No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Judge in a Democracy. By Aharon Barak. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006. Pp.360. ISBN 978-0-691-12017-1.US$29.95.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2019
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2007 by the International Association of Law Libraries
References
1 THE JUDGE IN A DEMOCRACY is a substantially expanded version of an article that originally appeared in the Harvard Law Review. See Barak, Aharon, Foreword: The Role of a Supreme Court in a Democracy, 116 HARV.L.REV. 16 (2002). See also Aharon Barak, The Role of a Supreme Court in a Democracy, and the Fight Against Terrorism, 58 U. MIAM. L.REV. 125 (2003).Google Scholar
2 See, e.g., Sentelle, David B., “Judicial Discretion: Is one More of a Good Thing too Much?,” 88 MICH.L.Rev. 1828 (1990) (reviewing AHARON BARAK, JUDICIAL DISCRETION (1989).Google Scholar
3 On the controversial question as to whether Israel now has a written constitution, see infra, pp. 17ff.Google Scholar
4 Edelman, Martin, Israel in THE GLOBAL EXPANSION OF JUDICIAL POWER 403 (C.Neal Tate & Torbjorn Vallinder eds., 1995) 403; Hillel Neuer, Aharon Barak's Revolution, AZURE, Winter 1998, at 13, 18 available at http://www.azure.org.il (then follow “Neuer” hyperlink);Ruth Gavison, The Israeli Constitutional Process: Legislative Ambivalence and Judicial Resolute Drive 18 (Ctr. for the Study of Rationality, Discussion Paper # 380, 2005).Google Scholar
5 Dowty, Alan, Emergency Powers in Israel: The Devaluation of Crisis in COPING WITH CRISIS: HOW GOVERNMENTS DEAL WITH EMERGENCIES (Shao-chuan Leng, 1990)1, 2; Aharon Barak, Freedom of Speech in Israel: The Impact of the American Constitution“, 8 TEL AVIV U. STUD.L. 241, 248 (1985).Google Scholar
6 Edelman, , supra note 4, at 403; Gavison, supra note 4, at 21; Emily Bazelon, Let There Be Law, LEGAL. AFF., May-June 2002, at 25, 29.Google Scholar
7 Edelman, , supra note 4, at 403, 409; Stephen Goldstein, Protection of Human Rights by Judges: The Israeli Experience, 38 ST. L.U.L.J. 605, 616.Google Scholar
8 Edelman, Martin, Judicial Review and Israel's Struggles for a Written Constitution, in COMPARATIVE JUDICIAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC POLICY 157, 158 (Donald W. Jackson & C. Neal Tate eds., 1992); Menachem Hofnung, The Unintended Consequences of Unplanned Constitutional Reform: Constitutional Politics in Israel, 44 Am.L.Comp.L. 585, 588 (1996); Martin Edelman, The Status of the Israeli Constitution at the present Time, SHOFAR, June 22, 2003, at 7–8, available at http://www.highbeam.com; Dowty, supra note 5, at 24.Google Scholar
9 Cohn, Haim S., The First Fifty Years of the Supreme Court of Israel, 23 J.SUP.CT.HIST.SOC'Y 3 1999); Neuer, supra note 4, at 43n.16.Google Scholar
10 The Court sits in panels of three. The Supreme Court originally had six members, but is has not been increased to fourteen.Google Scholar
11 The actual appointment is made by Israel's largely ceremonial President.Google Scholar
12 Friedman, Ina, Court of Controversy, JERUSALEM RPT, Jan. 23, 2006, at 12, 16.Google Scholar
13 Shetreet, Shimon, The Critical Challenge of Judicial Independence in Israel, in JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN THE AGE OF DEMOCRACY: CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES FROM AROUND THE WORLD 233, 245–46 (Peter H. Russell & David. M. O'Brien eds., 2001)Google Scholar
