We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Dagan, H (2005) Property at a Crossroads. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press.Google Scholar
Dagan, H (2011) Property: Values and Institutions. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, H (2015) Expropriatory compensation, the rule of law, and distributive justice. In Björn, Hoops, et al. (eds), Rethinking Law I: Public Interest in Expropriation. Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, pp. 329–346.Google Scholar
Dagan, H (2018a) Eminent domain and regulatory takings: towards a unified theory. In Hoops, Björn et al. (eds), Rethinking Law III: Fair Compensation. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, pp. 21–41.Google Scholar
Dagan, H (2018b) The real legacy of American legal realism. Oxford Journal of Law Studies38, 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, H (2021a) A Liberal Theory of Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, H and Dorfman, A (2016) Just relationships. Columbia Law Review116, 1395.Google Scholar
Dagan, H and Heller, M (2001) The liberal commons. Yale Law Journal110, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, H and Heller, M (2020) Choice theory: a restatement. In Dagan, H and Zipursky, B (eds), Research Handbook on Private Law Theory. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, H and Heller, M (2022) Can contract emancipate? Contract theory and the law of work. Theoretical Inquiries in Law23.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. London: G. Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dyal-Chand, R (2018) Collaborative Capitalism in American Cities: Reforming Urban Market Regulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, DC (2021) Embedded property. In Lippert RK and Treffers S (eds), Condominium Governance and Law: Global Urban Perspectives, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimel, D (2003) From Promise to Contract: Towards a Liberal Theory of Contract. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Kramer, MH (2017) Liberalism with Excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J (1689) The Second Treatise of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Peter Laslett ed. 1988).Google Scholar
Munzer, SR (1990) A Theory of Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, EA and Weyl, EG (2018) Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sherry, C (2020) Does discrimination law apply to residential strata schemes? University of New South Wales Law Journal43, 307–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Walt, AJ (2011) Constitutional Property Law, 3rd edn. Cape Town: Juta Law.Google Scholar
Vriens, E and De, Moor T (2020) Mutuals on the move: exclusion processes in the welfare state and the rediscovery of mutualism. Social Inclusion8, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, R (2021) Property Rights and Social Justice: Progressive Property in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, K (2022) Crucial options: Dagan on self-determination and structural pluralism. King's Law Journal33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar