Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:38:56.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved IP2 calibration method using a perturbance-based algorithm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2009

Karim Aoulad Ali ,
Philippe Barré ,
Guillaume Andrieux  and
Jean-François Diouris
Karim Aoulad Ali*
Affiliation:
ST-NXP Wireless, 2 esplanade Anton Philips, Campus Effiscience, Colombelles, BP 20000, 14906 Caen Cedex 9, France. Phone: +33(0)2.31.45.6000; Fax: 3970, Emails: [email protected], [email protected] Research Institute in Electrotechniques and Electronics of Nantes Atlantique (IREENA), University of Nantes, Rue Christian Pauc, La Chantrerie, BP 50609, 44306 Nantes Cedex 3, France. Phone: +33(0)2.40.68.3074; Fax: 3233, Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].
Philippe Barré
Affiliation:
ST-NXP Wireless, 2 esplanade Anton Philips, Campus Effiscience, Colombelles, BP 20000, 14906 Caen Cedex 9, France. Phone: +33(0)2.31.45.6000; Fax: 3970, Emails: [email protected], [email protected]
Guillaume Andrieux
Affiliation:
Research Institute in Electrotechniques and Electronics of Nantes Atlantique (IREENA), University of Nantes, Rue Christian Pauc, La Chantrerie, BP 50609, 44306 Nantes Cedex 3, France. Phone: +33(0)2.40.68.3074; Fax: 3233, Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].
Jean-François Diouris
Affiliation:
Research Institute in Electrotechniques and Electronics of Nantes Atlantique (IREENA), University of Nantes, Rue Christian Pauc, La Chantrerie, BP 50609, 44306 Nantes Cedex 3, France. Phone: +33(0)2.40.68.3074; Fax: 3233, Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected].
*
Corresponding author: K.A. Ali Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To achieve a high IIP2 level on a mixer, static calibration techniques have been developed. Most of them are based on an intentional introduction of a calibrated mismatch in the structure of the mixer. They are performed at production stage. It is also possible to automate them but their activation is strongly limited in portable devices because of system restrictions. Furthermore, IIP2 is sensitive to system variations, thereby degrading the calibration operation. The challenge is so to make the calibration system dynamic, i.e. performing an online calibration. This paper presents a perturbance-based algorithm as part of an automatic calibration system to track the optimum IIP2 level. Measurements validate the algorithm behavior and indicate the feasibility of using it in a complete calibration system for a future on-chip implementation.

Keywords

CalibrationDirect conversion receiversDownconversion mixerIIP2Perturbance-based algorithmSecond-order distortion
Type
Original Article
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 83 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Razavi, B.: Design considerations for direct-conversion receivers. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 44 (June 1997), 428–435.Google Scholar
[2]Chen, H.; Huang, P.; Wen, C.; Chen, J.: Adaptive compensation of even-order distortion in direct conversion receivers, in Proc. Vehicular Technology Conf., 6–9 October 2003, 271–274.Google Scholar
[3]Valkama, M.; Ghadam, A.S.H.; Anttila, L.; Renfors, M.: Advanced signal processing techniques for compensation of nonlinear distortion in wideband multicarrier radio receivers. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 54(6) (June 2006), 2356–2366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Kivekas, K.; Parssinen, A.; Ryynanen, J.; Jussila, J.; Halonen, K.: Calibration techniques of active BiCMOS mixers. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 37(6) (June 2002), 766–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Barré, P.; Ozenne, P.: Implementation of an IIP2 automatic calibration technique. International Patent 006146WO1, (27 June 2006).Google Scholar
[6]Darabi, H., Kim, H.J., Chiu, J., Ibrahim, B., Serano, L.: An IIP2 improvement technique for zero-IF down-converter, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuit Conference, 6–9 February 2006, 464–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Dufrêne, K., Boos, Z., Weigel, R.: A 0.13 µm 1.5 V CMOS I/Q downconverter with digital adaptive IIP2 calibration, in IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conf., 2007, 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Manstretta, D.; Brandolini, M.; Svelto, F.: Second-order intermodulation mechanisms in CMOS downconverters. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 38(3) (March 2003), 394–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kivekas, K.; Parssinen, A.; Halonen, K.A.I.: Characterization of IIP2 and DC-offsets in transconductance mixers. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 48(11) (November 2001), 1028–1038.Google Scholar
[10]3rd Generation Partnership Project: Technical Specification GRAN, User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception (FDD). TS 25.101, V6.7.0 (Release 6), March 2005.Google Scholar
[11]Charlon, O. et al. : A dual-mode zero-IF receiver for dual-band CDMA cellular and GPS, in IEEE European Solid-State Circuits Conf., 11–13 September 2007, 432–435.Google Scholar