Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:51:05.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Civil Partnership to Same-Sex Marriage: Interdisciplinary Reflections Edited by Nicola Barker and Daniel Monk , Abingdon: Routledge, 2015. 245 pp. ISBN: 978-1-138-79753-6 £90.00 hardback

Review products

From Civil Partnership to Same-Sex Marriage: Interdisciplinary Reflections Edited by Nicola Barker and Daniel Monk , Abingdon: Routledge, 2015. 245 pp. ISBN: 978-1-138-79753-6 £90.00 hardback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2017

Charlotte Bendall
Charlotte Bendall*
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Essex
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 429 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harding, R. (2008) ‘Recognizing (and Resisting) Regulation: Attitudes to the Introduction of Civil Partnership’, Sexualities 11(6): 740–760.Google Scholar
Mccandless, J. and Sheldon, S. (2010) ‘The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (2008) and the Tenacity of the Sexual Family Form’, Modern Law Review 73(2): 175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, J. (2008) ‘Regulation, Resistance, Recognition’, Sexualities 11(6): 787–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C. and Boyd, S. (2006) ‘Losing the Feminist Voice? Debates on the Legal Recognition of Same Sex Partnerships in Canada’, Feminist Legal Studies 14(2): 213–240.Google Scholar