Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T22:36:26.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discrimination Based on Genetic Information in South Asia: An Exploratory Study of Constitutions and Relevant Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

Akash Open the ORCID record for Akash [Opens in a new window]  and
Shuvro Prosun Sarker Open the ORCID record for Shuvro Prosun Sarker [Opens in a new window]
Akash
Affiliation:
Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal – 721302, INDIA.
Shuvro Prosun Sarker
Affiliation:
Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal – 721302, INDIA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The progress in precision medicine has resulted in genomic technology spreading worldwide. This has raised concerns about the ethics of genetic data sharing and privacy. This article focuses on South Asia and first aims to identify, analyze, and understand the laws, regulations, and policies related to genetic data privacy and discrimination in that region. This is accomplished through a qualitative examination of existing laws and policies on privacy rights and a doctrinal analysis of legislation gathered from seven jurisdictions, viz. Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Following the presentation of the country-specific study, the article turns to discussing the study's results, which suggest that the area lacks both national norms and a regional policy specific to the protection of personal genetic data. The article then offers possible reasons for this outcome and suggests that the countries must formulate culturally sensitive regulations and universally applicable legal principles for genetic privacy notwithstanding the existing challenges of poverty, non-uniform demographics, and an absence of political will.

Keywords

genetic discriminationgenetic privacySouth Asiadata protectionprivacy law
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , Winter 2023 , pp. 183 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by International Association of Law Libraries

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 J. S. Khehar, C.J.I. et al., Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Ret.) and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. (AIR 2017 SC 4161).

2 J. S. Khehar, C.J.I. et al., Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

3 Buchanan, Carrie, “Revisiting the UNESCO Debate on a New World Information and Communication Order: Has the NWICO Been Achieved by Other Means?” Telematics and Informatics 32, no. 2 (May 2015): 391–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.007.

4 “Data Protection and Privacy Legislation Worldwide” (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Dec. 14, 2021), https://unctad.org/page/data-protection-and-privacy-legislation-worldwide.

5 Kim, Hannah et al., “Genetic Discrimination: Introducing the Asian Perspective to the Debate,” Npj Genomic Medicine 6, art. no. 54 (July 1, 2021)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00218-4.

6 Kim et al., “Genetic Discrimination.”

7 Wauters, Annet and Hoyweghen, Ine Van, “Global Trends on Fears and Concerns of Genetic Discrimination: A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Human Genetics 61, no. 4 (Apr. 2016): 275–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2015.151.

8 Yann Joly, “Genetic Discrimination and the Ghost of the Future Past,” The Wire Science, Mar. 1, 2023, https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/dna-genetic-discrimination/.

9 Joly, Yann and Dalpe, Gratien, “Genetic Discrimination Still Casts a Large Shadow in 2022,” European Journal of Human Genetics 30, no. 12 (Dec. 2022): 1320CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01194-8 (citing UNESCO, “Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights,” Nov. 11, 1997, https://en.unesco.org/themes/ethics-science-and-technology/human-genome-and-human-rights ).

10 Billings, Paul R., Kohn, Mel A., and Natowicz, Marvin R., “Discrimination as a Consequence of Genetic Testing,” American Journal of Human Genetics 50, no. 3 (1992): 476–82Google ScholarPubMed.

11 Reilly, Philip, “State Supported Mass Genetic Screening Programs,” in Genetics and the Law, eds. Milunsky, Aubrey and Annas, George J. (Boston: Springer US, 1976), 159–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2229-0_15.

12 World Health Organization, “Medical Genetic Services in Developing Countries: The Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetic Testing and Screening,” Human Genetics Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion, 2006, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43288/924159344X_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

13 Council of Europe, “Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine,” Apr. 4, 1997, https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98; “Article 11. Non-Discrimination - ‘Any form of discrimination against a person on grounds of his or her genetic heritage is prohibited.’”

14 See ECHR, European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe, “European Convention on Human Rights,” Strasbourg cedex, France, Aug. 2021, https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Convention_ENG; UNESCO, “International Declaration on Human Genetic Data,” Oct. 16, 2003, https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/international-declaration-human-genetic-data?hub=66535.

15 United Nations General Assembly, “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” no. 14668 (1966), https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20999/volume-999-I-14668-English.pdf.

16 UNESCO, “Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights,” Nov. 11, 1997, https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/universal-declaration-human-genome-and-human-rights.

17 UNESCO, “International Declaration on Human Genetic Data,” Oct. 16, 2003, https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/international-declaration-human-genetic-data?hub=66535.

18 Council of Europe, “Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine,” https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/-/council-of-europe-convention-for-the-protection-of-human-rights-and-dignity-of-the-human-being-with-regard-to-the-application-of-biology-and-medicin-2.

19 Council of Europe, Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, n 13.

20 Kim et al., “Genetic Discrimination,” n 5.

21 The International Cancer Genome Consortium, the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, and the International Human Epigenome Consortium are a few of these international groups.

22 Kim et al., “Genetic Discrimination” (n 5).

23 Ibid.

24 Joly, “Genetic Discrimination and the Ghost of the Future Past” (n 8).

25 Source: Hannah Kim et al., “Genetic Discrimination: Introducing the Asian Perspective to the Debate,” Npj Genomic Medicine 6, art. no. 54 (July 1, 2021), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-021-00218-4.

26 Joly, “Genetic Discrimination and the Ghost of the Future Past” (n 8).

27 Vibhushinie Bentotahewa, Chaminda Hewage, and Jason Williams, “The Normative Power of the GDPR: A Case Study of Data Protection Laws of South Asian Countries,” SN Computer Science 3, no. 3 (May 2022): 183, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01079-z.

28 Bentotahewa, Hewage, and Williams, “The Normative Power of the GDPR” (n 27).

29 Hosen, Mohammad Jakir et al., “Genetic Counseling in the Context of Bangladesh: Current Scenario, Challenges, and a Framework for Genetic Service Implementation,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 16, no. 1 (Apr. 9, 2021): 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01804-6.

30 Naimul Kabir, “Genetic Discrimination: A Reality in Bangladesh,” Dhaka Tribune, June 15, 2019, https://www.dhakatribune.com/health/2019/06/15/genetic-discrimination-a-reality-in-bangladesh.

31 Law Library of Congress, “Bangladesh: Right to Privacy Guaranteed by Constitution,” Global Legal Monitor - LLC, June 12, 2018, https://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/bangladesh-right-to-privacy-guaranteed-by-constitution/.

32 See art. 28, “The Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh” (1972), http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-367.html.

33 Bangladesh Labour Act, 2006 (XLII of 2006), § 195, https://mccibd.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Bangladesh-Labour-Act-2006_English-Upto-2018.pdf.

34 See para. 1.1, Bangladesh Medical & Dental Council, “Genetic Testing Guidelines,” BM&DC (2019).

35 Para. 2.4, Bangladesh Medical & Dental Council.

36 Munzur-e-Murshid and Mainul Haque, “Hits and Misses of Bangladesh National Health Policy 2011,” PubMed Central (PMC), Apr. 10, 2020, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373115/.

37 Bangladesh Bioethics Society (BBS, June 9, 2021), https://www.bioethics.org.bd.

38 “BBS - Constitution” (BBS, June 5, 2021), https://www.bioethics.org.bd/pages/constitution.php.

39 Constitution of the Kingdom of Bhutan (2008).

40 See Constitution of Bhutan, “Article 7 - A Bhutanese citizen shall have the right to equality before the law and shall not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, sex, language, religion, politics or other status.”

41 Labour and Employment Act of Bhutan (2007), §§ 11–13.

42 Labour and Employment Act, § 237, “‘discrimination’ means if a person is treated less favourably, either directly or indirectly, on the basis of race, colour, sex, marital status, pregnancy, religion, political opinion, social origin or involvement in a workers’ association or as an occupational health and safety representative.”

43 Ministry of Health, Bhutan, “National Health Policy” (2011), https://www.moh.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/moh-files/2015/11/National-Health-Policy.pdf.

44 See Bhutan Information, Communications and Media Bill 2019, ch. 17.

45 See Bhutan Information, Communication and Media Bill 2019, § 311.

46 Dept. of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, “UMMID & Genome India and Microbiome, BTIS Network,” https://dbtindia.gov.in/scientific-directorates/information-systems-ner/ummid-genome-india-and-microbiome-btis-network (last visited Jan. 9, 2024).

47 Dept. of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, “UMMID & Genome India.”

48 Dept. of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, “Consultation on Genetic Discrimination and Social Stigma” (2018).

49 Dept. of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, Cancer & Genetic Disorders, https://dbtindia.gov.in/scientific-directorates/health-wellness/cancer-genetic-disorders (last visited Jan. 9, 2024).

50 Dept. of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, “UMMID & Genome India.”

51 Dept. of Biotechnology, Government of India, “BIOTECH-PRIDE Guidelines,” July 2021, https://dbtindia.gov.in/sites/default/files/uploadfiles/Biotech%20PRIDE%20Guidelines.pdf.

“1.2 Modalities in which data are shared must protect privacy, confidentiality, security and should be non-discriminatory and fair, and no harm must be done to individuals as a result of human-data sharing. It should also honour relevant National and International agreements accepted by GoI on protection of rights on biodiversity and benefit sharing. The guidelines do not allow sharing of ‘sensitive data.’”

52 Constitution of India (1950).

53 Prathiba M. Singh, J., M/s United India Insurance Company Ltd. v Jai Parkash Tayal (Delhi High Court CM Nos. 45832/ & RFA 610/2016 2017).

54 Prathiba M. Singh, J., M/s United India Insurance Company Ltd. v Jai Parkash Tayal.

55 Ibid., para. A.12.

56 Ibid., para. B.4.

57 Ibid., para. B.5.

58 Ibid., para. F.1 (ii).

59 See order dated 27-08-2018 ROP under Diary no. 29590/2018, https://main.sci.gov.in/case-status.

60 SLP (c) No. 23789/2018.

61 Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, “National Health Policy” (2017), https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/9147562941489753121.pdf.

62 Government of India, “ICMR Guidelines” (2020), https://main.icmr.nic.in/guidelines?field_select_disease_tid=97.

63 Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, “National Policy for Rare Diseases” (2021), https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/Final%20NPRD%2C%202021.pdf.

64 Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, “The Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules” (2011), https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/338328.

65 Math, Suresh Bada et al., “The Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016: Challenges and Opportunities,” Indian Journal of Psychiatry 61, no. 10 (2019): 809Google Scholar, https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_105_19.

66 Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Protection of Human Rights Act (1993), https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/Protection%20of%20HR%20Act1993_0.pdf.

67 Government of India, “The Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act” (2016), https://lddashboard.legislative.gov.in/actsofparliamentfromtheyear/rights-persons-disabilities-act-2016.

68 Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, DNA Profiling Bill (Dept. of Biotechnology, Feb. 22, 2019).

69 Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, Digital Personal Data Protection Bill (2022), https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/The%20Digital%20Personal%20Data%20Protection%20Bill%2C%202022.pdf.

70 Dheena Hussain, trans., “Functional Translation of the Constitution of the Republic of Maldives,” Constitution of Maldives - The President's Office (2008), https://presidency.gov.mv/Pages/Index/15.

71 Government of the Republic of Maldives, “List of Treaties to which the Maldives Is Party to,” Dec. 2020, https://www.gov.mv/en/files/treaties-list-december-2020.pdf.

72 Paul H. Robinson, “Final Report of the Maldivian Penal Law and Sentencing Codification Project: Text of Draft Code (Volume 1) and Official Commentary (Volume 2),” Jan. 2006, https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/290.

73 Robinson, “Final Report.”

74 National Forum of Parliamentarians on Population and Development, Nepal, “Nepal's Constitution and Federalism Vision and Implementation” (2020), https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Nepals-Constitution-and-Federalism‗Vision-and-Implementation‗English.pdf.

75 “Nepal - Data Protection Overview,” Feb. 24, 2022, https://www.dataguidance.com/notes/nepal-data-protection-overview.

76 “Nepal - Data Protection Overview.”

77 Newpane Law Associates, “Introduction to the Privacy Act 2018,” Feb. 18, 2019, https://www.neupanelegal.com/news-detail/introduction-to-the-privacy-act-2018.html.

78 “Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations Towards Future Generations,” Nov. 12, 1997, https://en.unesco.org/about-us/legal-affairs/declaration-responsibilities-present-generations-towards-future-generations.

79 Government of Pakistan, “Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016” (Act no. XL of 2016), http://nasirlawsite.com/laws/peca1.htm.

80 National Assembly of Pakistan, “Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan” (1973, as modified to May 31, 2018), https://na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1549886415_632.pdf.

