Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T09:47:51.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shaking Mr Jones: law and touch1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Emily Grabham
Emily Grabham*
Affiliation:
Kent Law School, University of Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is about how law constructs its own truths through touch. Whilst there has been an impressive body of work on how the visual paradigm permeates law, less has been written about the other senses and their connected clusters of knowledge, specifically the haptic – or touch-related – paradigm. One of the aims of the article, therefore, is to bring touch to sociolegal theory. Another aim, however, is to trace some ways in which encounters, dispositions, feelings and contact – all forms of touch in themselves – shape law’s objects and parameters. The case-studies in this article all raise the question of how touch constitutes the proper function of criminal regulation in relation to embodied encounters – the nude body in public, the alternative sexual space.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 343 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmed, Sara (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan (2000) The Passions of Law. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bently, Lionel and Flynn, Leo (eds) (1996) Law and the Senses: Sensational Jurisprudence. London and Chicago: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Boura, Malcolm (2007) ‘Naturism Beach Code: A British Naturism Policy Paper’ Available at: www.british-naturism.org.uk/mediacentre/files/briefing_beach_code.pdf [last checked 10 April 2009].Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy (1995) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candlin, Fiona (2008) ‘Touch and the Limits of the Rational Museum Or Can Matter Think?’, The Senses and Society 3(3): 277–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, Constance (2005) ‘The Witch’s Senses: Sensory Ideologies and Transgressive Femininities from the Renaissance to Modernity’ in Howes, David (ed.) Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. New York: Berg, 70–84.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina (2007) ‘“Well, You Go There to Get Off.” Visiting Feminist Care Ethics Through a Women’s Bathhouse’, Feminist Theory 8(3): 243–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Davina (2008) ‘Intersectional Travel Through Everyday Utopias: The Difference Sexual and Economic Dynamics Make’ in Grabham, Emily, Cooper, Davina, Krishnadas, Jane and Herman, Didi (eds) Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power, and the Politics of Location. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 299–325.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina (forthcoming) ‘Stripping the Public Bare: Reflecting on Equality through Nudism’ Antipode.Google Scholar
Cvetkovich, A (2003) An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality and Lesbian Public Cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gabrys, Jennifer (2007) ‘Automatic Sensation: Environmental Sensors in the Digital City’ The Senses and Society 2(2): 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabham, Emily (2009) ‘Intersectionality: Traumatic Impressions’ in Grabham, Emily, Cooper, Davina, Krishnadas, Jane and Herman, Didi (eds) Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power, and the Politics of Location. Routledge-Cavendish, 183–201.Google Scholar
Hibbitts, Bernard J. (1994) ‘Making Sense of Metaphors: Visuality, Aurality, and the Reconfiguration of American Legal Discourse’ Cardozo Law Review 16: 229–356.Google Scholar
Howes, David (2005) (ed.) Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry (2006) ‘Law and Emotion: A Proposed Taxonomy of an Emerging Field’, Law and Human Behavior 30: 119–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noonan, Sheila (2002) ‘Of Death, Desire, and Knowledge: Law and Social Control of Witches in Renaissance Europe’ in McDonald, Gayle M. (ed.) Social Context and Social Location in the Sociology of Law. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 91–129.Google Scholar
Parisi, David (2008) ‘Fingerbombing or “Touching is Good”: The Cultural Construction of Technologized Touch’, The Senses and Society 3(3): 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sally, Lynn (2006) ‘Fantasy Lands and Kinesthetic Thrills: Sensorial Consumption, the Shock of Modernity and Spectacle as Total-Body Experience at Coney Island’, The Senses and Society 1(3): 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde, Mariana (2003) Law’s Dream of a Common Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana and Cirak, Miomir (2003) ‘Governing Bodies, Creating Gay Spaces: Policing and Security Issues in “Gay” Downtown Toronto’, British Journal of Criminology 43: 102–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weait, Matthew (1996) ‘Fleshing it out’ in Bently, Lionel and Flynn, Leo (eds) Law and the Senses: Sensational Jurisprudence. London and Chicago: Pluto Press, 160–75.Google Scholar