Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:08:28.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes and Comments

Gunter Response to Dadrian Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Michael M. Gunter
Michael M. Gunter
Affiliation:
Department of Political ScienceTennessee Technological University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , November 1987 , pp. 523 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dadrian, Vahakn N., “The Naim-Andonian Documents on the World War I Destruction of Ottoman Armenians: The Anatomy of a Genocide,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 18 (08 1986), 311–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Andonian, Aram, ed., The Memoirs of Naim Bey: Turkish Official Documents Relating to the Deportations and Massacres of Armenians (London, 1920; reprinted, Newton Square, Penn.: Armenian Historical Research Association, 1964), a collection of documents purporting to be official telegrams sent in code by Talaat Pasha and other Ottoman officials to order “genocide” against the Armenians. These so-called documents first emerged soon after World War I in an apparent attempt by certain Armenian circles to impress favorably the Paris Peace Conference. The Allies evidently recognized them as forgeries even then, for they were not utilized against Ottoman officials accused of war crimes even though they were readily available.Google Scholar

3 Orel, Şinasi and Yuca, Süreyya, The Talat Pasha Telegrams: Historical Fact or Armenian Fiction? (Nicosia, 1986).Google Scholar

4 Dadrian, “Naim-Andonian Documents,” p. 325.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., p. 338. Although there is no doubt that several hundred thousand Ottoman Armenians did die, the Armenians probably exaggerate these numbers. See McCarthy, Justin, Muslims and Minorities: The Population of Ottoman Anatolia and the End of the Empire (New York and London, 1983), p. 130.Google Scholar

6 Hovannisian, Richard G., Armenia on the Road to Independence, 1918 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1967), p. 274, n. 47.Google Scholar

7 Rifat, Mevlan Zade, Türkiye inkilabinin ic yüzü [The inner aspects of the Turkish Revolution] (Aleppo, 1929).Google Scholar The French author so sympathetic to the Armenian cause, Yves Ternon, also concluded that Rifat's “document seems apocryphal,” explaining its creation “by the need for Rifat, a Kurd, to discredit the Young Turk and Kemalist regimes in order to facilitate an Armeno-Kurdish rapprochement by lessening the responsibilities of the Kurds in the massacres.” Ternon, Yves, The Armenian Cause (Delmar, N.Y., 1985), p. 243 n. 20.Google Scholar