14 Id., at 247.Google Scholar
15 Cohn, , supra note 9, at 5ff; Martin Edelman, The Changing Role of the Israeli Supreme Court, in COMPARATIVE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS 93, 99 (John R. Schmidhauser ed., 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Edelman, , supra note 4, at 406, 412; Shetreet, supra note 13, at 239; Edelman supra note 8, at 161. Paradoxically, the Justices have often been used to head or be part of commissions of inquiry into major public controversies on matters of the highest national importance. Justice Kahan led the inquiry into the Phalangist massacre of Palestinian refugees in Beirut. Judge Barak himself was a member of that commission. Supreme Court President Shimon Agranat headed a commission investigating responsibility for unprepared ness for the Yom Kippur War, which led to the resignations of Prime Minister Golda Meier and Defense Minister Moshe Dayan. Edelman, supra note 15, at 97; Shetreet, supra note 13, at 238.Google Scholar
17 PNINA LAHAV, JUDGMENT IN JERUSALEM: CHIEF JUSTICE AGRANAT AND THE ZIONIST CENTURY 92 (1997).Google Scholar
18 Menachem Hofnung, supra note 8, at 580, 590, 597; Gavison, supra note 4, at 12; Edelman, supra note 4, at 410; Never, supra note, at 13; LEHAV, supra note 17, at 96ff.; Amos Shapira, The Genesis and Impact of Rights Protection under Israel's Basic Law, 6 TOURO INT'L L.REV. 38–39; Martin Edelman, Human Rights in the Israeli Court Systems, Paper delivered at the 1980 Ann. Mtg,.AM.POL.SCI.ASS'N at p. 5.Google Scholar
19 Hofnung, , supra note 8, at 601. See also Edelman, supra note 4, at 410.Google Scholar
20 Shapira, , supra note 18, at 38–9; Edelman, supra note 4, at 410.Google Scholar
21 His father had been accused of being a Zionist.Google Scholar
22 Barak, , PURPOSIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE LAW (2005). See also Barak, JUDICIAL DISCRETION (1989).Google Scholar
23 Neuer, Hillel Aharon Barak's Revolution, AZURE, (1998) No. 3 at 14–15; Emily Bazelon, Let there be Law, LEGAL AFF, May-June 2002, at 26–27; Aharon Barak, The Role of the Judge in a Democracy, JUSTICE IN THE WORLD MAGAZINE NO. 3, available at http://justiceintheworld.org/n14/cover.shtml.Google Scholar
24 Bazelon, Emily, supra note at 6; Jonathan Rosenblum, “A Court of One”, Jerusalem Post, Oct. 15, 1999.Google Scholar
25 Neuer, , supra note 4, at 18.Google Scholar
26 Neuer, , supra note 4, at 14.Google Scholar
27 BARAK, AHARON, THE JUDGE IN A DEMOCRACY xi-xiv. (2006). 28 Id. at xiv, 119Google Scholar
29 Id. at xviiiGoogle Scholar
30 Id. at 125. In PURPOSIVE INTERPRETATION IN LAW (2005), Barak has applied purposive interpretation to the interpretation of all legal texts from contracts and wills to constitutions.Google Scholar
31 Id. at 201. In the chapter on judgments, Barak considers the judgment's levelGoogle Scholar
32 Id. at 194–97.Google Scholar
33 Id. at 216.Google Scholar
34 Id. at 237.Google Scholar
35 Id. at 281.Google Scholar
36 Id.Google Scholar
37 Id. at 306–07.Google Scholar
38 Id. at 308.Google Scholar
39 Id. at 310–11.Google Scholar
40 Id. at 312.Google Scholar
41 Id. at 35.Google Scholar
42 Id. at 179.Google Scholar
43 Id. at 177.Google Scholar
44 Neuer, , supra note 4, at 19ff.Google Scholar
45 BARAK, supra note 27, at 42.Google Scholar
46 Id. at 44.Google Scholar
47 Id. at 45.Google Scholar
48 Id. at 49–50.Google Scholar
49 Id. at 178ff. See also Id. at 183.Google Scholar
50 H.C. 910/86 Ressler v. Minister of Defense, 42 P.D. 441, available at www.court.gov.il Google Scholar
51 See Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 217 (1962).Google Scholar
52 Barak, , supra note 27, at 179.Google Scholar
53 H.C. 910/86, Ressler v. Minister of Defense, 42(2) P.D. 441 available at www.court.gov.il.Google Scholar
54 Id. at 179.Google Scholar
55 Id.Google Scholar
56 H.C.6315/97, Federman v. Prime Minister (unreported). See Barak, supra note 27, at 180 n. 12.Google Scholar
57 H.C. 73/85 “Kach” Faction v. Chairman of Knesset, 39 (3) P.D. 141, 163. See Barak, supra note 27, at 184–85.Google Scholar
58 See Barak, supra note 27, at 185.Google Scholar
59 Id. at 188.Google Scholar
60 Edelman, , supra note 4, at 411.Google Scholar
61 H.C. 390/79, Dawikat v. Gov't of Israel, 34 (1) P.D. 1.Google Scholar
62 H.C. 428/86 Barzilai v. Gov't of Israel, 40 (3) P.D. 505 available at www.court.gov.il.Google Scholar
63 H.C. 5100/94 Pub. Comm. Against Torture in Isr. V. Gov't. Of Israel, 53 (4) P.D. 817, [1998–99 Isr.L.R. 567]. See also Barak, supra note 27, at 189.Google Scholar
64 531 U.S. 79 (2000) see also Barak, supra note 30 at 188.Google Scholar
65 ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES 130, 143–45 2nd. Ed. 2002).Google Scholar
66 Edelman, , supra note 4, at 411.Google Scholar
67 Barak, , supra note 27, at 192–93.Google Scholar
68 Id. at 194.Google Scholar
69 R.v. Inland Revenue Commissioner, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Business Ltd., [1982] A.C. 617, 644. See also Barak, supra note 27, at pp. 194–95.Google Scholar
70 Id. at 196.Google Scholar
71 H.C. 935/89 Ganor v. Attorney General, 44 (2) P.D. 485, in PUBLIC LAW IN ISRAEL 334ff (Itzhak Zamir & Allen Zysblat, eds., 1996).Google Scholar
72 H.C. 5167/00, Weiss v. Prime Minister, 55 (2) P.D. 455.Google Scholar
73 H.C. 1920/00 Gaton v. Parole Board, 54 (2) P.D. 31–3.Google Scholar
74 Shetreet, , supra note 13, at 233, 237.Google Scholar
75 Barak, , supra note 27, at 285.Google Scholar
76 Id. at 287.Google Scholar
77 Id. at 299.Google Scholar
78 Id. at 285.Google Scholar
79 Id. at 286.Google Scholar
80 Id. at 304.Google Scholar
81 Bazelon, , supra note 6, at 30–31.Google Scholar
82 H.C. 680/88 Schnitzler v. Chief Military Censor, 42(4) P.D. 1. See also Shetreet, supra note 13, at 238.Google Scholar
83 Bazelon supra note 6, at 26, 32.Google Scholar
84 Friedman, Ina, Court of Controversy, JERUSALEM RPT., Jan. 23, 2006, at 12, 13.Google Scholar
85 BARAK, supra note 27, at 297.Google Scholar
86 Id. at 301.Google Scholar
87 Id. at 293, 300.Google Scholar
88 Id. at 296–97.Google Scholar
89 Id. at 303.Google Scholar
90 Neuer, , supra note 4, at 17.Google Scholar
91 Id.Google Scholar
92 H.C. 98/69, Bergman v. Minister of Finance, P.D. (I) 23:693–705 (1969), in PUBLIC LAW IN ISRAEL, supra note 74, at 310.Google Scholar
93 Edelman, , supra note 15, at 101ff; Edelman, supra note 8, at 162ff; Gavison, supra note 4 at 12–13.Google Scholar
94 Gavison, , supra note 4, at 13. Edelman, supra note 8, at 165; 165; Edelman, supra note 15, at 104–05.Google Scholar
95 H.C. 390/79 Dwikat v. Gov't of Israel, 34 (1) P.D. 1. See also Hofnung, supra note 8, at 590; Shetreet, supra note 13, at 237–238; Edelman, supra note 15, at 106.Google Scholar
96 See Hofnung, supra note 8, at 593–94.Google Scholar
97 H.C. 652/81 M.K. Sarid v. Chairman of the Knesset M. Savidor, 36 (2) P.D. 197.Google Scholar
98 Shetreet, , supra note 13, at 235.Google Scholar
99 Friedman, , supra note 12, at 15.Google Scholar
100 Hofnung, , supra note 8, at 600.Google Scholar
101 Hofnung, , supra note 8, at 590–91.Google Scholar
102 Edelman, supra note at 8.Google Scholar
103 Although the Knesset is constituted of 120 members, the votes on the two Basic Laws were 23–0 and 32–21.Google Scholar
104 Bazelon, , supra note 6, at p. 26; Edelman, supra note 8, at 3; Dorner, Does Israel Have a Constitution?, 43 ST.L.U.L.J. 1325, 1327–28 (1999); Barak, The Constitutionalization of the Israeli Legal System as a Result of the Basic Laws and Its Effect on Procedural and Substantive Criminal Law 3 (Nos. 1–3, 1997);Google Scholar
105 Barak, , supra note 107, at 7.Google Scholar
106 Gavison, , supra note 4, at 14–15. The case was the Mitral case, HC 3827/93. It appears that Barak was involved in the details of the 1992 legislation and presented special comments on the 1994 amendments. Gavison, supra note 4, at 17.Google Scholar
107 Unified Mizrachi Bank Ltd. V. Migdal Collective Village, 49(4) P.D. 221, CA 6821/93. (Nov. 9, 1995). See also Edelman, supra note 8 at 10; Never, supra note 4, at 36ff.Google Scholar
108 Neuer, , supra note 4, at 13.Google Scholar
109 Hofnung, , supra note 8, at 597ff.Google Scholar
110 See Hirschl, Ran, Israel's ‘Constitutional Revolution': The Legal Interpretation of Entrenched Civil Liberties in an Emerging Neo-Neo-Liberal Economic Order, 46 AM.J.COMP.L. 427, 444; Ariel L. Bendor, The Israeli Constitutionalism: Between legal Formalism and Judicial Activism 1 available at http://ccc.uchicago.edu/docs/bendor.pdf (last checked May 3, 2006)Google Scholar
111 Hofnung, , supra note 8, at 602.Google Scholar
112 Gavison, , supra note 4, at 28. See also Ari Shavit, Ruth Gavison Loyal Opposition, HAARETZ, December 12, 1999 available at http://www.netanyahu.org/loyoparishav.html.Google Scholar
113 Gavison, , supra note 4, at 11.Google Scholar
114 Shavit, , supra note 115, at 6.Google Scholar
115 Gordon, Evelyn, Aharon Barak's Agenda, Jerusalem Post; Nov 17, 2005 at 16.Google Scholar
116 Hofnung, , supra note 8, at 2Google Scholar
117 Never, , supra note 4, at 3.Google Scholar
118 Shavit, , supra note, 115 at 6.Google Scholar
119 Eidelberg, Paul, The Hidden Agenda of Ariel Sharon and Aharon Barak 4, Nov. 2, 2005 http://www.theraphi.com/ppe/thaoasaab.html Google Scholar
120 Edelman, , supra note 8, at 12–13.Google Scholar
121 Bazelon, , supra note 6, at 26, 32.Google Scholar
122 Friedman, , supra note 12, at 12–13.Google Scholar
123 Gavison, , supra note 4, at 18, n. 56.Google Scholar
124 Shetreet, , supra note 13, at 241.Google Scholar
125 Edelman, , supra note 4, at 406.Google Scholar
126 Shavit, , supra note 115, at 5–6.Google Scholar
127 Shavit, , supra note 115, at 5–6; Friedman, supra note 12, at 16.Google Scholar
128 Barak, , supra note 27, at 22–23.Google Scholar
129 Morris, Jeffrey B. is a Professor of Law at the Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center of Touro College. Newman, Shari G. graduated from Touro Law School in 2006.Google Scholar