Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:30:16.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The continuing implications of the ‘crime’ of suicide: a brief history of the present

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2016

Gordon Tait*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, School of Cultural and Professional Learning, Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology. Email: [email protected]
Belinda Carpenter
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Justice, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The long history of suicide as a criminal offence still has a significant contemporary effect on how it is perceived, conceptualised and adjudged. This is particularly the case within countries where suicide is largely determined within a coronial system, such as Australia, the UK and the US. This paper details the outcomes of a study involving semi-structured interviews with coroners both in England and Australia, as well as observations at inquests. It focuses around the widely held contention that the suicide rates produced within these coronial systems are underestimations of anywhere between 15 to 50 per cent. The results of these interviews suggest that there are three main reasons for this systemic underestimation. The first reflects the legacy of suicide as a criminal offence, resulting in the highest standard of proof for findings of suicide in the UK, and a continuing stigma attached to families of the deceased. The second is the considerable pressure brought to bear upon coroners by the family of the deceased, who, because of that stigma, commonly agitate for any finding other than that of suicide. The third involves the rise of ‘therapeutic jurisprudence’, wherein coroners take on the responsibility of the emotional well-being of the grieving families, which in turn affects the likelihood of reaching a finding of suicide. The conclusions drawn by the paper are also twofold: first – with respect to the stigma of suicide – it will take a lot more than simple decriminalisation to change deeply held social perceptions within the community. Second, given that suicide prevention programmes and policies are based on such deeply questionable statistics, targeted changes to coronial legislation and practice would appear to be required.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, A. (1981) ‘The background.’ In Pabst-Battin, M. and Mayo, D. (eds), Suicide: The Philosophical Issues. London: Peter Owen, 732.Google Scholar
BBC (2007) ‘One in Ten Attends Church Weekly.’ Online: <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6520463.stm>..>Google Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burney, I. (2000) Bodies of Evidence: Medicine and the Politics of the English Inquest 1830–1926. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, B. and Tait, G. (2010) ‘The Autopsy Imperative: Medicine, Law and the Coronial Investigation’, Journal of Medical Humanities 31(3): 205221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, R., Hawton, K., Kapur, N., Bennewith, O. and Gunnell, D. (2012) ‘Impact of Growing Use of Narrative Verdicts by Coroners on Geographic Variations in Suicide: Analysis of Coroners’ Inquest Data’, Journal of Public Health 34(3): 447453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cholbi, M. (2007) ‘Self-manslaughter and the Forensic Classification of Self-inflicted Death’, Journal of Medical Ethics 33: 155157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Leo, D. (2007) ‘Suicide Mortality Data Needs Revision’, Medical Journal of Australia 186(3): 157158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leo, D., Dudley, M., Aebersold, C., Mendoza, J., Barnes, M., Harrison, J. and Ranson, D. (2010) ‘Achieving Standardised Reporting of Suicide in Australia: Rationale and Program for Change’, Medical Journal of Australia 192(8): 452456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, M. (1994) Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault's Methods and Historical Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (2002 [1897]) Suicide. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairburn, G. (1995). Contemplating Suicide: The Language and Ethics of Self-harm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984) ‘The Politics of Health in the Eighteenth Century.’ In Rabinow, P. (ed.), The Foucault Reader. London: Penguin, 273290.Google Scholar
Freckelton, I. (2008) ‘Therapeutic Jurisprudence Misunderstood and Misrepresented: The Price and Risks of Influence’, Thomas Jefferson Law Review 30(2): 575595.Google Scholar
Green, J. (1992) ‘The Medico-legal Production of Fatal Accidents’, Sociology of Health and Illness 14: 373389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J., Abou Elnour, A. and Pointer, S. (2009) A Review of Suicide Statistics in Australia, Cat. No. INJCAT 121. Canberra: AIHW. Online: <http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468269>.Google Scholar
King, M. (2008) ‘Non-adversarial Justice and the Coroner's Court: A Proposed Therapeutic, Restorative, Problem-solving Model’, Journal of Law and Medicine 442: 442457.Google Scholar
King, M. (2011) ‘Therapeutic Jurisprudence's Challenge to the Judiciary’, Alaska Journal of Dispute Resolution 1: 120.Google Scholar
Linsley, K., Schapira, K. and Kelly, T. (2001) ‘Open Verdict v. Suicide – Importance to Research’, British Journal of Psychiatry 178: 465468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, I. (2010) Suicide: Foucault, History and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mccrindle, M. (2013) ‘Church Attendance in Australia.’ McCrindle Forecasts. Online: <http://www.mccrindle.com.au/the-mccrindle-blog/church_attendance_in_australia_infographic>..>Google Scholar
Neeleman, J. (1996) ‘Suicide as a Crime in the UK: Legal History, International Comparisons and Present Implications’, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 94: 252257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolheiser, R. (2015) ‘The Stigma of Suicide’, The Irish Catholic, 15 October. Online: <www.irishcatholic/article/stigma-suicide>..>Google Scholar
Sands, D. and North, J. (2014) ‘Family Therapy following Suicide.’ In Kissane, D. and Parnes, F. (eds), Bereavement Care for Families. New York: Routledge, 154170.Google Scholar
Schneidman, E. (1985) Definition of Suicide. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee (2010) The Hidden Toll: Suicide in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Tait, G. (2010) Philosophy, Behaviour Disorders and the School. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, G. and Carpenter, B. (2013) ‘Suicide and the Therapeutic Coroner: Inquests, Governance and the Grieving Family’, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 2(3): 92104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, G., Carpenter, B., De Leo, D. and Tatz, C. (2015) ‘Problems with the Coronial Determination of Suicide’, Mortality 20(3): 233247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, S., Chen, L. and Madden, R. (2008) ‘Deaths Due to Suicide: The Effects of Certification and Coding Practices in Australia’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 32(2): 126130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wexler, D. (1992) ‘Putting Mental Health into Mental Health Law’, Law and Human Behaviour 16(2): 2738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, D. (2012) ‘New Wine in New Bottles: The Need to Sketch a Therapeutic Jurisprudence “Code” of Proposed Criminal Processes and Practices’, Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 12–16.Google Scholar
Windt, P. (1981) ‘The Concept of Suicide.’ In Pabst-Battin, M. and Mayo, D. (eds), Suicide: The Philosophical Issues. London: Peter Owen, 3947.Google Scholar