Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:11:54.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bootstrap approach for conformance assessment of measurement processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2011

R. Schmitt ,
P. Fritz  and
J. Lose
Get access

Abstract

This paper proposes a bootstrap approach to determine the measurement uncertainty of measurement devices with unknown measurement equation (in this work, a structured light projection system is applied for the measurement of pull broaches) by use of workpieces that are calibrated by a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). The obtained uncertainty is used to perform a conformance assessment of the initial measurement process according to ISO 14253-1 and VDA 5.

Keywords

Measurement uncertaintyCMMconformance assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , 2011 , pp. 19 - 24
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ISO 9000, Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary (2005)
ISO 9001, Quality management systems – Requirements (2000)
ISO 10012, Measurement management systems – Requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment (2003)
ISO/TS 16949, Quality management systems – Particular requirements for the application of ISO 9001:2008 for automotive production and relevant service part organizations (2009)
AIAG, Measurement System Analysis (MSA), 3rd edn. (2002)
Verband der Automobilindustrie, VDA 5 – Qualitätsmanagement in der Automobilindustrie, Prüfprozesseignung, 1st edn. (2003)
ISO 13005, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1999)
DIN EN ISO 14253-1, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment – Part 1: Decision rules for proving conformance or non-conformance with specifications (1999)
R. Schmitt, P. Fritz, et al., Estimation of Complex Measurements Systems by Statistical Simulation (in German), VDI Tagung Messunsicherheit praxisgerecht bestimmen (2008)
R. Schmitt, P. Fritz, et al., Evaluating the Uncertainty of Complex Measurement Systems, 14e Congress de Metrologie (2009)
ISO 15530-3, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Use of calibrated workpieces or standards (2004)
S. Driessen, B. Engelmann, B. Dietrich, Mit Planung ans Ziel – Das Strategietool IDENT für einen optimierten Einsatz von Fertigungsmesstechnik unter Qualitäts- und Kostenkriterien, Qualität und Zuverlässigkeit – Sonderheft Festschrift zur Emeritierung von Prof. Pfeifer (2004), pp. 19–20
Waeldele, F., Schwenke, H., Automated Calculation of Measurement Uncertainties on CMMs – Towards industrial application, Technisches Messen 69, 550–557 (2002) Google Scholar
Hernla, M., Task Specific Uncertainty in Coordinate Measurement, Technisches Messen 64, 286–293 (1997) Google Scholar
Forbes, A. B., Nonlinear Least Squares and Bayesian Inference, Adv. Math. Comput. Tools Metrol. Testing 8, 104–112 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar