Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:46:58.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examining the biological bases of family law: lessons to be learned for the evolutionary analysis of law∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2007

June Carbone  and
Naomi Cahn
June Carbone
Affiliation:
Edward A. Smith/Missouri Professor of Law, the Constitution and Society, University of Missouri-Kansas City
Naomi Cahn
Affiliation:
John Theodore Fey Research Professor of Law, George Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article critically examines the insights that biology (including evolutionary analysis and neuroscience data) offers for understanding the relationship between family law and family stability. The paper initially considers evolutionary analysis, comparative anatomy, and neuroscience data to conclude that while the pair bond appears to be a universal feature of human societies, long-term fidelity is not. The second part of the paper considers the benefits and limitations of evolutionary analysis concluding, first, that evolutionary analysis, without connection to modern neuroscience or sociological data, remains highly speculative; second, that where the evolutionary analysis is borne out by modern neuroscience and/or sociological data, it is more persuasive, but often leads to obvious conclusions; and third, that undertaking this type of examination nonetheless leads to new insights or new questions that should prompt productive research.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 277 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buss, David M. (2004) Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Carbone, June (2000) From Partners to Parents. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Carbone, June and Cahn, Naomi (2003) ‘Which Ties Bind? Redefining the Parent-Child Relationship in an Age of Genetic Certainty’, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 11: 1011.Google Scholar
Carbone, June and Cahn, Naomi (2004) ‘The Biological Basis of Commitment: Does One Size Fit All?’ Women’s Rights Law Reporter 25: 223.Google Scholar
Coontz, Stephanie (2005) Marriage, a History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1839) Voyage of the Beagle available online at http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/charles_darwin/voyage_of_beagle/Chapter17.html.Google Scholar
De Waal, Frans B. M. (2001) ‘Apes from Venus: Bonobos and Human Social Evolution’ in de Waal, Frans B. M. (ed.) Tree of Origin: What Primate Behavior Can Tell Us About Human Social Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Jared M. (1997) Why is Sex Fun? The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Engels, Frederick (1891/1964) The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Fields, Jason and Casper, Lynne (U.S. Census Bureau) (2001) ‘America’s Families and Living Arrangements: Population Characteristics’, Current Population Reports.Google Scholar
Fisher, Helen E. (1982) The Sex Contract: The Evolution of Human Behavior. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Fisher, Helen (1992) Anatomy of Love: The Natural History of Monogamy, Adultery, and Divorce. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Fisher, Helen (2004) Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Kristen et al. (2001) ‘Reply’, Current Anthropology 42: 702, 704.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Kristen (2003) ‘Grandmothers and the Evolution of Human Longevity’, American Journal of Human Biology 15: 380, 382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer (1999) Mother Nature: Maternal Instincts and How They Shape the Human Species. New York: Ballantine Publishing Group, pp. 228–9.Google Scholar
Johnson, Steven (2004) Mind Wide Open: Your Brain and the Neuroscience of Everyday Life. New York: Scribner, p. 111.Google Scholar
Jones, Owen (2001) ‘Evolutionary Analysis In Law: Some Objections Considered’, Brooklyn Law Review 67: 207.Google Scholar
Jones, Owen D. and Goldsmith, Timothy H. (2005) ‘Law And Behavioral Biology’, Columbia Law Review 105: 405Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter and Hall, Richard (eds.) (1972) Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurence, Leslie (2004) ‘His and Her Stress’, Ladies Home Journal, May, pp. 141, 147.Google Scholar
Lewin, Roger (1998) Principles of Human Evolution. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science Publishing.Google Scholar
Miller, Geoffrey (2000) The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Nestler, Eric J. and Malenka, Robert C. (2004) ‘The Addicted Brain’, Scientific American 78: available from http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&articleID=0001E632-978A-1019-978A83414B7F0101&pageNumber=2&catID=2.Google Scholar
Patterson, Orlando (1999) Rituals of Blood: Consequences of Slavery in Two American Centuries. New York: Civitas.Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood (2001) Adolescent Sexuality [Internet], available at http://www.plannedparenthood.org/library/sexuality/AdolescSexual.html.Google Scholar
Pope, Stephen J. (2005) ‘Sex, Marriage and Family Life: The Teachings of Nature’, in Tipton, Steven M. and Witte, John Jr. (eds.) Family Transformed: Religion, Values, and Society in American Life, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Reno, Phillip L. et al. (2003) ‘Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [Internet], 5 August 2003, 100(16), 9404–9409. Available at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/100/16/9404?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Reno &searchid=1099865503006 3821&stored search=&FIRST INDEX=0 (last accessed 24 March 2005).Google Scholar
Ridley, Matt (1993) The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ridley, Matt (2003) Nature via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes Us Human. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Shorter, Edward (1975) The Making of the Modern Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence (1977) The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Smuts, Barbara B. and Smuts, Robert W. (1993) ‘Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primate and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications’, in Slater, Peter J. B. et al. (eds.) Advances in the Study of Human Behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M. (1981) ‘Menarcheal Age’, Science 214: 604 [letter].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, Robert L. (1972) ‘Parental Investment and Sexual Selection’ in Campbell, Bernard (ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Van Schaik, Carel and Dunbar, Robin (1990) ‘The Evolution of Monogamy in Large Primates: A New Hypothesis and Some Crucial Tests’, Behavior 115: 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrangham, Richard (2001) ‘Out of the Pan, Into the Fire: How our Ancestors’ Evolution Depended on What they Ate’ in de Waal, Frans B. M. (ed) Tree of Origin: What Primate Behavior Can Tell Us About Human Social Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
wyshak, G. and frisch, R. E. (1982) ‘Evidence for a Secular Trend in the Age of Menarche’, New England Journal of Medicine 305: 1033–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar