Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:40:19.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE OTTOMAN LEGACY IN COLD WAR MODERNIZATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Nathan J. Citino
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 19 March 1877, the first Ottoman parliament opened at Dolmabahçe Palace when Sultan Abdülhamit II crossed a velvet carpet to stand beside a golden throne. Seen later as the finale of the Tanzimat reform era, the parliament appeared to diplomatic observers as the strategy of former grand vizier Midhat Paşa. Midhat's constitutionalism was a plan for “reform, revival, and indeed survival” that included seeking allies against Russia and containing Russian influence in the Balkans. Abdülhamit listened as his secretary charged the new body: “The progress effected by civilised states, the security and wealth they enjoy, are the fruit of the participation of all in the enactment of laws and in the administration of public affairs.” Among the most urgent priorities was “the development of agriculture and industry, and the progress of civilisation and of public wealth.” Parliament later responded with a pledge to deliver the empire from its malaise, to “eliminate the last traces of abuses, the heritage of the regime of despotism.”

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , November 2008 , pp. 579 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

Author's Note: For their helpful comments, I thank Carter V. Findley, Robert Vitalis, my Colorado State University colleagues and graduate students, and the anonymous reviewers for IJMES. The Earhart Foundation provided valuable research support.

1 Hasan, Kayalı, Arabs and Young Turks: Ottomanism, Arabism, and Islamism in the Ottoman Empire, 1908–1918 (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1997), 25Google Scholar. See also Davison, Roderic, Reform in the Ottoman Empire, 1856–1876 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963), 358–408Google Scholar.

2 Bey, Ali Haydar Midhat, The Life of Midhat Pasha: A Record of His Services, Political Reforms, Banishment, and Judicial Murder (London: John Murray, 1903), 157, 159Google Scholar; Shaw, Stanford J. and Shaw, Ezel Kural, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, 2 vols. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Reform, Revolution, and Republic: The Rise of Modern Turkey, 1808–1975, 2:182.

3 McGhee, George C., Envoy to the Middle World: Adventures in Diplomacy (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1983), 81Google Scholar; United States Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States [FRUS] 1949, The Near East, South Asia, and Africa, 9 vols. (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1977), 6:176.

4 Cold War historians have continued to use “Third World” even as they have challenged the marginalization of postcolonial societies signified by that term. For some scholars, it is helpful in evoking Americans' “Cold War perceptions” of such societies. See Westad, Odd Arne, “The New International History of the Cold War: Three (Possible) Paradigms,” Diplomatic History 24 (2000): 561CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Westad, Odd Arne, The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also The Eisenhower Administration, the Third World, and the Globalization of the Cold War, ed. Statler, Kathryn and Johns, Andrew (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006)Google Scholar.

6 See Yaqub, Salim, Containing Arab Nationalism: The Eisenhower Doctrine and the Middle East (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

7 See Gilman, Nils, Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003)Google Scholar, and Latham, Michael, Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and “Nation Building” in the Kennedy Era (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

8 See Brown, David S., Richard Hofstadter: An Intellectual Biography (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Rossinow, Doug, Visions of Progress: The Left-Liberal Tradition in America (Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

9 See Gendzier, Irene L., Managing Political Change: Social Scientists and the Third World (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

10 See Said, Edward, Orientalism (New York: Vintage Books, 1978), 284–328Google Scholar.

11 Lockman, Zachary, Contending Visions of the Middle East: The History and Politics of Orientalism (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Islamoğlu, Huri and Keyder, Çağlar, “Agenda for Ottoman History,” Review 1 (1977): 31–55Google Scholar.

13 Gelvin, James L., “The ‘Politics of Notables’ Forty Years After,” MESA Bulletin 40 (June 2006): 22Google Scholar.

14 Findley, Carter Vaughn, Ottoman Civil Officialdom: A Social History (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989), 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 See, for instance, Gaddis, John Lewis, The Cold War: A New History (New York: Penguin Press, 2005)Google Scholar, and LaFeber, Walter, America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2006, 10th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008)Google Scholar. An exception, Kuniholm, Bruce R., The Origins of the Cold War in the Near East: Great Power Conflict and Diplomacy in Iran, Turkey, and Greece (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, retains the emphasis on superpower rivalry.

16 See Citino, Nathan J. “Out of the Blue? Historical Scholarship on U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East,” Magazine of History 20 (May 2006): 8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 See Bunton, Martin, Colonial Land Policies in Palestine, 1917–1936 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 For reinterpretations of the land code, see Doumani, Beshara, Rediscovering Palestine: Merchants and Peasants in Jabal Nablus, 1700–1900 (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1995), 159Google Scholar, and An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914, ed. İnalcık, Halil with Quataert, Donald (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 856–61Google Scholar.

19 Fourth Meeting, Group on the Near and Middle East, 1947–48, 20 February 1948, Folder 5, Box 140, Records of the Council on Foreign Relations, Series 3, Seeley G. Mudd Library, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J. [CFR].

20 Second Meeting, Group on the Moslem World, 1948–49, 24 January 1949, Folder 6, Box 141, CFR.

21 Fourth Meeting, Group on the Moslem World, 1948–49, 9 May 1949, ibid.

22 Tannous, Afif I., Village Roots and Beyond: Memoirs of Afif I. Tannous (Lebanon, Beirut: Dar Nelson, 2004), 83, 104, 200Google Scholar.

23 See interview with Afif I. Tannous, Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Library of Congress, http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mfdip.2004tan01 (accessed 2 April 2008).

24 Tannous, Afif I., “Land Reform: Key to the Development and Stability of the Arab World,” Middle East Journal 5 (1951): 3, 6, 20Google Scholar.

25 See Tannous, Village Roots and Beyond, 220.

26 McGhee to Truman, 28 August 1950, FRUS, 1950, The Near East, South Asia, and Africa, 7 vols. (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1978), 5:178–80.

27 Memo by Burns, “The Dujaila Settlement in Iraq,” 22 May 1951, Folder: 1. Agriculture–Iraq 1. Land Reform a. Dujaila Project, Box 6, Lot 55 D 643, Office of Near Eastern, South Asian, and African Affairs, Subject Files Related to Economic Affairs, 1947–51, Record Group [RG] 59, National Archives and Records Administration [NARA], College Park, Md.

28 See Tannous, “Land Reform,” 16, and Burns, “The Dujaila Settlement in Iraq,” 11.

29 Land Tenure, ed. Parsons, Kenneth H. et al. (Madison, Wisc.: University of Wisconsin Press, 1956), 36–44Google Scholar.

30 Ibid., 84, 92.

31 “Conference on World Land Tenure Problems,” State Department Bulletin 25 (22 October 1951): 660.

32 United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine, Final Report of the Economic Survey Mission for the Middle East (Lake Success, N.Y.: United Nations, 1949)Google Scholar.

33 U.S. Congress, House, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Palestine Refugees, 81 Cong., 2 sess., 16 February 1950, 9.

34 Memo by Root, 2 April 1951, FRUS, 1951, The Near East and Africa, 7 vols. (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1982), 5: 613.

35 Undated memo, “Middle East Refugee Problems,” printed in U.S. Congress, House, Foreign Relations Committee, Mutual Security Program, 82 Cong., 1 sess., 765.

36 Fourth Meeting, Group on the Political Implications of Economic Development, 1951–52, 5 June 1952, Folder 2, Box 149, CFR. On Syria and Point Four, see al-ʿAzm, Khalid, Mudhakkirat Khalid al-ʿAzm, 3 vols. (Beirut: Dar al-Mattahida li-l-Nashr, 1973), 2:433, 3:379Google Scholar.

37 Bergus to Sands, 1 November 1951, Folder: Agricultural—General 2. Land Reform a. General Information, Box 10, Lot 55, D 643, RG 59, NARA.

38 On Midhat's experience with these issues as Baghdad governor, see Owen, Roger, The Middle East in the World Economy, 1800–1914, rev. ed. (New York: I. B. Tauris, 1993), 187Google Scholar.

39 Loftus to McGhee, 7 December 1950, Loose Papers, Box 2, Lot 55, D 643, RG 59, NARA.

40 Bergus to Sands.

41 See Boardman to Sands, 15 October 1951, Folder: Agricultural—General 2. Land Reform a. U.S. Policy, Box 10, Lot 55 D 643, RG 59, NARA.

42 See Hahn, Peter L., “Containment and Egyptian Nationalism: The Unsuccessful Effort to Establish the Middle East Command, 1950–53,” Diplomatic History 11 (Winter 1987): 23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 See McGhee, George C., “United States Policy toward the Middle East,” State Department Bulletin 25 (30 July 1951): 177–78Google Scholar.

44 McGhee, George C., “Bolstering the Near East and Africa as a Barrier to Aggression,” State Department Bulletin 25 (6 August 1951): 216Google Scholar; McGhee, “United States Policy toward the Middle East,” 175.

45 Executive Sessions of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, vol. 3, part 1, 82 Cong., 1 sess., 17 April 1951 (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1976), 438–44.

46 House, Committee on Appropriations, Mutual Security Program Appropriations for 1952, 82 Cong., 1 sess., Pt. 1, 2 October 1951, 454.

47 Alterman, Jon B., Egypt and American Foreign Assistance, 1952–1956: Hopes Dashed (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Ibid., 95.

49 147th Meeting of the National Security Council, 1 June 1953, Box 4, NSC Series, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Papers as President of the United States, 1953–61, Eisenhower Presidential Library, Abilene, Kans.

50 See Gendzier, Managing Political Change, 130–33, and Lerner, Daniel, The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East (New York: The Free Press, 1958)Google Scholar.

51 Thornburg, Max Weston et al. , Turkey: An Economic Appraisal, reprint ed. (New York: Greenwood Press, 1968), 18, 19Google Scholar; FRUS, 1949, 6: 1664.

52 Entry for 22 May 1953, 1 January–30 June 1953, Box 3, Max W. Ball Papers, Truman Presidential Library, Independence, Mo.

53 See First Meeting of Group on The Middle East and Modern Islam, 1958–59, 5 November 1958, Folder 1, Box 166, CFR; H. A. R. Gibb and Bowen, Harold, Islamic Society and the West: A Study of the Impact of Western Civilization on Moslem Culture in the Near East (London: Oxford University Press, 1950, 1957)Google Scholar.

54 See Paths to the Middle East: Ten Scholars Look Back, ed. Naff, Thomas (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1993), 263–91Google Scholar. See also The Politics of the Developing Areas, ed. Almond, Gabriel A. and Coleman, James S. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1960)Google Scholar; Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey, ed. Rustow, Dankwart A. and Ward, Robert (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1964)Google Scholar; and Rustow, Dankwart A., A World of Nations: Problems of Political Modernization (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1967)Google Scholar.

55 See Folder 5, Box 157; Folder 4, Box 164; and Folder 3, Box 171, CFR.

56 Third Meeting, Group on the Near and Middle East, 1947–48, 18 December 1947, Folder 5, Box 140, CFR.

57 Fourth Meeting, Group on the Near and Middle East, 1947–48, 20 February 1948, ibid.

58 Fourth Meeting, Group on American Policy in the Middle East, 1951–52, 3 March 1952, Folder 4, Box 148, CFR.

59 Ibid.

60 Dankwart A. Rustow, “Turkey—Cornerstone of Western Defense in the Near East,” 15 December 1954, Folder 5, Box 157, CFR.

61 See Folder 4, Box 164, CFR.

62 Edwin J. Cohn, “Turkish Development: 1922–57,” 16 September 1957, ibid. See also Cohn, Edwin J., Turkish Economic, Social, and Political Change: The Development of a More Prosperous and Open Society (New York: Praeger, 1970)Google Scholar.

63 First Meeting, Group on Human Factors in Economic Development, 1957–58, 14 October 1957, Folder 4, Box 164, CFR.

64 J. C. Hurewitz, “Military Modernizers: Similarity and Difference in the Turkish and Egyptian Experiences,” and Second Meeting, Group on the Role of the Military in the Middle East, 26 November 1963, Folder 3, Box 174, CFR. See also Hurewitz, J. C., Middle East Politics: The Military Dimension (New York: Praeger, 1969), 420–26Google Scholar.

65 See Rustow, Dankwart A., “The Army and the Founding of the Turkish Republic,” World Politics 11 (1959): 513–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Lewis, Bernard, The Emergence of Modern Turkey (London: Oxford University Press, 1961), ixGoogle Scholar.

66 Lerner, Daniel and Robinson, Richard D., “Swords and Ploughshares: The Turkish Army as a Modernizing Force,” World Politics 13 (October 1960): 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 See the interview with İnalcık, Halil in Approaches to the History of the Middle East: Interviews with Leading Middle East Historians, ed. Gallagher, Nancy Elizabeth (Reading, U.K.: Ithaca Press, 1994), 151–70Google Scholar.

68 Howard, Douglas A., “Ottoman Historiography and the Literature of ‘Decline’ of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,” Journal of Asian History 22 (1988): 76Google Scholar.

69 See Bertold Spuler's review, Oriens 4 (31 December 1951): 304–307, and Bernard Lewis's, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 16 (1954): 598–600.

70 Makdisi, Ussama, “Ottoman Orientalism,” American Historical Review 107 (2002): 769CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Findley, Carter V., “Mouradgea D'Ohsson (1740–1807): Liminality and Cosmopolitanism in the Author of the Tableau Général de L'empire Othman,” Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 22 (1998): 34Google Scholar.

72 Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society and the West, part 1, 16.

73 Faroqhi, Suraiya, Approaching Ottoman History: An Introduction to the Sources (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society and the West, part 1, 180, 196; part 2, 84.

75 Gibb and Bowen, Islamic Society and the West, part 1, 206.

76 Rustow review, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 318 (1958): 153–54.

77 Almond and Coleman, The Politics of the Developing Areas, 378.

78 See Lerner and Robinson, “Swords and Ploughshares,” 19; Frey, Frederick W., The Turkish Political Elite (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1965), 32 (n. 8)Google Scholar; Lerner, The Passing of Traditional Society, 129; Halpern, Manfred, The Politics of Social Change in the Middle East and North Africa (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963), 90Google Scholar; and Lerner, Daniel, “Toward a Communication Theory of Modernization: A Set of Considerations,” in Communications and Political Development, ed. Pye, Lucian (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963), 340 (n. 8)Google Scholar.

79 Calverly review, American Sociological Review 15 (1950): 819; Berger review, American Sociological Review 23 (1958): 115. See also Morroe Berger, Bureaucracy and Society in Modern Egypt: A Study of the Higher Civil Service (New York: Russell & Russell, 1957), 20 (n. 3), 119 (n. 9).

80 Eisenstadt, S. N., The Political Systems of Empires (New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1963), 5, 347Google Scholar. See also Brecht, Arnold, “How Bureaucracies Develop and Function,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 292 (March 1954): 5 (n. 5)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Presthus, Robert V., “The Social Bases of Bureaucratic Organization,” Social Forces 38 (December 1959): 108 (n. 11)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eisenstadt, S. N., “Bureaucracy, Bureaucratization, and Debureaucratization,” Administrative Science Quarterly 4 (December 1959): 318 (n. 17)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Parsons, Talcott, “Evolutionary Universals in Society,” American Sociological Review 29 (1964): 348 (n. 17)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Third Meeting, Ad Hoc Group on Diplomacy and the Developing Countries, 10 April 1961, Folder 3, Box 171, CFR.

82 Rustow and Ward, Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey, 11, 256, 302–5, 357–58, 414–15.

83 See Lewis, The Emergence of Modern Turkey; Mardin, Şerif, The Genesis of Young Ottoman Thought: A Study in the Modernization of Turkish Political Ideas (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Davison, Reform in the Ottoman Empire; and Berkes, Niyazi, The Development of Secularism in Turkey (Montreal: McGill University Press, 1964)Google Scholar.

84 Apter, David E., The Politics of Modernization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), 154Google Scholar.

85 See “Foreword” by Lerner and Lasswell in Frey, The Turkish Political Elite, ix, xi, and Lewis, Emergence of Modern Turkey, 3, 273, 479.

86 Lewis, Emergence of Modern Turkey, 477.

87 Davison, Reform in the Ottoman Empire, vii.

88 Quataert, Donald, “Ottoman History Writing at a Crossroads,” in Turkish Studies in the United States, ed. Quataert, Donald and Sayarı, Sabri (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 2003), 17Google Scholar.

89 See Lockman, Contending Visions of the Middle East, 162–71.

90 See Hathaway, Jane, The Politics of Households in Ottoman Egypt: The Rise of the Qazdağlıs (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

91 See Robins, Philip, Suits and Uniforms: Turkish Foreign Policy since the Cold War (Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Press, 2003), 130–32Google Scholar; Uslu, Nasuh, The Turkish–American Relationship between 1947 and 2003: The History of a Distinctive Alliance (New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2003), 135–90Google Scholar; Rustow, Dankwart A., Turkey: America's Forgotten Ally (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1987), 46–47Google Scholar; and Harriman to Johnson, 23 December 1965, FRUS, 1964–1968, Vietnam June–December 1965, 34 vols. (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1996), 3:686.

92 See Gilman, Nils, “Modernization Theory, the Highest Stage of American Intellectual History,” in Staging Growth: Modernization, Development, and the Global Cold War, ed. Engerman, David C. et al. (Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press, 2003), 70–75Google Scholar; and Ehrman, John, The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs, 1945–1994 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1995), 173–92Google Scholar.

93 U.S. Congress, House, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Human Rights and International Organizations, Human Rights in Cyprus, Greece, and Turkey, 98 Cong., 1 Sess., 14 April 1983, 5, 6.

94 Rustow, Turkey: America's Forgotten Ally, 64, 125.

95 Ibid., ix.

96 McGhee, George C., The U.S.–Turkish–NATO Middle East Connection: How the Truman Doctrine Contained the Soviets in the Middle East (New York: St. Martin's, 1990), 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.