Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-wjqwx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T06:58:29.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction of the orthogonal mode via the polarization conversion parasitic structure for the isolation enhancement of MIMO patch antennas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2024

Zhonghong Du ,
Xiaohui Zhang ,
Peiyu Qin ,
Yurong Pu  and
Xiaoli Xi Open the ORCID record for Xiaoli Xi [Opens in a new window]
Zhonghong Du
Affiliation:
The Faculty of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China
Xiaohui Zhang*
Affiliation:
The Faculty of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China
Peiyu Qin
Affiliation:
The Faculty of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Brunel University London, London, UK
Yurong Pu
Affiliation:
The Faculty of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China
Xiaoli Xi
Affiliation:
The Faculty of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China
*
Corresponding author: Xiaohui Zhang; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, a high-isolation multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) microstrip patch antenna (MPA), which utilizes an orthogonal mode cancellation method is proposed. This method employs TM10 and TM01 modes, which are simultaneously excited in the rectangular passive MPA. Initially, a rectangular decoupling structure featuring polarization rotation characteristics is designed. Further studies show that by loading the polarization conversion parasitic structure (PCPS), the electric field of the spatial coupling wave can be transformed from the x-polarized TM10 mode to the y-polarized TM01 mode. Therefore, TM10 and TM01 modes from the excited antenna and decoupling structure are concurrently coupled to the passive antenna, forming an evident weak-field region on the passive antenna. Placing the feeding probe of the passive MPA within the weak-field region prevents signal reception at the port. Consequently, this results in an extremely low mutual coupling of −49 dB at a resonant frequency of 5.8 GHz. Finally, a prototype of the proposed antenna is fabricated and tested, and the measured results closely match the simulated results. Additionally, it is observed that PCPS slightly influences the performance of the MIMO antenna.

Keywords

isolation enhancementMIMO antennapolarization conversionweak-field region construction
Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 16 , Special Issue 5: EuMW 2022 Special Issue , June 2024 , pp. 893 - 901
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The European Microwave Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Xu, H, Liang, Z and Li, Y (2022) A high-gain microstrip magnetic dipole antenna utilizing slot-loaded high-order mode for WLAN applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 70, 9130–9138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, C, Li, J and Yang, D (2022) Compact co-polarized decoupled microstrip patch array antenna based on TM02/TM03 modes cancellation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 70, 9906–9911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, A, Liu, Y and Sim, C (2019) A compact building block with two shared-aperture antennas for eight-antenna MIMO array in metal-rimmed smartphone. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 67, 6430–6438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A and Imaculate Rosaline, S (2021) Hybrid half-mode SIW cavity-backed diplex antenna for on-body transceiver applications. Applied Physics A 127, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A, Chaturvedi, D and Raghavan, S (2019) Dual-band, dual-fed self-diplexing antenna. In 2019 13th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 1–5.Google Scholar
Ren, A, Yu, H and Yang, L (2023) A broadband MIMO antenna based on multimodes for 5G smartphone applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 22, 1642–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W, Li, Y and Wei, K (2023) A dual-band MIMO antenna system for 2.4/5 GHz WLAN applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 71, 5749–5758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, K, Chen, J and Li, W (2021) Integrated four low-profile shorted patch dual-band WLAN MIMO antennas for mobile device applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 69, 3566–3571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, D, Cao, Z and Fu, S (2020) A novel slot-array defected ground structure for decoupling microstrip antenna array. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 68, 7027–7038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, B, Chen, X and Kishk, A (2021) Decoupling of microstrip antennas with defected ground structure using the common/differential mode theory. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 20, 828–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, X, Wang, W and Wu, Y (2019) Enhancing isolation in dual-band meander-line multiple antenna by employing split EBG structure. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 67, 2769–2774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luan, H, Chen, C and Chen, W (2019) Mutual coupling reduction of closely E/H-plane coupled antennas through metasurfaces. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 18, 1996–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafargholi, A, Jafargholi, A and Choi, J (2018) Mutual coupling reduction in an array of patch antennas using CLL metamaterial superstrate for MIMO applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 67, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, R, An, H and Zheng, H (2020) Neutralization line decoupling tri-band multiple-input multiple-output antenna design. IEEE Access 8, .Google Scholar
Li, M, Wang, M and Jiang, L (2021) Decoupling of antennas with adjacent frequency bands using cascaded decoupling network. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 69, 1173–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M, Zhang, D and Wu, K (2022) Decoupling and matching network for dual-band MIMO antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 70, 1764–1775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Y, Ding, X and Shao, W (2017) Reduction of mutual coupling between patch antennas using a polarization-conversion isolator. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 1257–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, K, Li, J and Wang, L (2017) Microstrip antenna array mutual coupling suppression using coupled polarisation transformer. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 11, 1836–1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odabasi, H, Salimitorkamani, M and Turan, G (2023) Mutual coupling reduction between closely placed patch antennas using complementary U-shaped polarization converter. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 22(11), 2710–2714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, W, Zhu, X and Wang, L (2022) Simple structure E-plane decoupled millimeter wave antenna based on current cancellation model. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 70, 9871–9876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, M, Aziz, A and Malik, W (2022) A simple and modular MIMO antenna system for closely spaced patch antennas. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 64, 1210–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, H, Chen, Q and Ji, Y (2020) Weak-field-based self-decoupling patch antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 68, 4208–4217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Q, Pan, Y and Zheng, S (2021) Mutual coupling reduction in MIMO microstrip patch array using TM10 and TM02 modes. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 69, 7562–7571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y, Hu, Y and Zheng, S (2021) Design of low mutual coupling dielectric resonator antennas without using extra decoupling element. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 69, 7377–7385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Q, Pan, Y and Zheng, S (2023) A self-decoupling method for MIMO antenna array using characteristic mode of ground plane. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 71, 2126–2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, H, Hussain, N and Park, H (2022) Isolation in dual-sense CP MIMO antennas and role of decoupling structures. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 21, 1203–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, X, Chen, Z and Gu, T (2021) A wideband PIFA-pair-based MIMO antenna for 5G smartphones. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 20, 371–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, X and Du, Z (2023) Wideband shared-radiator four-element MIMO antenna module for 5G mobile terminals. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 71, 4799–4811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L and Liu, H (2022) Low-profile and miniaturized dual-band microstrip patch antenna for 5G mobile terminals. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 70, 2328–2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z, Zhu, L and Zhang, X (2019) A low-profile and high-gain CP patch antenna with improved AR bandwidth via perturbed ring resonator. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 18, 397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, Y, Weng, Z and Hou, D (2023) Bandwidth enhancement of metasurface antennas by shifting and reshaping high-order mode. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 22, 933–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Q, Guo, C and Ding, J (2018) Wideband metasurface-based reflective polarization converter for linear-to-linear and linear-to-circular polarization conversion. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 17, 1459–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolic, M, Djordjevic, A and Nehorai, A (2005) Microstrip antennas with suppressed radiation in horizontal directions and reduced coupling. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 53, 3469–3476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaboikis, M, Papamichael, V and Tsachtsiris, G (2008) Integrating compact printed antennas onto small diversity/MIMO terminals. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 56, 2067–2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M, Capobianco, A and Najam, A (2014) Compact ultra-wideband diversity antenna with a floating parasitic digitated decoupling structure. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 8, 747–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar