Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:30:43.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Africa and the Responsibility to Protect: Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act. Edited by Dan Kuwali and Frans Viljoen. Oxford and New York: Routledge, 2014. Pp. xviii, 398. ISBN: 978-041-5722-31-5. US$155.

Review products

Africa and the Responsibility to Protect: Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act. Edited by Dan Kuwali and Frans Viljoen. Oxford and New York: Routledge, 2014. Pp. xviii, 398. ISBN: 978-041-5722-31-5. US$155.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Mary Rumsey
Mary Rumsey*
Affiliation:
Willamette University College of Law, Salem, OR USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 43 , Issue 2_3 , Summer_Winter 2015 , pp. 448 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the International Association of Law Libraries. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4 Citizens for Global Action, White Paper, The Responsibility Not to Veto: A Way Forward(2010), http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/Responsibility_not_to_Veto_White_Paper_Final_7_14__2_.pdf Google Scholar

5 See, e.g., Umut Özsu, Ukraine, International Law, and the Political Economy of Self-Determination, 16 German L.J. 434, 441–442 (2015) (stating that R2P is not a rule of customary international law); William W. Burke-White, Power Shifts in International Law: Structural Realignment and Substantive Pluralism, 56 Harv. Int'l L.J. 1, 54 & n.318 (2015) (stating that some experts characterize R2P as an “emerging norm” of international law); Thomas H. Lee, The Law of War and the Responsibility to Protect Civilians: A Reinterpretation, 55 Harv. Int'l L.J. 251, 253 (2014) (claiming that the established right of a sovereign to protect its citizens abroad, combined with R2P, “constitute a single customary international law ground for unilateral humanitarian intervention in an unconsenting state where civilians are facing group extermination”).Google Scholar

6 Michael Byers, “International Law and the Responsibility to Protect,” in Theorising the Responsibility to Protect 107 (Ramesh Thakur & William Maley eds., 2015).Google Scholar