81 National Assembly of Pakistan, “Constitution.”

82 Bentotahewa, Hewage, and Williams, “The Normative Power of the GDPR” (n 27).

83 National Bioethics Committee Pakistan, “Safeguarding Publications in the Medical Field” (2007), http://nbcpakistan.org.pk/#:\textasciitilde:text=NBC-R%20is%20to%20safeguarding,publications%20in%20the%20medical%20field.

84 S. Khan, “Pakistan: Cousin Marriages Leading to Genetic Disorders,” Dw, July 2, 2022, https://www.dw.com/en/pakistan-cousin-marriages-create-high-risk-of-genetic-disorders/a-60687452.

85 Qasim, Iqbal et al., “Pakistan Genetic Mutation Database (PGMD): A Centralized Pakistani Mutome Data Source,” European Journal of Medical Genetics (EJMG) 61, no. 4 (Apr. 2018): 204–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2017.11.015.

86 Riaz, Moenn et al., “Implementation of public health genomics in Pakistan,” European Journal of Human Genetics 27, no. 10 (2019): 1485–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0428-z.

87 Prathiba Mahanamahewa, “Data Protection Law an E-Business and E-Government Perception” (2007), https://silo.tips/download/data-protection-law-an-e-business-and-e-government-perception.

88 Parliament of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, Personal Data Protection Act (Mar. 22, 2022), https://www.dataguidance.com/legal-research/personal-data-protection-act-no-9-2022.

89 Sri Lanka Medical Council, “Guidelines on Ethical Conduct for Medical and Dental Practitioners” (July 2009), https://www.mc.lk/images/publications/EthicalConduct.pdf.

90 See the texts of the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act of 2008 (United States) and the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act 2017 (Canada).

91 Hosen et al., “Genetic Counseling in the Context of Bangladesh” (n 29).

92 Ibid.

93 World Health Organization, “Medical Genetic Services in Developing Countries: The Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetic Testing and Screening” (2006), https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/43288/924159344X_eng.pdf.

94 Liu, Jianhong, Hebenton, Bill, and Jou, Susyan, eds., Handbook of Asian Criminology (New York: Springer, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://books.google.com/books/about/Handbook‗of‗Asian‗Criminology.html?id=5QFw0WHPJD8C.

95 Hargittai, Eszter, “Weaving the Western Web: explaining differences in internet connectivity among OECD countries,” Telecommunications Policy 23, nos. 10/11 (Nov. 1999): 701–08CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00050-6.

96 Nayanima Basu, “What the India-Nepal Peace Treaty is and why Nepal has problems with it,” The Print (Jan. 24, 2021), https://theprint.in/theprint-essential/what-the-india-nepal-peace-treaty-is-and-why-nepal-has-problems-with-it/591235/.

97 Sujeev Shakya, “India and Nepal: redefining a relationship,” Frontline (June 15, 2023), https://frontline.thehindu.com/world-affairs/india-and-nepal-need-to-redefine-their-relations-in-the-light-of-changing-realities-in-both-countries/article66945078.ece.

98 Miguel Angel Mendoza, “Challenges and Implications of Cybersecurity Legislation,” welivesecurity, Mar. 13, 2017, https://www.welivesecurity.com/2017/03/13/challenges-implications-cybersecurity-legislation/.

99 Miguel Angel Mendoza, “Challenges and Implications.”

100 Suparna Goswami, “Bangladesh to Propose a Privacy Law,” Bank Info Security, Feb. 2, 2021, https://www.bankinfosecurity.asia/bangladesh-to-propose-privacy-law-a-15898.

101 Dora Luo, “China - Data Protection Overview,” Nov. 2022, https://www.dataguidance.com/notes/china-data-protection-overview.

102 Daniel Hounslow, “Japan-Data Protection Overview,” Oct. 2022, https://www.dataguidance.com/notes/japan-data-protection-overview.

103 Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, § 2(i).

104 Ibid., § 2(j) – “Data Principal” means the individual to whom the personal data relates.

105 Ibid., § 8.

106 Douglas Beal, Enrique Rueda-Sabater, and Teresa Espirito Santo, “Comparing Socioeconomic Development Across Nations,” Nov. 27, 2012, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2012/public-sector-globalization-comparing-socioeconomic-development.