectual outlook of individuals and cultures with which it comes in contact. In a different vein, Benedict Anderson has pointed to the importance of “print capitalism” in creating a sense of shared community in the 19th century that made possible the rise of national ism in many parts of the world.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , May 1994 , pp. 187 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

Author's note: The first germs of this article were present in a paper given at the Fourth International Conference on Central Asia in Madison, Wisconsin, in September 1990. Since then, it has benefited greatly from comments by MichaelChamberlain, Cheryl Duncan, Uli Schamiloglu, and M. Nazif Shahrani. Any errors of fact or opinion are, of course, solely mine.

1 Carter, Thomas F., “Islam as a Barrier to Printing,” The Moslem World 33 (1943): 213–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Eickelman, Dale F., “Changing Interpretations of Islamic Movements” in Islam and the Political Economy of Meaning: Comparative Studies of Muslim Discourse, ed. Roff, William R. (Berkeley, Calif., 1987), 25–26Google Scholar.

3 Eisenstein, Elizabeth, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe, 2 vols. (Cambridge, Eng., 1979), 1:3–159Google Scholar; an abridged ver sion of this book was published as The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge, Eng., 1983)Google Scholar.

4 Eisenstein, , Printing Press, 1:55Google Scholar.

5 Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, 2nd ed. (London, 1991), 33–46Google Scholar.

6 Karimullin, Abrar, U istokov tatarskoi knigi (ot nachala vozniknoveniia do 60-kh godov XIX veka) (Kazan, 1971), 38–111Google Scholar; Balagna, Josée, L'Imprimerie arabe en Occident (XVIe, XVIIe et XVIHe siècles) (Paris, 1984), passimGoogle Scholar.

7 The import of Persian-language books from India continued to 1917Google Scholar: Dmitriev, G. L., “Raspros-tranenie indiiskikh izdanii v Srednei Azii v kontse XIX—nachale XX vekov,” Kniga: issledovaniia i materialy 6 (1962): 239–54Google Scholar; on Arabic and Turkish-language books of Ottoman and Egyptian origins, see Bekchurin, Mir-Salikh, Turkestanskaia oblast': zametki (Kazan, 1872), 12Google Scholar.

8 Rustamov, M., Ŭzbek kitobi (Tashkent, 1968), 45Google Scholar.

9 See the bibliography compiled by Burov, N. A., “Dorevoliutsionnaia pechat' Turkestana(1868–1879 gg.),” Nauchnye trudy Tashkentskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 261 (1964), for details on these titlesGoogle Scholar.

10 The exception was a lithographic press set up by Khan, Muhammad Rahim, the ruler of Khiva, at his court in 1874Google Scholar. Because this was the first lithographic press in Central Asia, there has been a tendency in the literature to exaggerate vastly its importance; see Allworth, Edward, Central Asian Publishing and the Rise of Nationalism (New York, 1965), 10–14Google Scholar; Yazberdiyev, Almaz, Arap grafikasïnda neshir edilen Türk-menche kitaplar (Ashkhabad, 1981), 22–27Google Scholar. In reality, as the Russian Orientalist Samoilovich, A. N. described in 1908Google Scholar, the press was used only to print the works of court poets and certain classics in limited editions for distribution among the court elite. The press had no commercial aims, and its impact on Khivan society was minimal. See his “Materialy po sredneaziatsko-turetskoi literature, II: Khivinskie pridvomye knigokhranilishcha i knigopechatnia,” Izvestiia Akademii Nauk Turkmenskoi SSR, ser. nauk, Obsh-chestvennykh, 1 (1981): 82Google Scholar.

11 d'Encausse, Hélène Carrère, Réforme et révolution chez les musulmans de l' Empire russe, 2nd ed. (Paris, 1981), 86–89 and passimGoogle Scholar.

12 Eisenstein, Elizabeth, “From Scriptoria to Printing Shops: Evolution and Revolution in the Early Printed Book Trade,” in Books and Society in History, ed. Carpenter, Kenneth E. (New York, 1983), 33–35Google Scholar.

13 Khalid, Adeeb, “Muslim Printers in Tsarist Central Asia: A Research Note,” Central Asian Survey 11, 3(1992): 113–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Advertisement in Shahidi, Abdurrauf, Mahramlar (Namangan, 1912), 55Google Scholar. On Ishaq Khan, see Usmon, Olim, Ŭzbekistonda rus tilining ilk targhibotchilari (Tashkent, 1962), 40Google Scholar; Bobokhonov, A., Ŭzbek matbaasi tarikhidan (Tashkent, 1979), 112–14Google Scholar.

15 Kholmatov, R. N., Iz istorii uzbekskoi staropechatnoi arabografichnoi knigi i knizhnoi kul'tury v gorodakh Ferganskoi doliny 1867–1917 gg.: avtoreferat (Tashkent, 1989), 13–14Google Scholar.

16 The most detailed list of nāshirs active in the tsarist period is in Mahmudova, Ra”no, “Toshbosma asarlari wa ularning Ŭzbek adabiëti tarikhidagi ahamiyati” (diss., Tashkent, 1970), 51–56Google Scholar, who lists 80 different individuals.

17 Tsentral'nyi gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Uzbekistana, Tashkent (TsGAUz), fond 1, opis' 31, delo 1144, listy 34–36.

18 “ 'Maktab' nashr-i maārif shirkatining qānuni,” Turan (Tashkent), 5 05 1917Google Scholar.

19 Ruud, Charles A., Russian Entrepreneur: Publisher Ivan Sytin of Moscow (Montreal, 1990), 141Google Scholar.

20 For a comprehensive survey of available bibliographies and their shortcomings, see Iazberdyev, A., lz istorii bibliografirovaniia natsional'noi pechati narodov Srednei Azii vtoroi poloviny XIX i pervoi chetverti XX veka (Ashkhabad, 1974)Google Scholar.

21 Chabrov, G. N., “lz istorii poligrafii i izdatel'stva literatury na mestnykh iazykakh v dorevoliut-sionnom Turkestane (1868–1917 gg.),” Trudy Sredneaziatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 57 (1954): 89Google Scholar.

22 Zimin, L., “Bibliografiia,” Sredniaia Aziia 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 (1911); although Zimin's bibliography may not be complete, it is very accurate for what it does coverGoogle Scholar.

23 It should be noted that these figures are significantly higher than those generally quoted in the lit erature. Soviet sources usually cite a figure of thirty-three titles in Uzbek for the year 1913: Istoriia knigi v SSSR 1917–1921, 3 vols. (Moscow, 1986), 3:168Google Scholar. These figures are also used by Allworth, Cen tral Asian Publishing, 36Google Scholar.

24 Hartmann, Martin, “Das Buchwesen in Turkestan und die türkischen Drucke der Sammlung Hart-mann,” Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen 7, 2 (1904): 72Google Scholar.

25 Shahrani, M. Nazif, “Local Knowledge of Islam and Social Discourse in Afghanistan and Turkistan in the Modem Period,” in Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective, ed. Canfield, Robert L. (Cambridge, 1991), 166–70, reproduces a remarkably similar canon from AfghanistanGoogle Scholar.

26 Azärbayjan Kitabï (Bibliografiya), 2 vols, to date (Baku, 1963), 1, passimGoogle Scholar.

27 Zimin, L., “Bibliografiia,” Sredniaia Aziia 2 (1911): 133Google Scholar; Rustamov, , Ŭzbek kitobi, 41, 42Google Scholar.

28 сAynī, Sadr al-Din, Yāddāshthā, ed. Sīrjānī, Saсīdī (Tehran, 1984), 163–65Google Scholar. Sadriddin Ayni (1878–1954) was among the last generation of Central Asians to receive a madrasa education. His copious reminiscences, quoted here from the Persian edition, provide an unsurpassed account of life in Bukhara at the turn of the century.

29 Zhirenshin, A. M., lz istorii kazakhskoi knigi (Alma Ata, 1987), 101–2Google Scholar.

30 Shcheglova, O. P., Katalog litografirovannykh knig na persidskom iazyke v sobranii LO IV AN SSSR, 2 vols. (Moscow, 1975)Google Scholar.

31 Dmitriev, , “Rasprostranenie,” 249–51Google Scholar.

32 Shcheglova, , Katalog, nos. 381, 934, 1213Google Scholar.

33 Dmitriev, , “Rasprostranenie,” 252Google Scholar; Mahmudova, , “Toshbosma,” 55Google Scholar.

34 The dominance of lithography was not unique to Central Asia: it was to prove popular in the Mus lim world wherever nastaсlīq was the dominant script. Typesetting in naskh became common in Iran only in the middle of this century, and Urdu is still usually printed with lithography. Walther, Karl Klaus, “Die lithographische Vervielfätigung von Texten in den Ländern des Vorderen und Mittleren Orients,” Gütenberg Jahrbuch 65 (1990): 223–36Google Scholar.

35 Sharipov, Jumaniyoz, Ŭzbekistonda tarjima tarikhidan (Tashkent, 1964), 397–402Google Scholar, provides a long list of translations (all from Arabic and Persian) that were never printed.

36 Khalid, Adeeb, “The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Tsarist Central Asia” (Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1993), 273–301Google Scholar.

37 Eickelman, Dale F., “Mass Higher Education and the Religious Imagination in Contemporary Arab Societies,” American Ethnologist, 19 (1992): 643–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Shukrullah-oghli, Haji Muin, “Fevral inqilābighacha Samarqand wilayatida chiqghan yangi asar-lar,” Inqilāb, 1 (1922): 42Google Scholar.

39 Evidence of the central importance of purely religious instruction in Jadid schools are the numer ous textbooks devoted to religious dogma and ritual, for example, ʿAynī, Sadriddīn, Żurūriyāt-i dīniyya (Samarqand, 1914)Google Scholar, in Persian, , or Abdurrashidkhan-oghli, Munawwar Qari, Hawāʾij-i dīniya, 3 parts (Tashkent, 1910)Google Scholar, in Uzbek. Jadid writers also provided the first grammars of Uzbek—Muhammad Fakhruddin, Amin b. Muhammad Karim, Turkcha qāʿida (Tashkent, 1913)Google Scholar—and Persian—Muhammad Rasuli, Rasul, Rahbar-i Farsi (Tashkent, 1911)Google Scholar—and the first textbooks on arithmetic—Inayatullah Mirzajan–oghli, Damla, Hisāb masʾalasi (Tashkent, 1913)Google Scholar–and geography-Munawwar Qari, , Yer yuzi (Tashkent, 1913)Google Scholar.

40 TsGAUz, fond 1, opis' 31, delo 943, list 23v.

4I Salihov, M. Buzruk, Ozbek teatr tarixi ucun materiallar (Tashkent, 1935), 55–68Google Scholar.

42 Khoja-oghli, Ishaq Khan Junaydullah, Lughat-i sitta alsina (Tashkent, 1901), 101Google Scholar.

43 Idem, Jāmiс ul-khutut (Namangan, 1912), 84Google Scholar.

44 Atabek-oghli, Fazilbek, trans., Roman: Robinzon hikāyasi (Tashkent, 1912), 48Google Scholar.

45 Anderson, , Imagined Communities, 35Google Scholar.

46 Chartier, Roger, “Du lire au livre,” in Pratiques de la lecture, ed. Chartier, R. (Marseilles, 1985), 69 ffGoogle Scholar.

47 Ostroumov, N. P., “Svedeniia o Turkestanskoi tuzemnoi gazete,” Trudy Syr-Dar'inskogo oblast-nogo statisticheskogo komiteta v 1887–1888 gg. (Tashkent, 1888), 1–3Google Scholar.

48 Khoja, Mahmud [Behbudi], “Gazēt chīst?” Samarqand (Samarqand), 3 May 1913Google Scholar.

49 TsGAUz, fond 461, opis' 1, delo 57, list 607v.

50 TsGAUz, fond 1, opis' 31, delo 536, listy 12–16Google Scholar. Bennigsen, Alexandre and Lemercier-Quelquejay, Chantal, La Presse et le mouvement national chez les Musulmans de Russie avant 1920 (Paris, 1964), 156–70Google Scholar; some of the entries on Central Asia in this seminal work stand in need of correction. See also Saidov, Ziyo, Ŭzbek waqtli matbuoti tarikhiga materiallar (1870–1927) (orig. 1927), in his Tanlangan asarlar (Tashkent, 1974), 13–116Google Scholar.

51 “Muhtaram khwanandalargha” Ayna, 16 November 1914, 40–41Google Scholar.

52 Gosudarstvennyi, arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii, Moscow (GARF [formerly TsGAOR]), fond 102, opis' 245 (1915), delo 74, chast' 84B, list 75Google Scholar.

53 GARF, fond 102, opis' 244 (1914), delo 74, chast' 84B, list 390Google Scholar.

54 Printed dīwāns of no less a person than Alisher Nawaʾi included material that he never wrote; see Mahmudova, Ra”no, “Alisher Nawoiy asarlarining Inqilobgacha bŭlgan nashrlari tarikhidan,” Sharq yulduzi 7 (1968): 230–36Google Scholar.

55 Eickelman, Dale F., Knowledge and Power in Morocco: The Education of a Twentieth-Century No table (Princeton, N.J., 1985), 57–106Google Scholar; Mitchell, Timothy, Colonising Egypt (Cambridge, Eng., 1988), 146–54Google Scholar; Messick, Brinckley, The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim So ciety (Berkeley, Calif., 1993), 25–36, 84–94Google Scholar.

56 Khoja, Mahmud [Behbudi], “Tiyatir nedur?” Ayna, 10 05 1914, 550–53Google Scholar.

57 Criticisms of the ulema were commonplace in Jadid writing; the classic statement of the case was made by Bukhārāyī, Fitrat [Abdurrauf Fitrat], Munāẓara-yi mudarris-i bukhārāyī bā yak nafar-i farangī dar Hindustān dar bāra-yi makātib-i jadīda (Istanbul, 1911), 7–21Google Scholar.

58 Chartier, Roger, The Cultural Uses of Print in Early Modern France, trans. Cochrane, Lydia G. (Princeton, N.J., 1987), 152–58Google Scholar.

59 Reichl, Karl, Turkic Oral Epic Poetry (New York, 1992), 87–89Google Scholar; Sultanov, T. I., “Sredneaziatskaia i vostochnoturkestanskaia pozdnesrednevekovaia rukopis'naia kniga,“ in Rukopis'naia kniga v kul'ture narodov Vostoka: ocherki, 2 vols. (Moscow, 1987), 1:497–98Google Scholar.

60 Hamza Hakimzoda Niyoziy arkhivining katalogi(Tashkent, 1990), 1:306Google Scholar, document no. 494.

61 Zulfiqar, Mulla, “Madrasalargha aid,” Taraqqi, 5 July 1906Google Scholar; cf. the report on the incident in Russkii Turkestan, a Russian socialist newspaper, quoted in Vakhidov, Kh., Prosvetitel'skaia ideologiia v Turkestane (Tashkent, 1979), 77Google Scholar.

62 Khoja, Mahmud [Behbudi], “Bizni hallar wa ishlar,” Ayna, 18 January 1914, 200–2Google Scholar.

63 Robinson, Francis, “Technology and Religious Change: Islam and the Impact of Print,” Modern Asian Studies 27 (1993): 232–33, 240–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Allworth, Central Asian Publishing, 16ሓ38Google Scholar.