Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:50:54.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Considerations Relating to the Compilation of a Legal Thesaurus in German

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2019

Henning Groll
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The basic need for unification and clarification of technical terminology is probably to be met with in all branches of learning. The lawyers might form an exception to this since legal science by its very nature is, to a very large extent, a conceptual science. It is worth while, nevertheless, to examine the question whether a uniform legal thesaurus for the legal systems in the area in which German is spoken is necessary; that is to say, a thesaurus which could, among other things, contribute to a unification of legal terminology. The following report should not be understood as a contribution to the basic problems of a thesaurus as a documentation language of a special kind. Those considerations and questions will, however, be briefly examined which could arise in connection with the compilation and development of a special legal thesaurus.

Type
Thesaurus Problems
Information
International Journal of Law Libraries , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 1974 , pp. 13 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © International Association of Law Libraries 1974 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Verlag C. F. Müller 1972, Karlsruhe, 487 p., 48.– DM. See p. 21–27. English Summary 56 p., 10.– DM.Google Scholar

2 Informationskrise des Rechts und Datenverarbeitung. Karlsruhe 1970.Google Scholar

3 e.g. JIS.Google Scholar

4 For details see JIS-Bericht, p. 401 et seq.Google Scholar

5 Zbl. Bibl.-Wesen Jg. 86 (1972) p. 675.Google Scholar

6 cf. Die Informationsmacher. Zur Fragwürdigkeit einer privaten Datenbank für Rechtsdokumentation – die Firma Juradat. Hrsg. v. d. Arbeitsgruppe ”EDV und Recht“, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar

7 JIS-Bericht, p. 452.Google Scholar

8 cf. Number 5, Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri (Fachnormenausschuß Bibliotheks- u. Dokumentationswesen im Deutschen Normcnausschuß, DIN 1463) (1972).Google Scholar

9 Laisiepen-Lutterbeck-Meyer-Uhlcnried: Grundlagen der praktischen Information u. Dokumentation, München, 1972, p. 276.Google Scholar

10 Laisiepen, p. 312. See also: Dehnhard, H., UDC and Thesaurus.Google Scholar

11 Laisiepen, p. 276 Manuscript of a report, Universitätsbibliothek Bochum 1973.Google Scholar

12 Uhlig in: Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für juristisches Bibliotheks- u. Dokumentationswesen, April 1973, p. 53.Google Scholar

13 cf. Lloyd, G. A.: The Universal Decimal Classification as a Switching Language. In: Subject Retrieval in the Seventies; ed. by Hans Wellisch and Thomas D. Wilson. Westport, Conn., 1972.Google Scholar