Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:07:46.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MAMLUKS IN OTTOMAN TUNISIA: A CATEGORY CONNECTING STATE AND SOCIAL FORCES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2016

M'hamed Oualdi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines how administrative documents categorized the mamluks who served Ottoman governors of Tunis from the early 18th to the mid-19th century. The categorization of these state slaves-cum-servants illuminates three issues, namely, the relationships between Islamic states and societies, interactions between the Ottoman Empire and its provinces, and forms of military slavery around the globe. Seeing registers, letters, and historical chronicles as spaces of interaction allows us to break free from an a priori definition of mamluks. By exploring how slaves and servants contributed to defining themselves in administrative documents, I not only argue for a new understanding of the mamluk category, but also show that mamluks did not separate state and society. On the contrary, in the Tunisian case, mamluks connected the state to various imperial and provincial social forces.

Keywords

elitesmamluksOttoman historyslaverysocial history
Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , August 2016 , pp. 473 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

Author's note: I thank the following people whose comments, questions, and corrections were crucial to improving this article: the anonymous IJMES reviewers, Michael Cook, Cyrus Schayegh, Muriam Haleh Davis, Marius Hentea, Kate Epstein, William Blair, and Nilüfer Hatemi. This article was written with the support of Princeton University and the École française de Rome. I presented an earlier version of it at the History Department Colloquium convened by Laura Lee Downs and Luca Molà in December 2015 at the European University Institute (Florence).

1 Grandchamp, Pierre, “Un mameluk tunisien d'origine française, le colonel Selim Corso, alias Joseph Marini,” Revue tunisienne 27–28 (1936): 467–73Google Scholar.

2 Ayalon, David, The Mamluk Military Society (London: Variorum Reprints, 1979)Google Scholar.

3 Kunt, Metin, The Sultan's Servants: The Transformation of Ottoman Provincial Government, 1550–1650 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Toledano, Ehud R., “Late Ottoman Concepts of Slavery (1830s–1880s),” Poetics Today 14 (1993): 477–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Toledano, “Late Ottoman Concepts,” 497. On the spread of the “mamluk phenomenon,” see Brown, Christopher Leslie, “The Arming of Slaves in Comparative Perspective,” in Arming Slaves: From Classical Times to the Modern Age, ed. Brown, Christopher Leslie and Morgan, Philip D. (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2006), 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 On European captives, see Davis, Robert C., Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, The Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500–1800 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)Google Scholar; Weiss, Gillian, Captives and Corsairs: France and Slavery in the Early Modern Mediterranean (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Sears, Christine E., American Slaves and African Masters: Algiers and the Western Sahara, 1776–1820 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On West African slaves in Tunis, see Montana, Ismael M., The Abolition of Slavery in Ottoman Tunisia (Gainesville, Fl.: University Press of Florida, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Inès Mrad-Dali, “Identités multiples et multitudes d'histoire: Les ‘Noirs tunisiens’ de 1846 à aujourd'hui” (PhD diss., EHESS-Paris, 2009).

6 Crecelius, Daniel, “The Mamluk Beylicate of Egypt in the Last Decade before Its Destruction by Muhammad ʿAli Pasha in 1811,” in The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society, ed. Phillip, Thomas and Haarmaan, Ulrich (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 130–32Google Scholar; Carl Brown, L., The Tunisia of Ahmad Bey, 1837–1855 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1974), 48Google Scholar; Tunisian State Archives (hereafter TSA), register (hereafter reg.) 436 bis, folio (hereafter f.) 84, from 25–26 April to 24 July 1826.

7 Edward Philips, John, “The Persistence of Slave Officials in the Sokoto Caliphate,” in Slave Elites in the Middle East and Africa: A Comparative Study, ed. Tora, Miura and Edward Philips, John (New York: Kegan Paul, 2000), 233Google Scholar.

8 Blaydes, Lisa and Chaney, Eric, “The Feudal Revolution and Europe's Rise: Political Divergence of the Christian West and the Muslim World before 1500 CE,” American Political Science Review 107 (2013): 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 22.

9 Philips, “The Persistence of Slave Officials,” 216.

10 Ze'evi, Dror, “Kul and Getting Cooler: The Dissolution of Elite Collective Identity and the Formation of Official Nationalism in the Ottoman Empire,” Mediterranean Historical Review 11 (1996): 180CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Ze'evi does not hold this view, but rather attributes it to Pipes, Daniel, Slave Soldiers and Islam: The Genesis of a Military System (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

11 Philips, “The Persistence of Slave Officials,” 233.

12 Rapoport, Yossef, “New Directions in the Social History of the Mamluk Era,” in History and Society during the Mamluk Period (1250–1517): Studies of the Annemarie Schimmel Research College I, ed. Connerman, Stephan (Bonn: V and R Unipress, Bonn University Press, 2014), 143–55Google Scholar; Lev, Yaacov, “David Ayalon (1914–1998) and the History of Black Military Slavery in Medieval Islam,” Der Islam 90 (2013): 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eychenne, Mathieu, “David Ayalon et l'historiographie de l'armée mamelouke,” in La guerre dans le Proche-Orient medieval (Xe–XVe siècles), ed. Eychenne, Mathieu and Zouache, Abbès (Cairo: IFPO-IFAO, 2014), 143–77Google Scholar, 421–75.

13 Toledano, Ehud R., “Enslavement in the Ottoman Empire in the Early Modern Period,” in The Cambridge World History of Slavery, ed. Eltis, David and Engerman, Stanley L. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 3:28Google Scholar.

14 Toledano, “Late Ottoman Concepts,” 483.

15 Harrak, Fatima, “Mawlay Ismaʿil's Jaysh al-ʿAbid: Reassessment of a Military Experience,” in Slave Elites in the Middle East and Africa: A Comparative Study, ed. Tora, Miura and Philips, John Edward (New York: Kegan Paul, 2000), 179–88Google Scholar; Hamel, Chouki El, Black Morocco: A History of Slavery, Race, and Islam (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar.

16 Ennaji, Mohammed, Soldats, Domestiques et Concubines: L'esclavage au Maroc au XIXe siècle (Rabat: Balland-Le Nadir, 1994), 127Google Scholar; Zilfi, Madeline C., Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 206Google Scholar; Erdem, Y. Hakan, Slavery in the Ottoman Empire and Its Demise, 1800–1909 (New York: Saint-Martin's Press, 1996), 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Toledano, “Late Ottoman Concepts,” 483; Ennaji, Soldats, Domestiques, 143–44.

18 Michael Winter, “The Re-emergence of the Mamluks Following the Ottoman Conquest,” in The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society, 106; Jane Hathaway, “‘Mamluk Households’ and ‘Mamluk’ Factions in Ottoman Egypt: A Reconsideration,” in The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society, 107–17; Toledano, Ehud R., Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle East (Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Press, 1998), 28Google Scholar.

19 Hathaway, , “‘Mamluk households,’” 110; Hathaway, The Politics of the Households in Ottoman Egypt: The Rise of the Qazdaǧlis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 22Google Scholar.

20 Toledano, “Enslavement in the Ottoman Empire,” 34.

21 Brown, “The Arming of Slaves,” 336; Bernand, Carmen, “Des Mamlûks à Colin Powell,” in D'esclaves à soldats: Miliciens et soldats d'origine servile XIIIe-XXIe siècles, ed. Bernand, Carmen and Stella, Alessandro (Paris: L'Harmattan, 2006), 387–88Google Scholar.

22 Brown, “The Arming of Slaves,” 346.

23 Lev, “David Ayalon,” 40; Stilwell, Sean, Paradoxes of Power: The Kano “Mamluks” and Male Royal Slavery in the Sokoto Caliphate, 1804–1903 (Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann, 2004), 8–9Google Scholar.

24 Erdem, Y. Hakan, “Magic, Theft, and Arson: The Life and Death of an Enslaved African Woman in Ottoman Izmit,” in Race and Slavery in the Middle East: Histories of Trans-Saharan Africans in Nineteenth-Century Egypt, Sudan, and the Ottoman Mediterranean, ed. Walz, Terence and Cuno, Kenneth M. (Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 2010), 125Google Scholar.

25 Troutt Powell, Eve M., “Will That Subaltern Ever Speak? Finding African Slaves in the Historiography of the Middle East,” in Middle East Historiographies: Narrating the Twentieth Century, ed. Gershoni, Israel, Singer, Amy, and Erdem, Y. Hakan (Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Press, 2006), 245Google Scholar.

26 Erdem, “Magic, Theft, and Arson,” 126.

27 Toledano, Ehud R., As If Silent and Absent: Bonds of Enslavement in the Islamic Middle East (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2007), 34–35Google Scholar.

28 Shariʿa court records used mainly to study societies and slavery within the Ottoman province might have been produced in Tunis, but they were not preserved or at least have not yet been found. Simona Cerutti, ``Microhistory: Social Relations Versus Cultural Models?,'' in Between Sociology and History: Essays on Microhistory, Collective Action, and Nation-Building, ed. A. M. Castrén, M. Lonkila, and M. Peltonen (Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 2004), 17–40.

29 Stoler, Ann, “Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance: On the Content in the Form,” Archival Science 2 (2002): 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hans, Stefan and Schiel, Julian, “Semantics, Practices and Transcultural Perspectives on Mediterranean Slavery,” in Mediterranean Slavery Revisited (500–1800). Neue Perspektiven auf Mediterrane Sklaverei (500–1800), ed. Hans, Stefan and Schiel, Julian (Zurich: Chronos Verlag, 2014), 15Google Scholar, 17.

30 Torre, Angelo, “‘Faire communauté’: Confréries et localité dans une vallée du Piémont (XVIIe–XVIIIe siècle),” Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 62 (2007): 105Google Scholar.

31 Toledano, As If Silent, 33.

32 Toledano, Ehud R., “The Emergence of Ottoman-Local Elites (1700–1900): A Framework for Research,” in Middle Eastern Politics and Ideas: A History from Within; Essays in Honour of Albert Hourani, ed. Pappé, Ilan and Ma'oz, Moshe (New York: Tauris Academic Studies, 1997), 145–62Google Scholar.

33 There are several historians who have explored the history of North Africa in an Ottoman context. See Abderrahman El Moudden, “Sharifs and Padishahs: Moroccan–Ottoman Relations from the 16th through the 18th Centuries: Contribution to the Study of a Diplomatic Culture” (PhD diss., Princeton University, 1992); Shuval, Tal, “Cezayr-i Garb: Bringing Algeria Back into Ottoman History,” New Perspectives on Turkey 22 (2000): 85–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Moalla, Asma, The Regency of Tunis and the Ottoman Porte 1777–1814: Army and Government of a North-African Ottoman Eyālet at the End of the Eighteenth Century (London: Routledge Curzon, 2003)Google Scholar.

34 TSA, reg. 36, f. 56, 1742-1743 (1155). For instance, Husayn al-Kulughli, one of Yunis's mamluks, was the child of an Ottoman Janissary and a native woman.

35 Toledano, “The Emergence of Ottoman-Local Elites,” 155.

36 Brunschvig, La Berbérie orientale, 1:440–69, 2:48.

37 Larguèche, Dalenda, “The Mahalla: The Origins of Beylical Sovereignty in Ottoman Tunisia during the Early Modern Period,” Journal of North African Studies 6 (2001): 105–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Cherif, Mohamed-Hédi, Pouvoir et société dans la Tunisie de H'usayn bin ʿAli (Tunis: Université de Tunis, 1984), 86–87Google Scholar.

39 Hathaway, , “‘Mamluk households,’” 110; Hathaway, The Politics of the Households; Tal Shuval, La ville d'Alger vers la fin du XVIIIe siècle (Paris: CNRS editions, 1998)Google Scholar.

40 Dinar, Mubammad ibn Abi al-Qasim ibn Abi (hereafter Dinar), al-Muʾnis fi Akhbar Ifriqiyya wa-Tunis, ed. Shammam, Muhammad (Tunis: al-Maktaba al-ʿAtiqa, 1967), 228Google Scholar.

41 Fakhfakh, Moncef, Sommaire des registres administratifs et fiscaux aux archives nationales tunisiennes (Tunis: Publication des Archives nationales tunisiennes, 1990), 20–21Google Scholar; Kallander, Amy Aisen, Women, Gender, and the Palace Households in Ottoman Tunisia (Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press, 2013), 25–26Google Scholar.

42 Fakhfakh, Sommaire des registres, 27; Troutt Powell, Eve M., Tell This in My Memory: Stories of Enslavement in Egypt, Sudan and the Ottoman Empire (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2012), 99Google Scholar.

43 Stefan Hans, “Gefangen und versklavt: Muslimische Sklaven aus der Seeschlacht von Lepanto in Rom,” in Mediterranean Slavery Revisited, 337.

44 Larguèche, , “The Mahalla”; Jocelyne Dakhlia, “Dans la mouvance du prince: La symbolique du pouvoir itinérant au Maghreb,” Annales: Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations 43 (1998): 735–60Google Scholar; al-Azizi, Muhammad al-Habib, “Mahalla al-Shitaʾ wa-l-Sayf,” Cahiers de Tunisie 172 (1996): 13–49Google Scholar.

45 TSA, reg. 11.

46 TSA, reg. 27.

47 TSA, reg. 85.

48 TSA, reg. 143, f. 71, 1764 (1178); reg. 239, f. 83, 28 August 1785 (22 shawwāl 1199); reg. 3638, f. 6–9, 1804–9 (1229–24); reg. 3712, f. 5–8, 1882–83 (1300).

49 TSA, reg. 180, f. 78, August–September 1772 (jumādā II 1186); TSA, reg. 427, f. 27, June–July 1824 (dhu al-qaʿda 1239).

50 Veinstein, Gilles, “L'empire dans sa grandeur (XVIe siècle),” in Histoire de l'Empire Ottoman, ed. Mantran, Robert (Paris: Fayard, 1989), 177–84Google Scholar; Nieuwenhuis, Tom, Politics and Society in Early Modern Iraq: Mamlūk Pashas, Tribal Shaykhs and Local Rule between 1802 and 1831 (The Hague: M. Nijhoff Publishers, 1982), 26–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Muhammad Fawzi Al-Mustghanimi, “Bilat Bardu fi Zaman Hammuda Basha (1782–1814)” (PhD diss., Tunis University, 2007), 208–9.

52 Hathaway, The Politics of the Households, 169; Venture de Paradis, Jean-Marie, Tunis et Alger au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Sindbad, 1983), 72, 74Google Scholar; Monchicourt, Charles, Documents historiques sur la Tunisie: Relations inédites de Nyssen, Filippi et Calligaris (1788, 1829, 1834) (Paris: Société d’éditions géographiques, maritimes et coloniales, 1929), 13Google Scholar.

53 TSA, reg. 35, f. 120, summer 1739 (1152).

54 Demeerseman, André, Aspects de la société tunisienne d'après Ibn Abî L-Dhiyâf (Tunis: Institut des Belles Lettres Arabes, 1996), 61Google Scholar; Brown, Tunisia, 51.

55 Monchicourt, Charles, “Notice sur Tunez et biographie du Bach Mamelouk Hassine par Louis Calligaris,” Revue d'histoire des colonies françaises 16 (1928): 584Google Scholar.

56 TSA, reg. 5, f. 31–36, 1716–18 (1129–30); reg. 85, f. 162–65, 1755–57 (1169–70); reg. 101, f. 131–39, March 1758 (rajab 1171); reg. 141, f. 148–59, 1766–67 (1180); reg. 180, f. 86, 156, 177, 1772–73 (1186); reg. 192, f. 106, 156, 210, 1775–76 (1189); reg. 277, f. 50–52, 1794–95 (1209); reg 327, f. 103–4, 1803–4 (1218); reg. 335, f. 35, 108–10, 1805 (1220); reg. 440/2, f. 77–78, 109–10, 1829–30 (1245); reg. 448/2, f. 32–33, f. 93–94, 1834–35 (1250); reg. 451/2, f. 91, 1835–36 (1251).

57 Zilfi, Women and Slavery, 213, 235.

58 Heinrich von Puckler-Muskau, Hermann Ludwig, Chroniques, lettres et journal de voyage, extraits des papiers d'un défunt (Paris: Fournier jeune, 1837), 3:284Google Scholar.

59 TSA, reg. 74, f. 72, 1753 (summer 1166); reg. 85, f. 164, 1766 (summer 1180); reg. 156, f. 185, 1 September 1769 (29 rabīʿ al-thānī 1183); reg. 216, f. 151, 2 August 1779 (19 rajab 1193); reg. 436 bis, f. 84, 25 April 1826 (17 ramaḍān 1241); reg. 451/2, f. 91, 6 March 1836 (18 qaʿda 1251); reg. 453/2, f. 84, 28 January 1837 (20 shawwāl 1252); reg. 463/2, f. 81, 20 February 1840 (16 dhu al-ḥijja 1255).

60 Ze'evi, “Kul and Getting Cooler,” 185.

61 Crecelius, “The Mamluk Beylicate,” 135–38.

62 Toledano, As If Silent, 29; Erdem, Slavery in the Ottoman Empire, 44–54.

63 TSA, reg. 85, f. 162, September/October 1766 (rabīʿ al-thānī 1180); reg. 406, f. 93, 1 January 1817 (12 ṣafar 1232); TSA, reg. 50, f. 61, January–February 1748 (ṣafar 1161); Abi al-Diyaf, Ahmad ibn (hereafter Diyaf), Ithaf Ahl al-Zaman bi-Akhbar Muluk Tunis wa-ʿAhd al-Aman, 8 vols. (Tunis: Dar al-Tunisiyya li-l-nashr, 1989), 3:128Google Scholar.

64 Consul Devoize to French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 14 July 1806, f. 171, consular correspondence, French consulate in Tunis, Commercial Correspondence, vol. 38, Archives of French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Paris.

65 Findley, Carter Vaughn, Ottoman Civil Officialdom: A Social History (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989), 46–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 62. There is no specific study for the Tunisian case.

66 Muhammad Khaznadar to Shakir Sahib al-Tabiʿ, Tunis, 5 July 1832 (6 ṣafar 1248), document 2, file 92, box 9, History Series (hereafter HS), TSA.

67 Farhat al-Mamluk to Mustafa Khaznadar, Tunis, 30 April 1839 (15 ṣafar 1255), document 17, file 209, box 142, HS, TSA.

68 Al-Sadiq ibn ʿUthman al-Kaʿk al-Sharif to Ismaʿil Sahib al-Tabiʿ, Tunis, September/October 1863, document 56, 17, file 867, box 73, HS, TSA.

69 In the 17th century, Dinar wrote al-Muʾnis. In the second half of the 18th century, Hammuda ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAziz authored Tarikh al-Bashi (Tunis: Maison Tunisienne de l'Edition, 1970). For the 19th century, I would cite three major chronicles: al-Tunisi, Muhammad ibn Salama, al-ʿIqd al-Munaddad fi Akhbar al-Mushir Ahmad, Tunisian National Library, ms. 18618, 1849Google Scholar; Muhammad al-Baji al-Masʿudi, al-Khulasa al-Naqiyya fi Umaraʾ Ifriqiya (Tunis, 1905); and Diyaf, Ithaf Ahl al-Zaman.

70 Ulrich Haarman, “Joseph's Law—The Careers and Activities of Mamluk Descendants before the Ottoman Conquest of Egypt,” in The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society, 81.

71 Rosenthal, Franz, A History of Muslim Historiography (Leiden: Brill, 1952)Google Scholar; Abesselem, Ahmed, Les historiens tunisiens des XVIIe, XVIIIe et XIXe siècles: Essai d'histoire culturelle (Paris: Klincksieck, 1973)Google Scholar; Meier, Astrid, “Perceptions of a New Era? Historical Writing in Early Ottoman Damascus,” Arabica 51 (2004): 419–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 Diyaf, Ithaf Ahl al-Zaman, 2:178.

73 Diyaf, Ithaf Ahl al-Zaman, 3:22–23; Salama al-Tunisi, al-ʿIqd al-Munaddad, f. 37.

74 Toledano, “Late Ottoman Concepts,” 501; Ennaji, Soldats, Domestiques, 152–53.

75 Marmon, Shaun E, “Black Slaves in Mamlûk Narratives: Representations of Transgression,” Al-Qantara 28 (2007): 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 Gognalons, L., “Sens des mots ‘euldj’ et ‘euldjia,’” Bulletin des Etudes Arabes 3 (1943): 48–49Google Scholar; Dinar, al-Muʾnis, 209.

77 Ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAziz, Tarikh al-Bashi, 1:363; al-Baji al-Masʿudi, al-Khulasa, 135.

78 Diyaf, Ithaf Ahl al-Zaman, 7:29, 89, 113, 130.

79 Raymond, André and Kchir, Khaled, trans. and eds., Présent aux hommes de notre temps: Chronique des rois de Tunis et du pacte fondamental. Chapitre VI et V: Règne de Husaïn Bey et Mustafa Bey (Tunis: IRMC-ISHMN and Alif, 1994), 1:74Google Scholar.

80 Reuven Amitai, “The Mamluk Institution, or One Thousand Years of Military Slavery in the Islamic World,” in Arming Slaves, 68.

81 ibn Yusuf, Muhammad al-Saghir, Mechra el melki, chronique tunisienne (1705–1771) pour servir à l'histoire des quatre premiers beys de la famille Husaynite (Tunis: Bouslama, 1978), 131Google Scholar.

82 Ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAziz, Tarikh al-Bashi, 1:276–77; Valensi, Lucette, Mardochée Naggiar: Enquête sur un inconnu (Paris: Stock, 2008), 283–84Google Scholar.

83 Toledano, “Late Ottoman Concepts,” 483; Ennaji, Soldats, Domestiques, 143–44.

84 Glesener, Thomas, “Mamelouks et mercenaires: Les figures politiques de l'altérité en Méditerranée (XVe–XIXe siècle),” in Les musulmans dans l'histoire de l'Europe, ed. Dakhlia, Jocelyne and Kaiser, Wolfgang (Paris: Albin Michel, 2013), 461–501Google Scholar.

85 Toledano, Slavery and Abolition; Erdem, Slavery in the Ottoman Empire.

86 Toledano, “Enslavement in the Ottoman Empire,” 44.

87 Benbilghith, Chibani, “al-Dawr al-Jiniral Husayn fi al-Haraka al-Islahiyya bi-Tunis Khilal al-Nisf al-Thani min al-Qarn al-Tasiʿ ʿAshar,” Arab Historical Review for Ottoman Studies 11–12 (1995): 147–66Google Scholar; al-Tawili, Ahmad, al-Jiniral Husayn, Hayatuhu wa-Atharuhu (Tunis: s.n., 1994)Google Scholar.

88 Al-Raʾid al-Tunisi 3, 23 August 1860 (7 ṣafar 1277); al-Raʾid al-Tunisi 34, 18 May 1863 (29 dhu al-qaʿda 1279).

89 James Amelang, “Writing Chains: Slave Autobiography from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic,” in Mediterranean Slavery Revisited, 549–51.

90 Grandchamp, “Un mameluk tunisien,” 472.