Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:44:26.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making “Tribes” in the Late Ottoman Empire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2021

Nora Elizabeth Barakat
Nora Elizabeth Barakat*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Stanford University, Stanford, CAUSA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Oymak. Al. Boy. Cemaat. Taife. Aşiret. These are the terms Ottoman officials used in imperial orders (mühimme) to describe diverse human communities linked by their mobility and externality to village administration in Ottoman Anatolia between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries. In 1924, Turkish historian Ahmet Refik compiled Ottoman imperial orders concerning such communities into a volume he titled Anadolu'da Türk Aşiretleri, 966–1200 (Turkish Tribes in Anatolia, 1560–1786). His use of the term aşiret (tribe) in the title is striking, because this term was only used in 9% of the orders in his volume (23 out of 244 total). However, by the late nineteenth century and in Refik's early Republican context, aşiret had become the standard term for these rural, extra-village, mobile human communities, which he understood as similar enough to include in his painstaking effort of compilation.

Type
Roundtable
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , August 2021 , pp. 482 - 487
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Refik, Ahmet, Anadolu'da Türk Âşiretleri, 966–1200: Anadolu'da Yaşayan Türk Aşiretleri Hakkında Divani Hümayun Mühmime Defterlerinde Mukayyet Hükümleri Havidir (Istanbul: Devlet Matbaası, 1930)Google Scholar.

2 Zakariya, Wasfi, ʻAsha'ir al-Sham (Damascus: Dar al-Fikr, 1983)Google Scholar; ʻAbbas Azzawi, ʻAsha'ir al-ʻIraq (Baghdad: Mabba'at al-Ma`arif, 1947); Other examples of mid-twentieth-century compilations include ʻUmar Rida Kahhala, Muʻjam Qaba'il al-ʻArab al-Qadima wa-l-Haditha, 5 vols. (Beirut: Mu'assasat al-Risala, 1982); and Baha Tuqan's translated and expanded edition of Frederick Peake's A History of Jordan and its Tribes, Baha al-Din Tuqan, trans., Tarikh Sharq al-Urdunn wa-Qaba'iliha (Amman: al-Dar al-‘Arabiyya, 1935).

3 Shryock, Andrew, Nationalism and the Genealogical Imagination: Oral History and Textual Authority in Tribal Jordan (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997), 221–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 See for example a map of the winter grazing grounds of aşirets in Iraq and Najd created by the Ottoman Sixth Army in 1909/1910, with an accompanying table listing population, dwelling type, sect, and weapons holdings of each aşiret, held at the Rare Sources Library at Istanbul University (Harita # 93667). I thank Camille Cole for bringing this source to my attention, and the Historical Texts Analysis team of the OpenGulf project for our discussions of its implications for late Ottoman conceptions of “tribe”: David Joseph Wrisley, Camille Cole, and Nada Ammagui. See also, Camille Lyons Cole, “Empire on Edge: Land, Law and Capital in Gilded Age Basra” (PhD dissertation, Yale University, 2020), 199–205.

5 Kasaba, Reşat, A Moveable Empire: Ottoman Nomads, Migrants and Refugees (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

6 Sneath, David, The Headless State: Aristocratic Orders, Kinship Society, and Misrepresentations of Nomadic Inner Asia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tapper, Richard, “Anthropologists, Historians and Tribespeople on Tribe and State Formation in the Middle East,” in Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East, ed. Kostiner, Joseph and Khoury, Philip (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1990), 48–73Google Scholar.

7 Winter, Stefan, “The Province of Raqqa Under Ottoman Rule, 1535–1800: A Preliminary Study,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 68, no. 4 (2009): 253–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stefan Winter, “Alep et l’émirat Du Désert (Çöl Beyliği) Au Xviie-Xviiie Siècle,” in Aleppo and Its Hinterland in the Ottoman Period/Alep et Sa Province à l’époque Ottomane, ed. Stefan Winter and Mafalda Ade (Leiden: Brill, 2019), 86–108; Orhonlu, Cengiz, Osmanli İmparatorluğu'nda Aşiretlerin İskanı (Istanbul: Eren, 1987)Google Scholar; Halaçoğlu, Yusuf, 18. Yüzyılda Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nun İskan Siyaseti ve Aşiretlerin Yerleştirilmesi (Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1991)Google Scholar.

8 Yaycıoğlu, Ali, Partners of the Empire: The Crisis of the Ottoman Order in the Age of Revolutions (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar; Hill, Peter, “How Global Was the Age of Revolutions? The Case of Mount Lebanon, 1821,” Journal of Global History 16, no. 1 (2021): 65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fahmy, Khaled, All the Pasha's Men: Mehmed Ali, His Army and the Making of Modern Egypt (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

9 This vision is articulated comprehensively in the Provincial Administration Regulation (Vilayet Nizamnamesi). Düstur: I. Tertib, vol. 1 (Istanbul: Matbaa-yi Amire, 1289), 625; For the concept of state space, see Lefebvre, Henri, State, Space, World: Selected Essays, ed. Brenner, Neil and Elden, Stuart (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

10 Kasaba, A Moveable Empire, Chapter 4; For efforts in Iraq, see Ceylan, Ebubekir, The Ottoman Origins of Modern Iraq: Political Reform, Modernization and Development in the Nineteenth Century Middle East (London: I. B. Tauris, 2011), 134–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (hereafter B.O.A.) I.MSM 69/2005, 8 Z 1260/19 December 1844, Page 2.

12 Köksal, Yonca, “Coercion and Mediation: Centralization and Sedentarization of Tribes in the Ottoman Empire,” Middle Eastern Studies 42, no. 3 (2006): 469–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Kasaba, A Moveable Empire; Andrew Gould, “Pashas and Brigands: Ottoman Provincial Reform and Its Impact on the Nomadic Tribes of Southern Anatolia, 1840–1885” (PhD Dissertation, Los Angeles, University of California, Los Angeles, 1973); Toksöz, Meltem, Nomads, Migrants and Cotton in the Eastern Mediterranean: The Making of the Adana-Mersin Region 1850–1908 (Leiden: Brill, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Paşa, Midhat, Hayatım İbret Olsun, vol. 1 (Istanbul: Hilal, 1908)Google Scholar; Ceylan, The Ottoman Origins of Modern Iraq; Gratien, Chris, “The Ottoman Quagmire: Malaria, Swamps, and Settlement in the Late Ottoman Mediterranean,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 49, no. 4 (2017): 583–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 BOA.ŞD 2272/27 31 Mart 1295/April 12 1879

16 Fethi Gedikli, “Midhat Paşa'nın Suriye Layihası,” Divan, no. 2 (1999): 169–89.

17 References to the mukhtārs of these communities are scattered in the Salt sharia court records (SSCR). For example, see Muhammad ʻAbd al-Qadir Khuraysat and Farid Tarif Dawud, Jurj, Sijill Mahkamat al-Salt al-Shar‘iyya: 5 Dhi al-Qa'da 1302 H-Ghurrat Rabi` al-Thani 1305 H, 1885–1888 M (Amman: Ministry of Culture, 2007)Google Scholar.

18 See the Title Regulation (Tapu Nizamnamesi), Düstur, 1289, 1:200–8.

19 SSCR Volume 5, Page 122, Record 124, n.d.

20 SSCR Volume 18, page 159, 25 R 1330/13 April 1912.

21 See for example the 1867 Regulation on Financial Affairs (Umur-u maliye dair nizamname) Düstur: I. Tertib, vol. 2 (Istanbul: Matbaa-yi Amire, 1289), 4.

22 Batatu, Hanna, The Old Social Classes & The Revolutionary Movement In Iraq (London: Saqi Books, 2004)Google Scholar; Haj, Samira, “The Problems of Tribalism: The Case of Nineteenth-Century Iraqi History,” Social History 16, no. 1 (1991): 45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Rogan, Eugene, Frontiers of the State in the Late Ottoman Empire: Transjordan, 1850–1921 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

24 Fratantuono, Ella, “Producing Ottomans: Internal Colonization and Social Engineering in Ottoman Immigrant Settlement,” Journal of Genocide Research 21, no. 1 (2019): 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 For the Ottoman projection that the southeastern interior could support 50,000 settlers, see BOA.DH.MKT 217/23, 13 February 1894. For the eventual outcome, see Hamed-Troyansky, Vladimir, “Circassian Refugees and the Making of Amman, 1878–1914,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 49, no. 4 (2017): 607CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Nora Barakat, “Marginal Actors? The Role of Bedouin in the Ottoman Administration of Animals as Property in the District of Salt, 1870–1912,” Journal of the Economic & Social History of the Orient 58, no. 1/2 (2015): 115. The text of the law is at BOA.DH.ID 104-2, p. 49, 18 Ca 1331/25 April 1913.

27 Alon, Yoav, The Shaykh of Shaykhs: Mithqal al-Fayiz and Tribal Leadership in Modern Jordan (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Nora Elizabeth Barakat, “An Empty Land? Nomads and Property Administration in Hamidian Syria” (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 2015), 105–9.

29 Massad, Joseph, Colonial Effects: The Making of National Identity in Jordan (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Neep, Daniel, Occupying Syria under the French Mandate: Insurgency, Space and State Formation (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Zakariya, ʻAsha'ir al-Sham, 6.

31 Chatty, Dawn, “The Bedouin in Contemporary Syria: The Persistence of Tribal Authority and Control,” Middle East Journal 64, no. 1 (2010): 29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Das, Veena and Poole, Deborah, “State and Its Margins: Comparative Ethnographies,” in Anthropology in the Margins of the State (Oxford, UK: James Currey, 2004), 7Google Scholar.