Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:01:12.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Miniature directive antennas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2014

M. Pigeon ,
C. Delaveaud ,
L. Rudant  and
K. Belmkaddem
M. Pigeon
Affiliation:
CEA-LETI, Minatec Campus, 17 rue des martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France. Phone: + 33 438783591
C. Delaveaud*
Affiliation:
CEA-LETI, Minatec Campus, 17 rue des martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France. Phone: + 33 438783591
L. Rudant
Affiliation:
CEA-LETI, Minatec Campus, 17 rue des martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France. Phone: + 33 438783591
K. Belmkaddem
Affiliation:
CEA-LETI, Minatec Campus, 17 rue des martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France. Phone: + 33 438783591
*
Corresponding author: C. Delaveaud Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the work carried out to assess the feasibility of miniature directive antennas. It is based on an analysis of the physical limits of antenna directivity in general and in particular as a function of their compact dimensions. A state of the art is done to identify and classify techniques to increase the directivity of compact antennas.

Keywords

DirectivityMiniature antennasAntenna arraysHigh impedance surface (HIS)Loaded antennasHuygens sourcesReflector
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 6 , Issue 1: IJMWT Special Issue on the 2013 National Microwave Days in France , February 2014 , pp. 45 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Wheeler, H.A.: Fundamentals limitations of small antennas. Proc. IRE, 35, (1947), 1479–1484.Google Scholar
[2]Chu, L.J.: Physical limitations on omni-directional antennas. Proc. IRE, 19, (1948), 1163–1175.Google Scholar
[3]Harrington, R.F.: On the gain and beamwidth of directional antennas. IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., 6 (1958), 219–225.Google Scholar
[4]Harrington, R.F.: Effect of antenna size on gain, bandwidth and efficiency. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., 64-D (1960), 1–12.Google Scholar
[5]McLean, J.S.: A re-examination of the fundamental limits on the radiation Q of electrically small antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 44 (5) (1996), 672–676.Google Scholar
[6]Taylor, T.T.: A discussion of the maximum directivity of an antenna. Proc. IRE, 36 (1948), 1135.Google Scholar
[7]Riblet, H.J.: Note on the maximum directivity of an antenna. Proc. IRE, 36 (1948), 620–624.Google Scholar
[8]Hansen, R.C.: Fundamental limitations in antennas. Proc. IEEE, 69, (2), (1981), 170–182.Google Scholar
[9]Oseen, C.W.: Die Einsteinsche Nadelstichstrahlung und die Maxwellschen Gleighungen. Ann. Phys., 69 (1922), 202.Google Scholar
[10]Uzkov, A.I.: An approach to the problem of optimum directive antennae design. Comptes rendus (Doklady) de l'académie des Sciences de l'URSS, 53 (1) (1946), 35–38.Google Scholar
[11]Geyi, W.: Physical limitations of antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 51 (2003), 2116–2123.Google Scholar
[12]Pozar, D.M.: New results for minimum Q, maximum gain, and polarization properties of electrically small arbitrary antennas, in Eur. Conf. Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2009, 1993–1996.Google Scholar
[13]Belmkaddem, K., Rudant, L., Vuong, T.P.: Small antenna radiation properties analysis using spherical wave expansion, in Int. Symp. 15th Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM), 2012, 1–15.Google Scholar
[14]Belmkaddem, K., Rudant, L., Vuong, T.P.: Investigation on antenna's miniaturization using spherical wave expansion, in Proc. Seventh Eur. Conf. Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), April 2013, 1887–1890.Google Scholar
[15]Grange, F.: Matériaux composites pour antenne miniature intégrée. PhD thesis, Rennes 1 University, November 2010.Google Scholar
[16]Souny, B., ENAC: Antenne Autodirective en Polarisation Circulaire. FR2949611, 2010.Google Scholar
[17]Hadik-Barkoczy, E.B.; Textron: end-loaded filament antenna. US3605097, 1971.Google Scholar
[18]Voronoff, G.N.: Electrically small, double loop low backlobe antenna. US3984838, 1976.Google Scholar
[19]Pfeiffer, C., Grbic, A., Xu, X., Forrest, S.R.: Novel methods to analyze and fabricate electrically small antennas, in 2011 IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), 2011, 761–764.Google Scholar
[20]Kim, O.S., Pivnenko, S., Breinbjerg, O.: Superdirective magnetic dipole array as first-order probe for spherical near field antenna measurements. IEEE Trans. Antenna Propag., 10 (2012), 4670–4676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Luukkonen, O., Karilainen, A.O., Vehmas, J., Simovski, C., Tretyakov, S.A.: A high-impedance surface based antenna – lose the antenna, in Proc. Fourth Eur. Conf. Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), April 2010, 1–5.Google Scholar
[22]Jin, P., Ziolkowski, R.W.: High-directivity, electrically small, low-profile near-field resonant parasitic antennas. IEEE Antenna Wirel. Propag. Lett., 11 (2012), 305–309.Google Scholar
[23]Yaghjian, A.D.: Increasing the supergain of electrically small antennas using metamaterials, in Proc. Third Eur. Conf. Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), April 2009, 858–860.Google Scholar
[24]Jin, P., Ziolkowski, R.W.: Metamaterial – inspired, electrically small Huygens sources, IEEE Antenna Wirel. Propag. Lett., 9 (2010), 501–505.Google Scholar
[25]Best, S.R.: Progress in the design and realization of an electrically small Huygens source, in 2010 IEEE Int. Workshop on Antenna Technology (iWAT), 2010, 1–4.Google Scholar
[26]Alitalo, P., Karilainen, A.O., Niemi, T., Simovski, C.R., Tretyakov, S.A.: A linearly polarized Huygens source formed by two omega particles, in Proc. Fifth Eur. Conf. Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2011, 2302–2305.Google Scholar
[27]Schantz, H.G.: Directive, electrically-small UWB antennas, in 2012 IEEE Int. Conf. Ultra-wideband (ICUWB), 2012, 227–231.Google Scholar
[28]Weber, J., Volmer, C., Blau, K., Stephan, R., Hein, M.A.: Miniaturized antenna arrays with an element separation down to λ/10, in 2007 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Int. Symp., IEEE, 2007, 5897–5900.Google Scholar
[29]O'Donnell, T.H., Yaghjian, A.D.: Electrically small superdirective arrays using parasitic elements, in IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas and Propagation Society, 2006, 3111–3114.Google Scholar
[30]Yaghjian, A.D., O'Donnel, T.h., Altshuler, E.A., Best, S.R.: Electrically small supergain endfire arrays. Radio Sci., 43 (3) (2008), 1–13.Google Scholar
[31]Engheta, N., Ziolkowski, R.W.: Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations, Wiley-IEEE Press, October 2006, ISBN: 978-0-471-78418-0.Google Scholar
[32]Clavin, A., Huebner, D.A., Kilburg, F.J.: An improved element for use in array antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., ap-22 (4) (1974), 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33]Beverage, H.H.: Radioreceiving system. US Patent 1 381 089, April 1920.Google Scholar