Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:43:58.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Giving birth but refusing motherhood: inauthentic choice or self-determining identity?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2008

Jill Marshall
Jill Marshall*
Affiliation:
Department of Law, Queen Mary, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Issues of what personal autonomy and identity means are investigated in the context of the European Court of Human Rights’ development of Article 8’s right to respect one’s private life into a right to personal autonomy, identity and integrity with particular reference to French anonymous birthing as explored by that court in Odièvre v France and feminist literature on mothering and autonomy. Although much critiqued by feminists, personal autonomy has been reconceptualised to mean something of worth to women. Yet, this version of autonomy can diverge into two directions in terms of individual identity as evidenced in Odièvre and in feminist literature: self-determination or self-realisation/authenticity. Conclusions are reached that making autonomy dependent on claims to ‘authenticity’ restricts personal freedom and thus ultimately identity.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 169 - 185
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avineri, S. and De-shalit, A. (eds) (1992) Communitarianism and Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Badinter, E. (1981) Mother Love: Myth and Reality. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Battersby, C. (1998) The Phenomenal Woman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bonnet, C. (1991) Gesture of Love. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Brockington, I. (1996) Motherhood and Mental Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. (1995) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chodorow, N. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, D. (1998) At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex and Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dally, A. (1982) Inventing Motherhood: The Consequences of an Ideal. London: Burnett Books Ltd.Google Scholar
De beauvoir, S. (1953/1997) The Second Sex. London: Jonathan Cape [1953, Vintage].Google Scholar
Diduck, A. (2003) Law’s Families. London: Butterworths LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Dilman, I. (1991) ‘Sartre and Our Identity as Individuals’ in Cockburn, D. (ed.) Human Beings, The Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, G. (1999) The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (ed.) (1988) The Essential Communitarian Reader. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Evans, M. (1997) Introducing Contemporary Feminist Thought. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Firestone, S. (1971) The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Bantham Books.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M. (1995) Feminisms and the Self: The Web of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guignon, C. (2004) On Being Authentic. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, V. (1993) Feminist Morality. London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, E. (2000) ‘Abortion, Autonomy and Prenatal Diagnosis’ Social and Legal Studies 9: 464–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, E. (2001) Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology and Autonomy. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Jackson, E. and Lacey, N. (2002) ‘Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory’, in Penner, J., Schiff, D. and Nobles, R. (eds), Jurisprudence and Legal Theory: Commentary and Materials. London: Butterworths LexisNexis, 779–853.Google Scholar
James, S. and Palmer, S. (2002) Visible Women. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1988) Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Knop, K. (ed.) (2004) Gender and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. (1998) Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Lefaucheur, N. (2000) Etude-Enfants nes sous X. Paris: CNRS – IRESCO.Google Scholar
Lefaucheur, N. (2004) ‘The French “Tradition” of Anonymous Birthing: The Lines of Argument’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 18: 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. (1984) The Man of Reason: Male and Female in Western Philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N. (eds) (2000) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinnon, C. (1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. (2008) ‘A Right to Personal Autonomy at the European Court of Human Rights’ European Human Rights Law Review 3: 336–355.Google Scholar
Mcgraw, P. (2001) Self Matters. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Mcintyre, A. (1981) After Virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Munro, V. E. (2001) ‘Surrogacy and the Construction of the Maternal–Foetal Relationship: The Feminist Dilemma Examined’, Res Publica 7: 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedelsky, J. (1989) ‘Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 7–36.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1999) Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’brien, M. (1981) The Politics of Reproduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’donovan, K. (2000) ‘ Enfants Trouves, Anonymous Mothers and Children’s Identity Rights’, in O’Donovan, K. and Rubin, G. (eds), Human Rights and Legal History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 66–85.Google Scholar
O’donovan, K. (2002) ‘“Real” mothers for abandoned children’, Law and Society Review 36: 347–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’donovan, K. and Marshall, J. (2006) ‘Afterbirth: Decisions About Becoming a Mother’, in O’Donovan, K. and Diduck, A. (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Family Law. London: Cavendish, 101–122.Google Scholar
Panter-brick, C. and Smith, M. (2000) Abandoned Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (1993) Democracy and Difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Reece, H. (2003) Divorcing Responsibly. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Regan, T. (1986) Matters of Life and Death. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Rich, A. (1976) Of Woman Born. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1982/1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheiwe, K. (2003) ‘Giving Birth Anonymously – A Suitable Export from France to Germany’, International Family Law Journal 144–150.Google Scholar
Steiner, E. (2003) ‘Odièvre v France – Desperately Seeking Mother – Anonymous Births in the European Court of Human Rights’ Child and Family Law Quarterly 15: 425–448.Google Scholar
Stumpf, A. (1986) ‘Redefining Mother: A Legal Matrix for New Reproductive Technologies’ Yale Law Journal 96: 187–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, C. (1991) The Ethics of Authenticity. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1992) ‘Atomism’, in Avineri, S. and De-Shalit, A. (eds), Communitarianism and Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29–50.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. D. (2005) ‘The Self as Narrator’ in Christman, J. and Anderson, J. (eds) Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R. (1988) ‘Jurisprudence and Gender’ University of Chicago Law Review 55: 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar