Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:25:21.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pareto optimization of radar receiver low-noise amplifier source impedance for low noise and high gain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

Charles Baylis ,
Robert J. Marks II  and
Lawrence Cohen
Charles Baylis
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA
Robert J. Marks II*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA
Lawrence Cohen
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, DC, District of Columbia, USA
*
Corresponding author: R.J. Marks Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In radar receivers, the low noise amplifier (LNA) must provide very low noise figure and high gain to successfully receive very low signals reflected off of illuminated targets. Obtaining low noise figure and high gain, unfortunately, is a well-known trade-off that has been carefully negotiated by design engineers for years. This paper presents a fundamental solution method for the source reflection coefficient providing the maximum available gain under a given noise figure constraint, and also for the lowest possible noise figure under a gain constraint. The design approach is based solely on the small-signal S-parameters and noise parameters of the device; no additional measurements or information are required. This method is demonstrated through examples. The results are expected to find application in design of LNAs and in real-time reconfigurable amplifiers for microwave communication and radar receivers.

Keywords

AmplifiersCircuit designCircuit theoryLow noise amplifiersMicrowave circuitsOptimization
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 8 , Issue 8 , December 2016 , pp. 1133 - 1139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Eye, R.; Allen, D.: 77 GHz low noise amplifier for automotive radar applications, in 25th Gallium Arsenide Integrated Circuit (GaAs IC) Symp. Technical Digest, November 2003, 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Hartmann, M.; Wagner, C.; Seemann, K.; Platz, J.; Weigel, R.: A low-power low-noise single-chip receiver front-end for automotive radar at 77 GHz in silicon-germanium bipolar technology, in 2007 Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symp., Honolulu, Hawaii, June 2007, 149–152.Google Scholar
[3] Kuo, W.-M.L.; Liang, Q.; Cressler, J.D.; Mitchell, M.A.: An X-Band SiGe LNA with 1.36 dB mean noise figure for monolithic phased array transmit/receive radar modules, in 2006 Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symp., San Francisco, California, June 2006.Google Scholar
[4] Kuo, W.-M.L. et al. : A low-power, X-Band SiGe HBT low-noise amplifier for near-space applications. IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., 16 (9) (2006), 520–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Dawood, M.; Narayanan, R.M.: Receiver operating characteristics for the coherent UWB random noise radar. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 37 (2) (2001), 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Fukui, H.: Available power gain, noise figure, and noise measure of two-ports and their graphical representation. IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory, CT-13 (2) (1966), 137–142.Google Scholar
[7] Nieuwoldt, A.; Ragheb, T.; Massoud, Y.: SOC-LNA: synthesis and optimization for fully integrated narrow-band CMOS low-noise amplifiers, in Proc. of the 43rd Annual Design Automation Conf., 2006, 879–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Nieuwoudt, A.; Ragheb, T.; Massoud, Y.: Hierarchical optimization methodology for wideband low noise amplifiers, in Proc. of the 2007 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conf., 2007, 68–73.Google Scholar
[9] Nguyen, T.-K.; Kim, C.-H.; Ihm, G.-J.; Yang, M.-S.; Lee, S.-G.: CMOS low-noise amplifier design optimization techniques. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 52 (5) (2004), 1433–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Fukui, H.: The noise performance of microwave transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 13 (3) (1966), 329–341.Google Scholar
[11] Fukui, H. et al. : Optimization of low-noise GaAs MESFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 27 (6) (1980), 1034–1037.Google Scholar
[12] Hashemi, H.; Hajimiri, A.: Concurrent multiband low-noise amplifiers – theory, design, and applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 50 (1) (2002), 288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Niu, G.; Cressler, J.D.; Zhang, S.; Joseph, A.; Harame, D.: Noise-gain tradeoff in RF SiGe HBTs. Solid State Electron., Elsevier Press, 49 (9) (2002), 1445–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Gonzalez, G.: Microwave Transistor Amplifiers:Analysis and Design, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1997.Google Scholar
[15] Miettinen, K.: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Baylis, C. et al. : Designing transmitters for spectral conformity: power amplifier design issues and strategies. IET Radar Sonar Nav., 5 (6) (2011), 681–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Ubostad, M.; Olavsbraten, M.: Linearity performance of an RF power amplifier under different bias and load conditions with and without DPD, in 2010 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symp. Digest, 232–235.Google Scholar
[18] Martin, J.; Baylis, C.; Cohen, L.; de Graaf, J.; Marks, R.J. II: A peak-search algorithm for load-pull optimization of power-added efficiency and adjacent-channel power ratio. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 62 (8) (2014), 1772–1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Fellows, M.; Baylis, C.; Martin, J.; Cohen, L.; Marks, R.J. II: Direct algorithm for the Pareto load-pull optimization of power-added efficiency and adjacent-channel power ratio. IET Radar Sonar Nav., 8 (9) (2014), 1280–1287.Google Scholar