Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:49:17.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Near-field to far-field transformation applied to UHF antennas over lossy ground

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

Nicolas Bourey
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Électronique et Électromagnétisme, Sorbonne Université, L2E, F-75005, Paris, France
Muriel Darces*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Électronique et Électromagnétisme, Sorbonne Université, L2E, F-75005, Paris, France
Yves Chatelon
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Électronique et Électromagnétisme, Sorbonne Université, L2E, F-75005, Paris, France
Marc Hélier
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Électronique et Électromagnétisme, Sorbonne Université, L2E, F-75005, Paris, France
*
Author for correspondence: Muriel Darces, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper deals with a near-field to far-field transformation able to predict the radiation of UHF antennas located over a lossy ground. From in-situ near-field measurements, an equivalent set of dipole sources is obtained as a model of the characterized antenna. The paper details the main steps of the transformation and describes the specific experimental set-up designed for the application. Simple directional antennas (monopoles array) as well as more complex omnidirectional antennas (like a biconical antenna as a scaled-down model of a HF antenna) have been tested in realistic environments. This approach is very efficient for separating the contributions of the radiated waves: the sky wave and the surface wave.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Yaghjian, A (1986) An overview of near-field antenna measurements. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 34, 3045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Schmidt, CH, Leibfritz, MM and Eibert, TF (2008) Fully probe-corrected near-field far-field transformation employing plane wave expansion and diagonal translation operators. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 56, 737746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Sarkar, TK and Taagho, A (1999) Near-field to near/far-field transformation for arbitrary near-field geometry utilizing an equivalent electric current and MoM. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 47, 566573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Alvarez, Y, Las-Heras, F and Pino, MR (2007) Reconstruction of equivalent currents distribution over arbitrary three-dimensional surfaces based on integral equation algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 55, 34603468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Sugimoro, Y and Arai, H (2017) Far-field estimation of antennas above the earth using hemispherical source reconstruction. International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP), Phukhet, Thailand.Google Scholar
6Saccardi, F, Mioc, F, Giacomini, A, and Foged, LJ (2018) Estimation of the realistic ground effect in free-space automotive measurements. 2018 AMTA Proceedings, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 15.Google Scholar
7Schmidt, CH and Eibert, TF (2009) Multilevel plane wave based near-field far-field transformation for electrically large antennas in free-space or above material halfspace. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 57, 13821390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Norton, KA (1937) The physical reality of space and surface waves in the radiation field of radio antennas. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 25, 11921236.Google Scholar
9Bannister, P (1967) The quasi-near fields of dipole antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 15, 618626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Payet, N, Darces, M, Montmagnon, JL, Hélier, M and Jangal, F (2012) Near field to far field transformation by using equivalent sources in HF band. 15. International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
11Djoma, C, Darces, M and Hélier, M (2015) Prediction of sky and surface wave radiation of a wideband HF antenna. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 34, 11491152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Bourey, N, Darces, M and Hélier, M (2018) In situ antenna far field estimation based on equivalent sources. Proc. APS/URSI Conf., Boston, USA.Google Scholar
13E-Field Probe System EFS-105: http://www.enprobe.de/, Accessed: 2019-04-01.Google Scholar
14Belhadj-Tahar, NE, Meyer, O and Fourier-Lamer, A (1997) Broad-band microwave characterization of bilayered materials using a coaxial discontinuity with applications for thin conductive films for microelectronics and material in air-tight cell. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 45, 260267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar