Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:01:32.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The criminalisation of symbols of the past: expression, law and memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Agata Fijalkowski
Agata Fijalkowski*
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Law at Lancaster University Law School, UK. Email: [email protected].
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the criminalisation of symbols of the past. It considers the 2011 judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. In this compact and well-ordered decision, the Tribunal, with reference to key European examples, assessed critically the constitutionality of criminal law provisions that prohibit the dissemination and public use of symbols of the past pertaining to fascist, Communist or other totalitarian content. Its ruling, which found amendments to the law in Poland that tightened up restrictions on the use of totalitarian symbols to be unconstitutional, is considered within three important contexts: first, the broad European context, where the concept of totalitarian crimes has become subject to EU human rights legislation relating to the freedom of expression; second, the context of post-dictatorial Europe, where specific states have addressed the use of totalitarian symbols in their respective criminal laws; and finally, the context of transitional justice, where criminalising symbols of the past has become a central and permanent feature in European narratives about justice. Significantly, these cases reveal the temporal element of transitional justice. The paper discusses the two case-studies most relevant to Poland, namely those in Germany and Hungary. Reference is also made to the Baltic States, which, together with Poland, have made a concerted effort to bring the notion of totalitarian crimes and histories to the attention of Europe. The paper concurs with the contention that cases concerning the use of symbols provide an excellent illustration of where memory and law intersect. Using historical, comparative and contextual methodologies the paper demonstrates the legal and philosophical complexities of criminal uses of symbolism, the political realities, and the key dimension of transitional justice and its relationship to expression, law and memory.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 295 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, Hugh (1937) ‘Petrazhitskii: Science of Legal Policy and Theory of Law’, Harvard Law Review 37: 793–829.Google Scholar
Babb, Hugh (1938) ‘Petrazhitskii: Theory of Law’, Harvard Law Review 38: 511–578.Google Scholar
Belavusau, Ulazdzislau (2013) ‘Historical Revisionism in Comparative Perspective: Law, Politics, and Surrogate Mourning’, EUI Working Paper LAW 2013/12.Google Scholar
Buyse, Antoine (2011) ‘The Truth, the Past and the Present: Article 10 ECHR and Situations of Transition’, in Buyse, Antoine and Hamilton, Michael (eds), Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice, Politics, and Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131–150.Google Scholar
Buyse, Antoine and Hamilton, Michael (eds) (2011) Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice, Politics, and Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Courtois, Stéphane, Werth, Nicholas, Panné, Jean-Louis, Bartošek, Karel and Margolin, Jean-Louis (1999) The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror Repression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
David, Roman (2011) Lustration and Transitional Justice: Personnel Systems in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Norman (1982) God's Playground: A History of Poland, Volume II: 1795 to the Present. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, Catherine (2007) ‘Law Importation and Cultural Transformations in Post-Communist Transitions’, in Jakab, A., Tákacs, P. and Tatham, A. (eds), Transformation of the Hungarian Legal Order, 1985–2005. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 88–102.Google Scholar
Etkind, Aleksander, Finnin, Rory, Blacker, Uilleam, Fedor, Julie, Lewis, Simon, Mälksoo, Maria and Mroz, Matilda (eds) (2012) Remembering Katyn. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Fijalkowski, Agata (2010) From Old Times to New Europe. Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fronza, Emanuela (2006) ‘The Punishment of Negationism: The Difficult Dialogue between Law and Memory’, Vermont Law Review 30: 609–626.Google Scholar
Garton Ash, Timothy (1983) The Polish Revolution: Solidarity. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra (2013) ‘Stalinism and Communism Equals or Versus Nazism? Central and Eastern European Unwholesome Legacy in ECtHR’, paper delivered at Legal Frames of Memory: Transitional Justice in Central and Eastern Europe, 27−29 November 2013, Warsaw, Poland, on file with author.Google Scholar
Grosescu, Raluca and Fijalkowski, Agata (eds) (forthcoming) Transitional Criminal Justice in Post-Dictatorial and Post-Conflict States. Cambridge, Antwerp and London: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Janis, Mark W., Kay, Richard S. and Bradley, Anthony W. (2008) European Human Rights Law: Text and Materials, 3rd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koltay, András (13 February 2013) ‘The Red Star in Europe: the Vajnai Case before the European Court of Human Rights’. Available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2216661> or <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2216661> (last accessed 2 January 2014).+or++(last+accessed+2+January+2014).>Google Scholar
Kosař, David (2008) ‘Lustration and Lapse of Time: “Dealing with the Past” in the Czech Republic’, European Constitutional Law Review 4: 460–487.Google Scholar
Lepka, Iwona (2009) ‘Freedom of Expression in Post-Communist Poland’, Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory 37: 619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mälskoo, Maria (2008) ‘The Discourse of Communist Crimes in the European Memory Politics of World War II’, paper presented at the Ideology and Discourse Analysis Conference, Rethinking Political Frontiers and Democracy in a New World Order, Roskilde University, Denmark, 8–10 September 2008, on file with author.Google Scholar
Přibáň, Jiří (2007) Legal Symbolism: On Law, Time and European Identity. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Püschel, Hannes (2013) ‘Coming to Terms with the Past through Penal Law? Denial of Historical Atrocities in (Central and Eastern) European Penal Law’, paper delivered at Legal Frames of Memory: Transitional Justice in Central and Eastern Europe, 27−29 November 2013, Warsaw, Poland, on file with author.Google Scholar
Quint, Peter E. (1997) Imperfect Union: Constitutional Structures of German Unification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Quint, Peter E. (1999) ‘Judging the Past: The Prosecution of East German Border Guards and the GDR Chain of Command’, Review of Politics 61: 303–329.Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech (2005) Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Sajó, András (1999) ‘Reading the Invisible Constitution: Judicial Review in Hungary’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15: 253–267.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane (2006) ‘Guardian of the Constitution: Constitutional Court Presidents and the Struggle for the Rule of Law in Post-Soviet Europe’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154: 1757–1851.Google Scholar
Sottiaux, Stefan (2008) Terrorism and the Limitation of Rights: The ECHR and the US Constitution. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Snyder, Timothy (2010) Bloodlands: Europe between Stalin and Hitler. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Stegbauer, Andreas (2007) ‘The Ban of Right-wing Extremist Symbols according to Section 86a of the German Criminal Code’, German Law Journal 8: 173–184.Google Scholar
Sweeney, James A. (2011) ‘Freedom of Religion and Democratic Transition’, in Buyse, Antoine and Hamilton, Michael (eds), Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice, Politics, and Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–130.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. (2000) Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. (2003) ‘Transitional Justice Genealogy’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 69–94.Google Scholar
Žalimas, Dainius (forthcoming) ‘International and National Legal Assessment of Crimes Committed by the Communist Regimes (Lithuanian Case Study)’, in Grosescu, Raluca and Fijalkowski, Agata (eds), Transitional Criminal Justice in Post-Dictatorial and Post-Conflict States. Cambridge, Antwerp and London: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Zamoyski, Adam (2009) Poland: A History. London: Harper.Google Scholar
Žilinskas, Justinas (2012) ‘Introduction of “Crime of Denial” in the Lithuanian Criminal Law and First Instances of its Application’, Jurisprudencja/Jurispridence 19: 315–329.Google Scholar