Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T08:36:43.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration: to what extent are human rights and sustainable development mutually compatible in the field of migration?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2020

Elspeth Guild
Elspeth Guild*
Affiliation:
Jean Monnet Professor ad personam, Queen Mary University of London
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this contribution, I examine the links between the human rights basis of the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) and its embeddedness in the UN Sustainable Development Agenda 2030. While the GCM grew out of a development framework, it was rapidly incorporated into the UN human rights system. Even during the negotiation of the GCM, human rights took priority over development. The resistance that was manifested against the GCM on its endorsement by the UN General Assembly was directed not against its development links, but rather concerns about its human rights impact. This paper examines the placing of migration in this dual framework and the ways in which outcomes compatible with both are achievable.

Keywords

human rights lawmigrationmigration–development nexusmigrants’ rightsSustainable Development Agenda 2030Global Compact for SafeOrderly and Regular Migration
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 16 , Special Issue 3: Migrants' Rights Finally Front and Centre of the International Agenda? Exploring the Perils and Possibilities of the SDGs and the GCM , September 2020 , pp. 239 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitsi-Selmi, A (2015) The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: renewing the global commitment to people's resilience, health, and well-being. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 6, 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P and Crawford, J (eds) (2000) The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, S and Sen, A (1997) ‘Concepts of human development and poverty: a multidimensional perspective’. Reprinted in Fukuda-Parr, S and Shiva Kumar, AK (eds) (2003) Readings in Human Development. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G (2015) Dualism revisited: international law and interindividual law. Rivista Di Diritto Internazionale, Anno LXXXVI Fosc 4, 909–999.Google Scholar
Bakewell, O (2009) Migration, diasporas and development: some critical perspectives. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 229, 787–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, C and Parnell, S (2016) Ideas, implementation and indicators: epistemologies of the post-2015 urban agenda. Environment and Urbanization 28, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beine, M, Docquier, F and Rapoport, H (2001) Brain drain and economic growth: theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics 64, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, JN (1976) Taxing the brain drain. Challenge 19, 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigo, D and Guild, E (eds) (2005) Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caprotti, F et al. (2017) The new urban agenda: key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice. Urban Research & Practice 10, 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, JH (1992) Migration and morality: a liberal egalitarian perspective. In Barry, B and Goodin, RE (eds), Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money. London: Routledge, 25–47.Google Scholar
Chetail, V (2008) Paradigm and paradox of the migration–development nexus: the new border for north–south dialogue. German Yearbook of International Law 53, 183–215.Google Scholar
Cholewinski, R (1997) Migrant Workers in International Human Rights Law: Their Protection in Countries of Employment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cole, P (2000) Philosophies of Exclusion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Colglazier, W (2015) Sustainability: Sustainable Development Agenda: 2030. Science 349, 1048–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constant, AF, Nottmeyer, O and Zimmermann, KF (2013) The economics of circular migration. In Constant, AF (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Migration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 55–74.Google Scholar
Costello, C (2016) The Human Rights of Migrants in European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, P (2001) Constitutions, constitutionalism, and the European Union. European Law Journal 7, 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauvergne, C (2017) Making people illegal. In Crock, M (ed.), Migrants and Rights. London: Routledge, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haas, H (2005) International migration, remittances and development: myths and facts. Third World Quarterly 26, 1269–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haas, H (2010) Migration and development: a theoretical perspective. International Migration Review 44, 227–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sousa, CU (2019) How to break the security-migration nexus and ensure a human-rights based management of international migration? In de Sousa, CU (ed.), The Relevance of Migration for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. Lisbon: Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, 107–147.Google Scholar
Desmond, A (2015) The triangle that could square the circle? The UN International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, the EU and the Universal Periodic Review. European Journal of Migration and Law 17, 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, A (2017) A vexed relationship: the ICRMW vis-à-vis the EU and its Member States. In Desmond, A (ed.), Shining New Light on the UN Migrant Workers Convention. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 295–321.Google Scholar
Docquier, F and Rapoport, H (2012) Globalization, brain drain, and development. Journal of Economic Literature 50, 681–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, A (1992) The transnational migration of people seen from within a natural law tradition. In Barry, B and Goodin, RE (eds), Free Movement: Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of Money. London: Routledge, 169–180.Google Scholar
Farahat, A (2009) The exclusiveness of inclusion: on the boundaries of human rights in protecting transnational and second generation migrants. European Journal of Migration and Law 11, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft-Hansen, T (2007) The Extraterritorialisation of Asylum and the Advent of Protection Lite. DIIS Working Paper 2. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.Google Scholar
Gil-Garcia, JR, Pardo, TA and Nam, T (eds) (2016) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda: A Comprehensive View of the 21st Century City. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuffré, M (2012) Watered-down rights on the high seas: Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 61, 728–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliano, P and Ruiz-Arranz, P (2009) Remittances, financial development, and growth. Journal of Development Economics 90, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glytsos, NP (2002) The role of migrant remittances in development: evidence from Mediterranean countries. International Migration 40, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guadagno, L (2016) Human mobility in the Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 7, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, E (1998) Competence, discretion and third country nationals: the European Union's legal struggle with migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 24, 613–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, E (2017) The UN's search for a global compact on safe, orderly and regular migration. German Law Journal 18, 1779–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, E (2018) The Global Compact as a milestone in global governance of migration. Global Social Policy 18, 325–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, E and Stoyanova, V (2018) The human right to leave any country: a right to be delivered. European Yearbook on Human Rights, 373–394.Google Scholar
Guild, E, Grant, S and Groenendijk, CA (eds) (2017) Human Rights of Migrants in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, D and Tillie, J (2004) Introduction: Social capital and political integration of migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, D (2005) Remittances: the new development mantra? In Maimbo, SM and Ratha, D (eds), Remittances: Development Impact and Future Prospects. Washington, DC: World Bank, 331–360.Google Scholar
Kelman, I and Glantz, MH (2015) Analyzing the Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 6, 105–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloke-Lesch, A (2015) The G20 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): reflections on future roles and tasks. G20 and Global Governance: Blue Book of G20 Think Tank 2015–2016. Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, 55–71.Google Scholar
Lavenex, S and Kunz, R (2008) The migration–development nexus in EU external relations. Journal of European Integration 30, 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGoldrick, D (1996) Sustainable development and human rights: an integrated conception. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 45, 796–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantouvalou, V (2006) Servitude and forced labour in the 21st century: the human rights of domestic workers. Industrial Law Journal 35, 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, L (2011) Policing EU's external borders: a challenge for the rule of law and fundamental rights in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice? An analysis of Frontex Joint Operations at the southern maritime border. Journal of Contemporary European Research 4, 468–487.Google Scholar
Montes, MF (2016) Five Points on the Addis Ababa Action Agenda. South Centre Policy Brief No. 24. Geneva: South Centre.Google Scholar
Moreno-Lax, V (2012) Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy or the Strasbourg Court versus extraterritorial migration control? Human Rights Law Review 12, 574–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Lax, V and Giuffré, M (2019) The rise of consensual containment: from ‘contactless control’ to ‘contactless responsibility’ for forced migration flows. In Juss, SS (ed.), Research Handbook on International Refugee Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 82–108.Google Scholar
Nyberg-Sørensen, N and Van, Hear N (2002) The migration–development nexus: evidence and policy options. state-of-the-art overview. International Migration 405, 3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, N (2008) The ‘migration–development nexus’ revisited from a rights perspective. Journal of Human Rights 7, 282–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, N (2017) Migration and the SDGs. Global Social Policy 17, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghuram, P (2009) Caring about ‘brain drain’ migration in a postcolonial world. Geoforum 40, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratha, D (2007) Leveraging Remittances for Development. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Rijpma, JJ and Cremona, M (2007) The Extra-territorialisation of EU Migration Policies and the Rule of Law. EUI Law Working Papers. Florence: European University Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, M and Özden, C (eds) (2005) International Migration, Remittances and the Brain Drain. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A (2000) A decade of human development. Journal of Human Development 1, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silga, J (2012) Shifting perspective on the migration and development nexus in the context of the European Union: from the migration management approach to the development paradigm of mobility? In Framework for Economic Development in EU External Relations. EUI Working Papers 115–144. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Silga, J (2013) The Legal Dimension of the Migration–Development Nexus in the European Union Policy Framework. Diss. 2013. Luxembourg: University of Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Silga, J (2015) Assessing the consistency of European Union development cooperation with readmission in the EU-Philippines Agreement case – a balancing exercise. European Law Review 40, 439–457.Google Scholar
Starke, JG (1936) Monism and dualism in the theory of international law. British Yearbook of International Law 17, 66.Google Scholar
Torpey, JC (2000) The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S (2008) Circular migration: the way forward in global policy? Canadian Diversity 6, 36–40.Google Scholar
Von, Bogdandy A (2008) Pluralism, direct effect, and the ultimate say: on the relationship between international and domestic constitutional law. International Journal of Constitutional Law 6, 397–413.Google Scholar
Weber, M (1964) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Henderson, AM and Parsons, T (trans.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C and Blaiklock, A (2016) A human rights discourse in the sustainable development agenda avoids obligations and entitlements: comment on rights language in the sustainable development agenda: has right to health discourse and norms shaped health goals? International Journal of Health Policy and Management 5, 387–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiskow, C (2006) Health Worker Migration Flows in Europe: Overview and Case Studies in Selected CEE Countries – Romania, Czech Republic, Serbia and Croatia. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar