Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:25:56.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Controlling the ‘Gorgon’ of state power in the state of exception: a reply to Professor Tushnet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2008

Colm O’Cinneide*
Affiliation:
University College London1

Abstract

Mark Tushnet’s paper is an interesting extension of his recent work on how constitutional democracies can control the use of emergency powers. His analysis is useful in drawing attention to the often-overlooked impact of political dynamics in times of emergency. However, Tushnet is too ready to accept that political processes will be able to control the grant and use of emergency powers. He also is too quick to draw a sharp dichotomy between effective political and ineffective legal processes. Political processes can be active and useful in reining in the excesses of emergency powers, but usually only if they play out against the backdrop of a vibrant constitutional culture where the potential for abuse of emergency powers is recognised. The impact of legal and supranational controls plays an important role in shaping this constitutional culture, in particular by ‘dampening’ down the abuse of emergency powers and limiting the scope of action available to the executive. Focusing upon the potential of political means alone to control the application of state power in emergency states of exception is to underestimate the capacity of wider constitutional dynamics to play a key role, even if the political arena may be where the ultimate battles are fought out.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B. (2004) ‘The Emergency Constitution’, Yale Law Journal 113: 1029–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, G. (2005) State of Exception, trans. Attell, Kevin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arbour, L. (2006) ‘In Our Name and on Our Behalf’, European Human Rights Law Review (4): 371–85.Google Scholar
Boyle, K. Hadden, T. and Hillyard, P. (1980) Ten Years On in Northern Ireland: The Legal Control of Political Violence, London: Cobden Trust.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. and Connolly, I. (2006) ‘Making War on Terror? Global Lessons from Northern Ireland’, Modern Law Review 69: 935–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanaugh, K. (2006) ‘Policing the Margins: Rights Protection and the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (4): 422–44.Google Scholar
Cole, D. (2004) ‘Judging the Next Emergency: Judicial Review and Individual Rights in Times of Crisis’, Michigan Law Review 101(8): 2564–94.Google Scholar
Donohue, L. K. (2000) Emergency Powers and Counter-terrorist Law in the United Kingdom 1922-2000. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2004) ‘Intimations of Legality Amid the Clash of Arms’, International Journal of Comparative Constitutional Law 2(2): 244–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, K. D. (2004) ‘The Futility of the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, 829852.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. (2006) ‘Human Rights, Terrorism and Risk: The Roles of Politicians and Judges’, Public Law, 364–84.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J. (2003) ‘Speaking Law to Power: The War Against Terrorism and Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law 14(2): 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearty, C. (2005) ‘Human Rights in an Age of Counter-Terrorism: Injurious, Irrelevant or Indispensable?’, Current Legal Problems 58: 2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearty, C. (2007) ‘Rethinking Civil Liberties in a Counter-Terrorism World’, European Human Rights Law Review (2): 111–19.Google Scholar
Gross, O. (1998) ‘“Once More Unto the Breach”: The Systematic Failure of Applying the ECHR to Entrenched Emergencies’, Yale Journal of International Law 23(2): 437501.Google Scholar
Gross, O. (2000) ‘The Normless and Exceptionless Exception: Carl Schmitt’s Theory of Emergency Powers and the “Norm-Exception” Dichotomy’, Cardozo Law Review 21: 1825–68.Google Scholar
Gross, O. (2003) ‘Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises always be Constitutional?’, Yale Law Journal 112: 1011–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, O. and NÍ aolÁin, F. (2006) Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiebert, J. (2005) ‘Interpreting a Bill of Rights: The Importance of Legislative Rights Review’, British Journal of Political Science 35: 235–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, G. and Walker, C. (1989) Political Violence and the Law in Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lepsius, O. (2006) ‘Human Dignity and the Downing of Aircraft’, German Law Journal 7(9): 761–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loader, I. and Walker, N. (2007) Civilising Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, J. H. (2006) ‘9/11+3/11+7/7=? What Counts in Counterterrorism?’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 37(3): 559.Google Scholar
Marks, S. (1995) ‘Civil Liberties at the Margin: The UK Derogation and the ECHR’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15(1): 6995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NÍ aolÁin, F. (2000) The Politics of Force: Conflict Management and State Violence in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Blackstaff Press.Google Scholar
O’cinneide, C. (2004) ‘Democracy and Rights: New Directions in the Human Rights Act Era’, Current Legal Problems, 57: 175211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’connor, M. and Rumann, C. (2005) ‘Into the Fire: How to Avoid Getting Burned by the Same Mistakes Made Fighting Terrorism in Northern Ireland’, Cardozo Law Review 24: 16571751.Google Scholar
Phillipson, G. P. (2007) ‘Deference, Discretion and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’, Current Legal Problems 60, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. (2006) Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in Times of Emergency. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, I. Mackeith, J. Davison, S. Kopelman, M. Meux, C. Ratnam, S. Somekh, D. and Taylor, R. (2005) ‘Psychiatric Problems of Detainees under the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001’, Psychiatric Bulletin 29: 407409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safferling, C. (2006) ‘Terror and Law: German Responses to 9/11’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 4(5): 1152–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajo, A. (ed.) (2004) Militant Democracy. Amsterdam: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
Schepple, K. L. (2004) ‘Other People’s Patriot Acts: Europe’s Response to September 11’, Loyola Law Review 50: 89148.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1932/2003) Legality and Legitimacy, trans. Seitzer, Jeffrey. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E. (2006) ‘Emergency Powers and the Rule of Law After 9/11’, Journal of Political Philosophy 14(1): 6184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyn, Lord (2006) ‘Democracy, the Rule of Law and the Role of Judges’, European Human Rights Law Review 3: 243–53.Google Scholar
Tierney, S. (2006) ‘Determining the State of Exception: What Role for Parliament and the Courts?’, Modern Law Review 68(4): 668–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2003) ‘Defending Korematsu? Reflections on Civil Liberties in Wartime’, Wisconsin Law Review, 273307.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2005) ‘Controlling Executive Power in the War on Terrorism’, Harvard Law Review 118: 2673–82.Google Scholar
Walker, C. (2007) ‘The Treatment of Foreign Terror Suspects’, Modern Law Review 70(3): 427–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, D. (1983) The Use and Abuse of Emergency Legislation in Northern Ireland. London: Cobden Trust.Google Scholar
Zedner, L. (2007) ‘Preventive Justice or Pre-Punishment? The Case of Control Orders’, Current Legal Problems, 60: 174203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar