Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:37:45.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Praise of the Caliphs: Re-Creating History from the Manāqib Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Asma Afsaruddin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Roughly around the end of the 7th century, a distinct genre of Islamic literature began to develop under the rubric fadāʾil (“virtues” or “excellences”) that praised the merits, for example, of reciting the Qurʾan, of the Companions of the Prophet, of performing religious duties such as hajj and jihad, and of sacred cities such as Jerusalem. The fadāʾil literature initially was a part of the burgeoning hadith corpus, and the fadāʾ-Qurʾ an traditions appear to be the oldest strand. A variant term for this type of tradition, especially with regard to the Companions of the Prophet, is manāqib (and less frequently, khasāʾ is). A survey of this kind of “praise” literature indicates that the terms manāqib and fadaāʾil could be used fairly interchangeably.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , August 1999 , pp. 329 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

Author's note: An abridged version of this paper was presented at the colloquium Hadith: Texts and History in March, 1998 held at the Centre for Islamic Studies, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.

1 Cf. The Encyclopaedia of Islam, new ed., ed. Gibb, H. et al. , s.v. “Fadila” (Leiden, 1960-; hereafter El2), 2:728–29.Google Scholar For a broad survey of the fadāʾil literature, see Gruber, Ernst August, Verdienst und Rang: Die Fadāʾil als literarisches und gesellschaftliches Problem im Islam (Freiburg im Breisgau, 1975), esp. 49–82 for the Fadāʾil buldān works and 83–93 for the Fadāʾil al-Qurʾāan works.Google Scholar

2 EI 2, 2:728.

3 See, however, Elad, Amikam, Medieval Jerusalem and Islamic Worship: Holy Places, Ceremonies, Pilgrimage (Leiden, 1995), 12 ff.Google Scholar, in which he discusses the historical value of the Fadāʾil al-Quds literature in reconstructing the early history of Jerusalem.

4 al-Tabari, Ahmad al-Muhibb, al-Riyād al-nadira fi manāqib al-ʾashara, ed. Abū'l-ʿAlāʾ, Muḥhammad Muṣṭafā (Cairo, n.d.).Google Scholar

5 al-Khwārazmī, Abū'l-Muʾyyad al-Muwaffaq, al-Manaqib (Najaf, 1965).Google Scholar For al-Khwāarazmī, see Brockelmann, Carl, Geschichte der arabischen Litteratur, suppl. (Leiden, 1943–1949), 1:623.Google Scholar

6 Zaman, Muhammad Qasim, Religion and Politics under the Early ʿAbbāsids: The Emergence of the Proto-Sunni Elite (Leiden, 1997), 18.Google Scholar For Goldziher's now seminal study, at least in Western scholarship, see Goldziher, Ignaz, Muslim Studies, trans. Barber, C. R. and Stern, S. M. (London, 1971), vol. 2, chap. 3.Google Scholar

7 Leder, Stefan, “The Literary Use of the Khabar,” in The Byzantine and the Early Islamic Near East: Problems in the Literary Source Material, ed. Cameron, Averil and Conrad, Lawrence L. (Princeton, N.J., 1992), 282.Google Scholar

8 Lassner, Jacob, Islamic Revolution and Historical Memory: An Inquiry into the Art of ʿAbbāsid Apologetics (New Haven, Conn., 1986), 31 and passim.Google Scholar

9 Juynboll, G. H. A., Muslim Tradition: Studies in Chronology, Provenance and Authorship of Early Hadith (Cambridge, 1983), 12–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and n. 10 citing Abī 'l-Hadid, Ibn, Sharh nahj al-balāgha, ed. Ibrāhīm, Muhammad Abū 'l-Fadl (Cairo, 1959–1964), 11:48 f., 338.Google Scholar

10 See al-Rāzī, ʿAbd al-Jalīl (d. after 1161), Kitāb al-Naqd, ed. Muhaddith, S. Jalāl al-Din (Tehran, 1952), 655–64.Google Scholaral-Tabrisī, Ahmad ibn ʿAli (fl. early 12th century), Kitāb al-Ihtijāj, ed. al-Khurasānī, Muhammad Baqir (Beirut, n.d.), 1:97 ff.Google Scholar, mentions that twelve men from among the Muhajirun, among whom Khalid ibn Saʿid ibn al-ʿAs was the most vocal, and six men from among the Ansar repudiated Abu Bakr: cf. Yaʿqūbī, Taʾrikh, ed. Houtsma, M. T. (Leiden, 1883), 2:137.Google Scholar

11 'l-Hadīd, Ibn Abī, Sharh nahj al-balāgha, 11:48 ff.Google Scholar

12 See Afsaruddin, Asma, A Shīʿ Polemic Against al-Jāhiz: The Bināʾ al-maqāla al-fātimiyya of Ahmad Ibn Tāwūs (Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University, 1993), chap. 4.Google Scholar

13 For a discussion of these debates, see ibid., chap. 3. For a fuller account of these events, cfHishām, Ibn, al-Sira al-nabawiyya, ed. Zakkar, Suhayl (Beirut, 1992), 1:332–35 for the mabit, and 1:335–39 for the ghār.Google Scholar

14 ʿAsakir, Ibn, Tarjamat al-imām ʿAli b. Abī Tālib min taʾrikh madīnat Dimashq (Beirut, 1975), 1:36 f.Google Scholar; cf. also al-Khwārazmī, , Manāqib, 19Google Scholar; al-Maghāzilī, Ibn (d. 1090), Manāqib amīr al-muʾminīn ʿli b. Abī Tālib ʿalayhi 'l-salām (Beirut, n.d.), 25–27.Google Scholar

15 See al-Athīr, Ibn, al-Kāmil fi 'l-taʾrfkh (Beirut, 1965), 2:57–60.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., 59; see also al-Tabarī, , Taʾrikh al-umam wa-'l-mulūk (Beirut, 1997), 1:540–41Google Scholar; Hisham, Ibn, Sira, 1:169.Google Scholar

17 See al-Tabarī, al-Muhibb, al-Riyād al-nadira, 1:101–2.Google Scholar

18 For whom, see Hajar, Ibn (d. 1449), al-lsāba fi tamyīz al-sahāba (Beirut, n.d.), 1:202, no. 2619Google Scholar; idem, Tahdhīb al-tahdhīb (Beirut, 1996), 1:600.Google Scholar

19 Contained in al-Tabarī, al-Muhibb, al-Riyād al-nadira, 1:95–96, 99–100Google Scholar; al-Athīr, Ibn, Usd al-ghāba fi maʿrifat al-sahāba, ed. al-Najafī, Shihāb lal-Dīn (Tehran, n.d.), 1:168Google Scholar; al-Suyūtī, (d. 1505), al-Khasāʾ is al-kubrā aw kifāyat al-tālib al-labīb fi khasāʾ is al-habīb (Cairo, n.d.), 1:29Google Scholar; idem, Taʾrikh al-khulafāʾ (Beirut, 1969), 32.Google Scholar

20 CfUri, Rubin, The Eye of the Beholder: The Life of Muhammad as Viewed by the Early Muslims (Princeton, N.J., 1995), 50–51.Google Scholar

21 al-Tabarī, Al-Muhibb, al-Riyād al-nadira, 3:141.Google Scholar

22 Al-Tabarī, , Taʾrikh al-umam wa-ʾl-mulūk, 1:540Google Scholar; a similar report is recorded by Shayba, Ibn Abī (d. 849) in al-Kitāb al-musannaf fī 'l-ahādith wa-'l-āthār (Beirut, 1989), 6:349, no. 31930.Google Scholar

23 Cfal-Athīr, Ibn, Kāmil, 2:58Google Scholar; Hishām, Ibn, Sira, 1; 167–68Google Scholar; al-Razzāq, ʿAbd, al-Musannaf, ed. al-Aʾzamī, H. R. (Beirut, 1970–1972), 5:325.Google Scholar

24 Hishām, Ibn, Sira, 1:170.Google Scholar

25 This account is contained in al-Tabarī, al-Muhibb, al-Riyād al-nadira, 1:102Google Scholar; for variant reports, see al-Tirmidhi, , Sahih (Cairo, 1934), 13:177Google Scholar, and al-Suyūtī, , Taʾrīkh al-khulafāʾ, 32.Google Scholar

26 Al-Suyūtī, , Taʾrikh al-khulafāʾ, 32.Google Scholar

27 See Madelung, Wilferd, “The Early Murjiʾa in Khurāsān and Transoxiana and the Spread of Hanafism,” in Religious Schools and Sects in Medieval Islam (London, 1985), 32.Google Scholar

28 CfAgha, Saleh Said, “A Viewpoint of the MurjPa in the Umayyad Period: Evolution Through Application,” Journal of Islamic Studies 8 (1997): 36, in which he states that one of the significant tenets of irjāʾ was “a concern for unity [and] aversion to internal strife and blood-letting.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Modarressi, Hossein, Crisis and Consolidation in the Formative Period of Shiʾite Islam (Princeton, N.J., 1993), 213–14Google Scholar, in which he quotes from a refutation by Qiba, Ibn (d. before 931) of the Kitāb al-lshhād by al-ʿAlawī, Abū Zayd (d. late 9th century), a Zaydi scholar.Google Scholar See also al-Bāqillānī, , Kitāb al-Tamhīd fi 'l-radd ʿalā 'l-mulḥida al-muʿaṭṭila wa-'l-rāfiḌa wa-'l-khawārij wa-'l-muʿtazila, ed. Maḥmūd Muhammad al-Khudayrī and Muhammad ʿAbd al-Hādī Abū Rīdah (Cairo, 1947), 169Google Scholar, in which he states that the Bakriyya and the ʿAbbāsiyya were known to believe in naṡṡ for Abu Bakr and al-ʿAbbas, respectively. For the Ibādiyya in general, see van Ess, Josef, Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra (Berlin, 1991), 2:656–59.Google Scholar

30 Al-Masʿūdī, , al-Tanbīh wa-'l-ishrāf, ed. de Goeje, M. J. (Leiden, 1893), 337Google Scholar; Taymiyya, Ibn, Minhāj al-sunna al-nabawiyya fī naqḍ kalām al-shīʿa al-qadariyya, ed. Rashād Sālim, Muḥammad (Cairo, 1962), 1:340–48Google Scholar; Ess, van, Theologie und Gesellschaft, 2:117.Google Scholar For the Bayhasiyya who were the followers of Abū Bayhas al-Haysam ibn Jābir, see al-Ashcʿari, , Maqalat al-islamiyyin (Istanbul, 1928), 107–9Google Scholar, in which he calls them al-Shahrastānī, al-Bayhasīma; (d. 1153), al-Milal wa-'l-nihal (Beirut, 1995), 1:144–47Google Scholar; Ess, van, Theologie und Gesellschaft, 2:594–98.Google Scholar

31 Watt, Montgomery, The Formative Period of Islamic Thought (Edinburgh, 1973), 362, n. 19Google Scholar; Ess, van, Theologie und Gesellschaft, 117.Google Scholar

32 Taymiyya, Ibn, Minhāj al-sunna, 1:341Google Scholar; Ess, van, Theologie und Gesellschaft, 2:117.Google Scholar For the Bakriyya in general, see al-Ashʿari, , Maqālāt al-islāmiyyīn, 273–74Google Scholar; al-Baghdādi, , al-Farq bayn al-firaq, ed. al-Khusht, Muḥammad ʿUthmān (Cairo, n.d.), 187–88Google Scholar; Ess, van, Theologie und Gesellschaft, 2:108–18.Google Scholar

33 Ess, Van, Theologie und Gesellschaft, 2:117–18. In the Maghrib, the Bakriyya were designated as the followers of the Sufi al-Bakri al-Siqilli (d. 996).Google Scholar

34 Al-Ashʿari, , Maqalat al-islamiyyin, 273Google Scholar; al-Baghdādī, , al-Farq, 187.Google Scholar

35 See al-Jāḥiẏ, , “Fʿi '1-hakamayn wa-taswīb amīr al-muʾminīn ʿAlī b. Abī Tālib fī fiʿlihi,” in Rasāʾil al-Jāḥiz, ed. Mulhim, ʿAlī Abū (Beirut, n.d.), 369.Google Scholar

36 Taymiyya, Ibn, Minhāj al-sunna, 1:351.Google Scholar

37 al-Kindi, Muḥammad ibn Yūsuf (d. 870), Wulāt Miṣr (Beirut, 1959), 39, 42, 77Google Scholar; cfMadelung, Wilferd, The Succession to Muhammad (Cambridge, 1997), 152 ff.Google Scholar

38 Al-Masʿūdī, , Murūj al-dhahab wa-maʿadin al-jawhar (Beirut, 1965–1966), 2:353–54.Google Scholar

39 Al-Tabarī, , Taʾrīkh al-umam wa-'l-mulūk, 2:694–95Google Scholar; cfMadelung, , Succession to Muhammad, 146Google Scholar, for a list of the ʿUthmāniyya; for the ʿAlid loyalists, see 141 ff. and references therein.

40 Goldziher, , Muslim Studies, 2:119Google Scholar; cf'I-Hadīd, Ibn Abī, Sharh nahj al-balagha, ed. Tamim, Hasan (Beirut, 1963), 1:804 ff.Google Scholar

41 For the first common definition of the Murjiʾ, see Saʿd, Ibn, Kitāb al-tabaqāt al-kabīr, ed. Sachau, Edward (Leiden, 1904–1908), 6:214Google Scholar; for the second, see al-Shahrastānī, , al-Milal wa-'l-niḥal, 1:162Google Scholar; cfWatt, , Formative Period, 124–26Google Scholar; Athamina, Khalil, “The Early Murjiʾa: Some Notes,” Journal of Semitic Studies 35 (1990): 111–-13.Google Scholar

42 van Ess, Josef, Frühe muʿtazilitische Häresiographie: Zwei Werke des Nāšiʾ al-Akbar, Beiruter Text und Studien, vol. 11 (Beirut, 1971), 60–61.Google Scholar

43 Al-Jāḥiẏ, , Kitāb al-ʿUthmāniyya, ed. Harun, ʿAbad al-Salam (Cairo, 1938), 277.Google Scholar

44 Taymiyya, Ibn, Minhāj al-sunna, 1:340 ff.Google Scholar

45 See also al-Nawbakhti, , Firaq al-shiʿa (Cairo, 1992), 15.Google Scholar

46 Taymiyya, Ibn, Minhāj al-sunna, 1:353; a probable reference to Qurʾan 2:30.Google Scholar

47 Ibid., 1:364–65.

48 For the evolution of this term, see El2, s.v. “Ahl al-Bayt,” 1:237–38; Sharon, Moshe, “Ahl al-Bayt—People of the House,” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 8 (1986): 169–84Google Scholar; see also idem, “The Umayyads as Ahl al-Bayt” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 14 (1991): 116–52, in which he describes Umayyad attempts to arrogate this term to themselves.Google Scholar

49 Their more zealous adherents are called the Rāwandiyya; cfEss, van, Theologie und Gesellschaft, 3:10–17.Google Scholar

50 Al-Fasawī, , Kitāb al-maʿrifa wa-'l-taʾrīkh, ed. al-ʿUmarī, Akram Diyāʾ (Baghdad, 1976), 1:493–542.Google Scholar

51 For whom, see Hajar, Ibn, Tahdhīb al-tahdhīb, 4:92; 1:596.Google Scholar

52 Al-Fasawī, , Maʿrifa, 1:499.Google Scholar

53 Goldziher, , Muslim Studies, 2:107.Google Scholar

54 Al-Munāwī, (d. 1621), Fayd al-qadīr, ed. al-Salam, Ahmad ʿAbd (Beirut, 1994), 1:500 ff.Google Scholar

55 Ibid., 1:513. Significantly, a similar tradition is recorded by al-Khwarazmi, in his Manāqib (p. 219)Google Scholar, in which ʿAli occupies this middle position between Abraham and Muhammad on the Day of Judgment on account of his intimacy with God. In Sunni hadith, the term khalīl in the sense of Muhammad's close friend is overwhelmingly reserved for Abu Bakr; cfal-Bukhārī, , Ṣaḥiḥ (Cairo, 1973), 6:78–79Google Scholar; al-Hajjāj, Muslim ibn, Ṣaḥiḥ (Beirut, 1995), 4:1478–79Google Scholar; Shayba, Ibn Abī, Muṣannaf, 6:348, nos. 31923, 31924, and 31926Google Scholar; Saʿd, Ibn, Tabaqāt, 3:176.Google Scholar

56 Al-Munāwī, , Fayd al-qadīr, 4:491, no. 5665.Google Scholar

57 Ibid., no. 5663.

58 For this hadith in relation to ʿAli, see al-Tirmidhī, (d. 892–93), Ṣaḥiḥ Sunan (Beirut, 1988; hereafter Sunan), 3:213, no. 2929Google Scholar; Māja, Ibn (d. 886), Sunan (Riyadh, 1983), 1:24, no. 106.Google Scholar

59 The family of the Prophet (āl Muhammad), however defined, is barred from accepting both zakāt and ṣadaqa (“voluntary alms”), according to most Sunni jurists; see El2, s.v. “Ṣadaka,” 8:713. The Shiʿa, however, allow ṣadaqa, in addition to khums, for them.

60 Al-Fasawī, , Maʿrifa, 1:536; Muslim, Ṣaḥiḥ, 4:1492–93.Google Scholar For traditions that include the Prophet's wives among the ahl al-bayt, notably Umm Salama, see Shayba, Ibn Abī, Musannaf, 6:370, no. 32104Google Scholar; al-Tabarī, al- Muhibb, Dhakhāʾir al-ʿuqba fi manāqib dhawī 'l-qurbā (Jedda, 1995), 55–59.Google Scholar

6 l For whom, see Sezgin, Fuat, Geschichte des arabischen Schrifttums (Leiden, 1967–1984; hereafter GAS), 1:653 ff.Google Scholar

62 For whom, see al-Baghdādī, al-Khatīb (d. 1071), Taʾrikh Baghdād (Cairo, 1931), 9:174–84; GAS, 1:96.Google Scholar

63 Sunni biographies point out that Jaʿfar ibn Muhammad was also a descendant of Abu Bakr on his mother's side, in which fact he is said to have taken great pride; cf., for example, Hajar, Ibn, Tahdhīb altahdhīb, 1:310–11.Google Scholar

64 See Furat, Ahmed Subhi, “al-Hakīm al-Tirmizī ve al-radd ʿala '1-Rāfiẏa adli risalesi,” in Sarkiyat Mecmuasi 6 (1966): 38Google Scholar; al-Tabarī, al-Muhibb, al-Riyād al-nadira, 1:78.Google Scholar

65 Al-Jāḥiẏ, , ʿUthmāniyya, 113.Google Scholar It should be pointed out that the Risālat al-ʿUthmāniyya has scarcely anything to do with ʿUthman, as Sharon erroneously states in his Black Banners from the East (Jerusalem, 1983), 35 and n. 10.Google Scholar The work is rather exclusively concerned with establishing Abu Bakr's greater qualifications to succeed the Prophet vis-à-vis ʿAli.

66 For accounts referring to Abu Quhafa's acceptance of Islam, see Hishām, Ibn, Sira, 2:856–57.Google Scholar

67 For whom, see Hajar, Ibn, Tahdhīb al-tahdhīb, 4:183–84, in which he is described as a client (mawlā) of Āl al-Zubayr, which immediately attaches to him an anti-ʿAlid bias. The various reports in the Tahdhib, however, pronounce him in general to be a thiqa.Google Scholar

68 See al-Nīsābūrī, Al-Hākim, al-Mustadrak ʿalā 'l-ṣaḥiḥayn (Hyderabad, 1921–1922), 3:475Google Scholar; a similar report, also from Musa ibn ʿUqba, is contained in al-Ṭabarī, al-Muḥibb, al-Riyāḍ al-naḍira, 1:214.Google Scholar For Shiʿi refutation of such traditions, see, for example, al-Amīnī, , Al-ghadīr fi 'l-kitāb wa-'l-sunna wa-'l-adab (Beirut, 1994), 7:351–-66.Google Scholar

69 al-Ṭabarī, Al-Muḥhibb, al-Riyād al-naḍira, 1:224.Google Scholar

70 Ibid., 1:160.

71 For whom, see El2, 1:53–54. ʿAbd Allah Ibn ʿUmar was commonly believed, however, to have belonged to a “neutral” or “moderate” camp that refused to take sides in the dispute between ʿAli and Mucawiya after the murder of cUthman; cfWatt, , Formative Period, 72–73.Google Scholar

72 al-Ṭabarī, Al-Muḥibb, al-Riyad al-nadira, 1:224.Google Scholar Variants of this hadith recorded by al-Suyūtī, in his al- Khaṣāiṣ al-kubrā, 3:239–40Google Scholar, and al-Haythamī, (d. 1566–67) in his Majmaʿal-zawāʾid wa-manbaʿ al-fawāʾid (Beirut, 1967), 9:173, refer to the Prophet's sabab wa-nasab that will not be severed on the Day of Judgment.Google Scholar

73 The ṣalāh tradition in its various versions is recorded, for example, in Saʿd, Ibn, al-Tabaqāt, 3:178, 180Google Scholar; Hishām, Ibn, Sira, 2:1065Google Scholar; al-Fasawi, , Macrifa, 1:446 ff.Google Scholar; al-Razzāq, ʿAbd, Musannaf, 5:433Google Scholar; Hanbal, Ibn, Fadāʾil al-sahāba, ed. ʿAbbās, Waṣiyy Allāh ibn Muhammad (Makka, 1983), 1:157–58, no. 140Google Scholar; al- Balādhurī, , Ansāb al-ashrāf, ed. Allāh, Hamīd (Cairo, n.d.), 1:157–58, no. 1131.Google Scholar

74 See al-Balādhurī, , Ansāb al-ashrāf, 1:554–-55Google Scholar; al-Fasawī, , Maʿrifa, 1:453–54Google Scholar; al-Razzāq, ʿAbd, al- Muṣannaf, 5:432Google Scholar; and al-Barr, Ibn ʿAbd (d. 1070–71), al-Istīʿāb fī maʿrifat al-aṣḥāb, ed. al-Bajawī, Alī Muḥammad (Cairo, n.d.), 3:969–70 for similar and variant accounts. Cf. Islamic Revolution, 15 ff., for Lassner's interpretation of some of these traditions.Google Scholar

75 CfHazm, Ibn, al-Fiṣal fi 'l-milal wa-l-ahwā wa-'l-niḥal (Beirut, 1996), 3:26.Google Scholar

76 Al-Balādhurī, , Ansāb al-ashrāf, 1:560–61.Google Scholar

77 Al-Nawbakhtī, , Firaq al-shīʿa, 15.Google Scholar

78 al-Qummī, Saʿd ibn ʿAbd Allāh, Kitāb al-maqālāt wa-'l-firaq (Tehran, 1963), 7, no. 22.Google Scholar

79 Al-Bukhārī, , Sahih, 7:100–101, no. 3867.Google Scholar

80 Lassner, , Islamic Revolution, 33Google Scholar; cfGoldziher, , Muslim Studies, 2:115.Google Scholar

81 Al-Fasawī, , Maʿrifa, 1:450.Google Scholar

82 For whom, see al-Baghdādi, , Taʾrikh Baghdād, 13:211–16Google Scholar; al-Dhahabī, (d. 1348), al-Mughnīfi 'l-duʿafāʾ, ed. al-Dīn ʿItr, Nūr (n.p., n.d.), 2:540, no. 5164, in which he is described by Ibn Hanbal and al-Nasaʾi as weak while Ibn Zurʿa pronounces him to be a fabricator of traditions (yudallis).Google Scholar

83 Ḥanbal, Ibn, Fadāʾil al-sahāba, 1:194, no. 210.Google Scholar

84 Al-Baghdādī, , Taʾrikh Baghdād, 13:211.Google Scholar

85 Al-Haythamī, , Majmaʿ al-zawāʾid, 9:41.Google Scholaral-Jawzi, Ibn (d. 1201) lists this as a spurious tradition in his Kitāb al-mawdūʿāt, ed. ʿUthman, ʿAbd al-Rahmān Muḥammad (Medina, 1966), 1:318. It is worthy of note that an almost identical tradition occurs in a Zaydi manāqib work, but with ʿAli's name substituted for Abu Bakr's, see Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Sulaymān, Manāqib amīr al-muʾminīn ʿAlī b. Abī Ṭālib, ms., Ambrosiana Microfilm Collection, Medieval Institute, University of Notre Dame, Arabi H 128, pt. 2, fol. 46b. For Abu Jaʿfar (alive 912), see GAS, 1:346.Google Scholar

86 Al-Haythamī, , Majmaʿ al-zawāʾid, 9:41.Google Scholar

87 CfAhmad, Jamal al-DinTawus, Ibn (d. 1274–75), Bināʾ al-maqāla al-fāṭimiyya fi naqḍ al-risāla al-ʿuthmāniyya, ed. al-Ghurayfī, ʿAdnān (Qumm, 1411 A.H.), 242–43.Google Scholar

88 Al-ၬūsi, , al-shāfi, Talkhīṣ, ed. al-Sayyid Husayn Baḥr al-ʿUlūm (Najaf, 1963), 3:30.Google Scholar

89 Ibid.; Raḍī al-DIn Ibn ၬāwūs (d. 1266), Kitāb al-Turaf (Najaf, 1369 A.H.), 31–32.

90 This tradition is recorded, for example, by al-Tirmidhī, Sunan, 3:213, no. 2930, and by Ibn Māja, Sunan, 1:24–25, no. 108.

91 See, for example, al-Bāqillānī, Tamhīd, 169–73.

92 Al-Jāhiz, ʿUthmāniyya, 145. For a variant tradition concerning the Companion Burayda al-Aslami, see ʿAbd al-Razzāq, Musannaf, 11:225, no. 20388; Mustadrak, 3:110.

93 Al-Bukhārī, , Sahīh, 6:79. Abū Dāʾūd, Ṣaḥiḥ Sunan (Beirut, 1989), 3:876, nos. 3870 and 3871.Google Scholar

94 Al-Fasawī, Maʿrifa, 1:479–80.

95 11:225, no. 20387; al-Muḥibb al-Ṭabarī, al-Riyāḍ al-naḍira, 1:47.

96 11:225, no. 20387.

97 Al-Muḥibb al-Ṭabarī, al-Riyāḍ al-naḍira,, 1:65.

98 lbid., 1:62.

99 Ibid., 1:181.

100 al-Jawzī, Abū 'l-Faraj Ibn, Manāqib amīr al-muʾminln ʿUmar b. al-Khaṭṭāb, ed. al-Qārūt, Zaynab Ibrāhim (Beirut, n.d.), 31Google Scholar; al-Suyūtī, , al-Ghurar fi fadāʾil ʿUmar, ed. Haydar, al-Shaykh ʿAmir Ahmad (Beirut, 1991); al-Hākim al-Nīsābūrī, Mustadrak, 3:85.Google Scholar

101 al-Athīr, Ibn, Usd al-ghāba, 3: 216;Google Scholaral-Suyūṭī, , Taʿrikh al-khulafāʿ, 48.Google Scholar

102 Al-Kulaynī, , al-Uṣūl min al-kāfi (Tehran, 1956), 1: 263.Google Scholar

103 Al-Ṭusi, , Ikhtiyār maʿrifat al-rijāl, ed. al-Rajāʾī, al-Sayyid Mahdī (n.p., n.d.), 1:60.Google Scholar

104 Tāj al-Dīn al-Subkī (d. 1355), Ṭabaqāt al-shāfiʾiyya (Cairo, 1914), 1:158.Google Scholar

105 CfWatt, , Formative Period, 167.Google Scholar

106 El 2, s.v. “Imāma,” 3:1164; Zaman, , Religion and Politics, 169 ff.Google Scholar

107 This refers to the treaty of Hudaybiyya, concluded in 628.

108 Al-Baghdādī, , al-Farq, 303–4.Google Scholar

109 For whom, see Ḥajar, Ibn, Tahdhlb al-tahdhib, 4: 252;Google Scholar he is overwhelmingly described as a thiqa from whom the giant traditionists such as al-Bukhari, al-Tirmidhi, al-Nasaʿi, and others, transmitted hadiths.

110 Ibid., 3:1115–16. Cf. the version given by Zaman, , Religion and Politics, 51–52.Google Scholar

111 See further, Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr, IstiḤʿā, 3:1116, in which another report from Yahya ibn Macin states, “The best of this community after our Prophet are Abu Bakr and ʿUmar, then ʿUthman, then ʿAli; this is our doctrine (madhhabunā) and the saying of our leaders.” But according to other reports, Yahya ibn Maʿin also used to place ʿAli before cUthman, apparently with no misgivings.

112 Al-Baghdādī, , al-Farq, 302.Google Scholar

113 Al-Nawbakhtī, , Firaq al-shīʿa, 71;Google Scholarcfal-Qummī, , Maqālāt, 7, no. 25.Google Scholar

114 Al-Bayhaqī, , al-Maḥāsin wa-'l-masāwi (Beirut, 1960), 41.Google Scholar

115 CfManẓūr, Ibn, Lisān al-ʿarab (Beirut, 1993), 5: 266–67;Google ScholarLane, Edward, Arabic-English Lexikon (Cambridge, 1984), 1: 1120.Google Scholar

116 The Zaydi scholar Abu Muhammad al-Qasim al-Rassi (d. 860) wrote several refutations of the Rāfida;cf. GAS, 1:561–63.

117 Qutayba, Ibn, Taʿwil mukhtalif al-ḥadith (Cairo, 1981), 92.Google Scholar

118 See al-Qadi, Wadad, “The Development of the Term Ghulat in Muslim Literature with Special Reference to the Kaysāniyya,” in Akten des VII. Kongresses für Arabistik und Islamwissenschaft, Göttingen, 15. bis. 22. August 1974, ed. Dietrich, Albert (Göttingen, 1976), 310–15, and references therein.Google Scholar

119 See ibn, Abū 'l-ḤasanʿUthmān al-Khayyāṭ, Kitāb al-Intiṣār wa-'l-radd ʿalā Ibn al-Rāwandī al-mulḥid mā qaṣada bihi min al-kidhb ʿalā 'l-muslimīn wa-'l-ṭaʿn ʿalayhim (Beirut, 1957), 117.Google Scholar

120 Al-Nawbakhtī, , Firaq al-shiʿa, 15;Google Scholaral-Qummī, , Maqālāt, 3, no. 5.Google Scholar

121 Al-Masʿūdī, , al-Tanbīh wa-'l-ishrāf, 337.Google Scholar

122 Al-Ṭüsi, , Talkhīṣ, 2:94, 99.Google Scholar

123 Ṭāwūs, Aḥmad Ibn, Bināʾ al-maqāla, 116.Google Scholar

124 Al-Ṭūsī, , Talkh¯ṣ, 2: 96 ff.Google Scholar

125 CfWatt, , Formative Period, 81;Google ScholarEss, van, Theologie und Gesellschaft, 2: 117.Google ScholarThe entry on al-Hasan in ʿAbd al-Jabbār's Ṭabaqāt al-muʿtazila (Tunis, 1393/1974), 215–25,Google Scholar which otherwise gives a detailed account of his thought, makes no reference to his belief in naṣṣ.

126 Al-Ṭūsī, , Talkhīṣ, 2: 94–95,Google Scholar and Ess, van, Theologie und Gesellschaft, 1: 379,Google Scholar in which it is mentioned that the theory of naṣṣ is also attributed to Hisham ibn al-Hakam (d. 3rd/9th century); ʿal-Jabbār, Abd, Tathbīt dalāʿil al-nubuwwa, ed. ʿʿUthmān, Abd al-Karīm (Beirut, 1996), 224–26.Google Scholar Other accounts attribute it to Abu ʿIsa al-Warraq (d. 861); al-Ṭūsī, , Talkhīṣ, 2: 95.Google Scholar For Ibn al-Rawandi, see El 2, 3:905–6.

127 Zaman, , Religion and Politics, 8 ff.Google Scholar

128 CfCrone, Patricia and Hinds, Martin, God's Caliph: Religious Authority in the First Centuries of Islam (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar

129 Madelung, , Succession to Muḥammad, Introduction, 1–27.Google Scholar

130 'l-Hadīd, Ibn Abī, Sharḥ nahj al-balāgha, Beirut, ed., 2:267.Google Scholar