Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:28:29.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost effective robust rule calibration system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

P. Greeff  and
O. Kruger
Get access

Abstract

One of the main calibration services of African NMIs (National Metrology Institutes) isthe measurement of tapes and rules. This is mainly regulated by legal metrology and OIML(International Organisation of Legal Metrology) specifications are therefore referenced.Specifically, OIML R-35 is the standard to which rules or line scales must conform. Theaccuracy of most African NMIs systems however, cannot prove conformance to thisspecification. This article will detail the development of a new, cost effective, linescale calibration system, which will have accuracy better than the specificationprescribed. The system was locally developed and its design is based onoff-the-shelf components and open source software. It is alsoready-for-upgrade to an absolute system. The system and details of theline detection algorithm will be presented.

Keywords

Rule calibrationline detection
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , 2014 , 402
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

OIML, R35-1 Material measures of length for general use, OIML (2007)
Python Software Foundation (2013), http://www.python.org/
Open Source Computer Vision Library (2013), http://opencv.org/
Numerical Python (2013), http://www.numpy.org/
About PyQt (2013), http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyQt4
Matas, J., Galambos, C., Kittler, J., Robust detection of lines using progressive probabilistic Hough transform, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 78, 119–137 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar