Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:26:44.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: marginalisation in law, policy and society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2022

David Gurnham
David Gurnham*
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Southampton, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introducing our Special Issue on marginalisation, this paper considers some of the challenges that this topic poses for legal scholars. The paper identifies that these challenges arise principally from the ambivalence of ‘marginalisation’ itself: at once an idea so broad that it arguably underpins the bulk of legal research (and socio-legal research in particular), but at the same time an idea that in practice too often quickly gives way to various other neighbouring ones: disadvantage, discrimination, disempowerment, exclusion, inequality, silencing, stigmatisation, victimisation and so on. This paper considers this ambivalence and traces etymological roots (and routes) by which we understand the margin, the marginalised and marginalisation.

Keywords

marginalisationmarginalisemarginalmarginlaw and policy
Type
Special Issue Introduction
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 18 , Special Issue 1: Marginalisation in Law, Policy and Society , March 2022 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, R (1999) The dance and the adjudication of disputes. Rutgers Law Review 51, 906–910.Google Scholar
Agozino, B (2000) Theorizing otherness, the war on drugs and incarceration. Theoretical Criminology 4, 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertson, K, Corcoran, M and Phillips, J (eds) (2020) Marketisation and Privatisation in Criminal Justice. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Altay, T, Yurdakul, G and Korteweg, AC (2021) Crossing borders: the intersectional marginalization of Bulgarian Muslim trans*immigrant sex workers in Berlin. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47, 1922–1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R, Taylor, E and Walter, M (2010) Burying indigeneity: the spatial construction of reality and aboriginal Australia. Social and Legal Studies 19, 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhart, RK (2010) Chambers Dictionary of Etymology. London: Chambers.Google Scholar
Barr, O (2016) A Jurisprudence of Movement: Common Law, Walking, Unsettling Place. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Youssef, N and Tamari, SS (2018) Enshrining discrimination: Israel's nation-state law. Journal of Palestine Studies 48, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhopal, K, Brown, H and Jackson, J (2016) BME academic flight from UK to overseas higher education: aspects of marginalization and exclusion. British Educational Research Journal 42, 240–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, FL (2017) Obscenity and marginality. Law and Humanities 11, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P (2005) Narrative in and out of the law. In Phelan, J and Rabinowitz, PJ (eds), A Companion to Narrative Theory. London: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burridge, A and Gill, N (2017) Conveyor-belt justice: precarity, access to justice, and uneven geographies of legal aid in UK asylum appeals. Antipode 49, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codd, H (1998) Prisoners’ families: the ‘forgotten victims’. Probation Journal 45, 148–154.Google Scholar
Davies, M (2017) Law Unlimited: Materialism, Pluralism and Legal Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beco, G (2018) Protecting the invisible: an intersectional approach to international human rights law. Human Rights Law Review 17, 633–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dymock, A (2017) Prurience, punishment and the image: reading ‘law-and-order pornography’. Theoretical Criminology 21, 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, T (2018) On Comics and Legal Aesthetics: Multimodality and the Haunted Mask of Knowing. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodrich, P (2014) Legal Emblems and the Art of Law: Obiter Depicta as the Vision of Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henne, K and Troshynski, E (2013) Mapping the margins of intersectionality: criminological possibilities in a transnational world. Theoretical Criminology 17, 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, S, Beckett, K and Stuart, F (2018) Policing social marginality: contrasting approaches. Law & Social Inquiry 43, 1491–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JCHR (2020) The Government's Response to COVID-19: Human Rights Implications. Seventh Report of Session 2019–21, 21 September, HC 265, HL Paper 125.Google Scholar
JCHR (2021) Care Homes: Visiting Restrictions during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Fifteenth Report of Session 2019–21, 28 April, HC 1375, HL Paper 278.Google Scholar
Laird, K (2018) Case comment. Criminal Law Review 5, 395–399.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G and Johnson, M (2003) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J (2015) Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D and Wan, M (2017) Introduction: legal marginalia. Law and Humanities 11, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, LJ (1993) Claims-making from the underside: marginalization and social problems analysis. In Miller, G and Holstein, JA (eds), Constructionist Controversies; Issues in Social Problems Theory. London: Routledge, Chapter 8.Google Scholar
Mills, E (2018) Gender, sexuality and the limits of the law. Global Discourse 8, 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, LJ (2021) Law Judges and Visual Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, L (2011) Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process and the Place of Law. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, S (2019) Silence and attunement in legal performance. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 34, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OED Online (2021) marginalize, v. Oxford University Press. June. Available at: www.oed.com/view/Entry/114048/ (accessed 4 August 2021).Google Scholar
Olson, G (2014) Narration and narrative in legal discourse. In Hühn, P et al. (eds), Handbook of Narratology. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, H and Kintrea, K (2002) Part of the problem or part of the solution? Journal of Social Policy 34, 643–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puig, S (2021) At the Margins of Globalization: Indigenous Peoples and International Economic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, S (2017) Margins of authority: Coke's Institutes and the epistemology of the string cite. Law and Humanities 11, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, M (2019) A historical exposition of spatial injustice and segregated urban settlement in South Africa. Fundamina 25, 135–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigh, H (2019) Displaced without moving: loyalism and democratic haunting in Northern Ireland. In Augusteijn, J, Hijzen, C and de Vries, ML (eds), Historical Perspectives on Democracies and Their Adversaries. London: Palgrave Springer, pp. 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, G (2015) Dress, Law and Naked Truth: A Cultural Study of Fashion and Form. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Xenophontos, G (2021) UK court rules Home Secretary failed to properly investigate deaths in immigration centers. Jurist, 15 April.Google Scholar