Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:04:24.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unearthing bureaucratic legal consciousness: government officials’ legal identification and moral ideals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2015

Sally Richards
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The legal consciousness of citizens receiving the law has been extensively explored but little attention has been paid to the legal consciousness of individuals applying the law. This paper draws on interviews with forty government officials in the Refugee Review Tribunal of Australia to address this concern, analysing how government bureaucrats think about law. In doing so, it identifies a series of underlying ideals informing the officials’ legal identification narratives. It presents a heuristic that positions bureaucratic legal identification in relation to broader moral ideals, demonstrating that as government officials’ identification with law increases so too does their idealisation of intellect and information processing. Conversely, as the officials’ identification with law decreases, their idealisation of experience and truth verification increases. These findings provide new insights into how law works in government, revealing bureaucratic legal identification as structured according to broader moral values, and thereby unearthing legal consciousness’ latent metacognitive dimension.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 299 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Government (2012–2013) ‘Migration Review Tribunal and Refugee Review Tribunal Annual Report’, online: <http://www.mrt-rrt.gov.au/AnnualReports/ar1213/part-2.html> (last accessed 20 May 2015).+(last+accessed+20+May+2015).>Google Scholar
Carver, Charles and Scheider, Michael (1998) On the Self-Regulation of Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina (1995) ‘Local Government Legal Consciousness in the Shadow of Juridification’, Journal of Law and Society 22: 506–526.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger (2004) ‘Ideals and Values in Law: A Comment on the Importance of Ideals’, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtsheorie 33: 288–298.Google Scholar
Cowan, Dave (2004) ‘Legal Consciousness: Some Observations’, Modern Law Review 67: 928–958.Google Scholar
Devod, Theirry, Huyuh, Que-Lam and Banaji, Mahzann (2003) ‘Implicit Self and Identity’, in Leary, Mark and Tangney, June (eds), Handbook of Self and Identity. New York: Guilford Press, 155–179.Google Scholar
Engel, David (1998) ‘How Does the Law Matter in the Constitution of Legal Consciousness?’, in Garth, Bryan and Sarat, Austin (eds), How Does the Law Matter? Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 109–144.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan (1998) The Common Place of Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Simon and Morgan, Bronwen (2013) ‘I Fought the Law and the Law Won: Legal Consciousness and the Critical Imagination’, Current Legal Problems 66: 68–88.Google Scholar
Halliday, Simon and Schmidt, Patrick (2009) Conducting Law and Society Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Rosie (2006) ‘“Dogs are ‘Registered’, People Shouldn't Be” Legal Consciousness and Gay and Lesbian Rights’, Social and Legal Studies 15: 511–533.Google Scholar
Hertogh, Marc (2004a) ‘A “European” Conception of Legal Consciousness: Rediscovering Eugen Ehrlich’, Journal of Law and Society 31: 457–481.Google Scholar
Hertogh, Marc (2004b) ‘The Living Rechtsstaat: A Bottom-Up Approach to Legal Ideals and Social Reality’, in Van Der Burg, Wibren and Taekema, Sanne (eds), The Importance of Ideals: Debating Their Relevance in Law, Morality and Politics. Brussels: Library of Congress, 75–95.Google Scholar
Hertogh, Marc (2009) ‘Through the Eyes of Bureaucrats: How Front-Line Officials Understand Administrative Justice’, in Adler, Michael (ed.), Administrative Justice in Context. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 203–225.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Elizabeth (2003) ‘Legal Consciousness and Dispute Resolution: Different Disputing Behaviour at Two Similar Taxicab Companies’, Law and Social Inquiry 26: 691–716.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry (1983) Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard-Moody, Steven and Musheno, Michael (2003) Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front-Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engel (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working Class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
NIELSEN, Laura Beth (2000) ‘Situating Legal Consciousness Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment’, Law and Society Review 34: 1055–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1990) ‘The Law is All Over … Power Resistance and Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor’, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2: 343–379.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip (2008) A Humanist Science: Values and Ideals in Social Inquiry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan (2005) ‘After Legal Consciousness’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1: 323–368.Google Scholar
Stets, Jan and Burke, Peter (2003) ‘A Sociological Approach to Self and Identity’, in Leary, Mark and Tangney, June (eds), Handbook of Self and Identity. New York: Guilford Press, 128–152.Google Scholar
Taekema, Sanne (2003) Concept of Ideals in Legal Theory. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Taekema, Sanne (2004) ‘What Ideals Are: Ontological and Epistemological Issues’, in Van Der Burg, Wibren and Taekema, Sanne (eds), The Importance of Ideals: Debating Their Relevance in Law, Morality and Politics. Brussels: Library of Congress, 39–57.Google Scholar
Van Der Burg, Wibren and Taekema, Sanne (eds) (2004) The Importance of Ideals: Debating their Relevance in Law, Morality and Politics. Brussels: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. and ed. Shils, E. A. and Finch, H. A.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar