No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Role of Judicial Associations in Resisting Rule of Law Backsliding: Hidden Pathways of Protecting Judicial Independence Amidst Rule of Law Decay
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 September 2024
Abstract
Both Hungary and Poland have been in the spotlight regarding their democratic backsliding, with Executives exerting control over supposedly independent pillars of democracy, such as courts or the media. While the concerns about these countries also voiced by leaders of European institutions were similar, the resistance against the systematic erosion of judicial independence comes in different forms. Using comparative longitudinal case study methodology, this article shows that a defining characteristic in the potential, visibility and feasibility of what judges did or could do under the current threats depends on the role judicial associations, understood as representative collegial judicial bodies. More precisely, the format, organisation and operative tools of judicial associations contribute to their influence on prior judicial reforms and their capacity to withstand ongoing efforts in curtailing their independence from political actors. Empirically, the article reviews multiple judicial changes in the 1992–2015 period in both countries and assesses how judicial associations then shaped the divergent responses to recent attempts at limiting judicial independence. The differences in the legal framework, organisation and network reliance explains variance in resistance. Overall, the article broadens the theoretical and empirical framework for studying the role of courts and judges with considerations regarding professional association organisation and co-ordination, as a potential layer of studying judicial resistance.
- Type
- Special Issue Article
- Information
- International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 20 , Special Issue 2: Facets of Rule of Law Backsliding , June 2024 , pp. 166 - 183
- Copyright
- © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Footnotes
*
This research is connected to the Judges under Stress – The Breaking Point of Judicial Institutions Project. The project was financed by the FRIPRO program of the Norwegian Research Council and the University of Oslo (2019–2022).
References
Bárd, P (2019) ‘Am I Independent?’ A Hungarian Judge Asks the CJEU in a Struggle against Judicial Capture, Reconnect. Available at: https://reconnect-europe.eu/blog/politics-newep-krum-2/.Google Scholar
Bárd, P (2021) The Sanctity of Preliminary References: An analysis of the CJEU decision C-564/19 IS, VerfBlog, 26 November. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/the-sanctity-of-preliminary-references/.Google Scholar
Belavusau, U (2013) On age discrimination and beating dead dogs: Commission v. Hungary, Common Market Law Review 50.Google Scholar
Bell, DA (1994) Lawyers and Citizens: The Making of a Political Elite in Old Regime France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bencze, M (2021) Judicial Populism and the Weberian Judge – The Strength of Judicial Resistance Against Governmental Influence in Hungary, German Law Journal 22(7), 1282–1297.Google Scholar
Egyesülete, Bírónők. Available at: https://unicef.hu/ezt-tesszuk-itthon/szakmai-partnereink/bironok-egyesulete.Google Scholar
Bojarski, Ł (2021) Civil Society Organisations for and with the Courts and Judges – Struggle for the Rule of Law and Judicial Independence: The Case of Poland 1976-2020. In Graver HP and Curos P (eds), Special Issue: ‘Judges under Stress: Understanding Continuity and Discontinuity of Judicial Institutions of the CEE countries’, German Law Journal 22(7).Google Scholar
Bojarski, Ł (2023) ‘Judicial Resistance against the Rule of Law Backsliding—Judges and Citizens—the case of Poland’, PhD Thesis, University of Oslo. Available at: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/105831/PhD-Bojarski-2023.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
Bolleyer, N (2021) Civil society, crisis exposure and resistance strategies. In Sajó, A Uitz, R and Holmes, S (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonelli, M and Claes, M (2018) Judicial Serendipity: How Portuguese judges came to the rescue of the Polish Judiciary, European Constitutional Law Review 3, 14.Google Scholar
Caserta, S and Cebulak, P (2021) Resiliency Techniques of International Courts in Times of Resistance to International Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 70(3), 737–768.Google Scholar
Consultative Council of European Judges (2024) CCJE Opinion No. 23 (2020) The role of associations of judges in supporting judicial independence. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/opinion-23-en-ccje-2020/1680a03d4b.Google Scholar
Court of Justice of the European Union, C-286/12 Commission v. Hungary of 6 November 2012. ECLI:EU:C:2012:687.Google Scholar
Court of Justice of the European Union, C-564/18 LH. ECLI:EU:C:2020:218.Google Scholar
Court of Justice of the European Union, C-564/19 IS. ECLI:EU:C:2021:949.Google Scholar
Drinóczi T and Bień-Kacała A (2022) Illiberal Constitutionalism in Poland and Hungary: The Deterioration of Democracy, Misuse of Human Rights and Abuse of the Rule of Law. Routledge.Google Scholar
Eötvös Károly Institute (2020) Judicial Independence and the Possibility of Judicial Resistance in Hungary. Available at: https://ekint.org/lib/documents/1612860445-EKINT_Judicial_Independence_and_the_Possibility_of_Judicial_Resistance_in_Hungary.pdf.Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights, Baka v. Hungary Application No 20261/12, Merits and Just Satisfaction, 23 June 2016.Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights, Notification of 37 cases concerning judicial independence in Poland. Available at: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press#{%22fulltext%22:[%22Notification%20of%2037%20applications%20concerning%20judicial%20independence%20in%20Poland%22]}.Google Scholar
European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (2024) Members. Available at: https://birosag.hu/en/balkan-and-euro-mediterranean-network-councils-judiciary.Google Scholar
Feeley, M (2012) Judges and company: courts, constitutionalism and the legal complex. In Halliday, TC, Karpik, L and Feeley, MM (eds), Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, M and Langford, M (eds) (2021). The Limits of the Legal Complex: Nordic Lawyers and Political Liberalism. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleck, Z (2021) Changes of the Political and Legal System: Judicial Autonomy. In Graver HP and Curos P (eds), Special Issue: ‘Judges under Stress: Understanding Continuity and Discontinuity of Judicial Institutions of the CEE countries’. German Law Journal 22(7).Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T and Moustafa, T (2008) Rule by Law. The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graver, HP (2015) Judges Against Justice: On Judges When the Rule of Law is Under Attack. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Graver, HP (2018) Judicial Independence Under Authoritarian Rule: An Institutional Approach to the Legal Tradition of the West, Hague Journal of Rule of Law 10, 317–339.Google Scholar
Graver, HP (2024) Valiant Judges, Iniquitous Law Thirteen Stories of Heroes of the Law. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graver, HP and Čuroš, P (2021) Judges Under Stress: Understanding Continuity and Discontinuity of Judicial Institutions of the CEE Countries, German Law Journal 22, 1147–1158.Google Scholar
Gyöngyi, P (2019) Judicial Reforms in Hungary and Romania: The challenging implementation of EU rule of law standards. PhD Dissertation. Erasmus University. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Halliday, TC (2013) Why the Legal Complex is Integral to Theories of Consequential Courts. In Kapiszewski, D, Silverstein, G and Kagan, RA (eds), Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337–348.Google Scholar
Halliday, TC (2019) The International Legal Complex: Wang Yu and the Global Response to Repression of China’s Rights’ Lawyers. In Greenspan, R, Aviram, H and Simon, J (eds), The Legal Process and the Possibility of Justice: Research in the Tradition of Malcolm Feeley. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 289–313.Google Scholar
Halliday, TC (2023) ‘Judges Under Stress: Legal Complexes and a Sociology of Hope’, Keynote Address presented at the conference on Judges under Stress – The Breaking Point of Judicial Institutions, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, 17–18 November 2022. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4482114
Google Scholar
Halliday, TC and Karpik, L (eds) (1997) Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism: Europe and North America from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, TC, Karpik, L and Feeley, M (eds) (2007) Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Hungarian Helsinki Committee (2020) The New President of the Kúria. A potential transmission belt of the Executive within the Hungarian Judicary, 22 October 2020. Available at: https://helsinki.hu/wp-content/uploads/The_New_President_of_the_Kuria_20201022.pdf.Google Scholar
Hungarian Helsinki Committee (2021) The Council of Europe is Loosing its Patience in the Baka Ccase, 20 Spetembe 2021. Available at: https://helsinki.hu/en/the-council-of-europe-is-losing-its-patience-in-the-baka-case/.Google Scholar
Hungarian Helsinki Committee (2022) Another Scandal at the Judiciary: no effective remedy for judges dismissed from the bench, 12 September 2022. Available at: https://helsinki.hu/en/another-scandal-at-the-judiciary-no-effective-remedy-for-judges-dismissed-from-the-bench/.Google Scholar
Hungarian Helsinki Committee, Amnesty International (2019) A Constitutional Crisis in the Hungarian Judiciary. Available at: https://helsinki.hu/wp-content/uploads/A-Constitutional-Crisis-in-the-Hungarian-Judiciary-09072019.pdf.Google Scholar
International Association of Judges (2024) Member Associations. Available at: https://www.iaj-uim.org/iuw/member-associations.Google Scholar
Karpik, L (1997) Builders of Liberal Society: French Lawyers and Politics. In Halliday, TC and Karpik, L (eds), Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism: Europe and North America from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 101–123.Google Scholar
Karpik, L and Halliday, TC (2011) The Legal Complex. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7, 217–236.Google Scholar
Kelemen, RD (2023) The European Union’s failure to address the autocracy crisis: MacGyver, Rube Goldberg, and Europe’s unused tools. Journal of European Integration 45(2), 223–238.Google Scholar
Kochenov, D and Pech, L (2015) Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the EU: Rhetoric and Reality. European Constitutional Law Review 11(3), 512–540.Google Scholar
Kovács, K and Scheppele, KL (2019) The fragility of an independent judiciary: Lessons from Hungary and Poland – and the European Union. Communist and Post-communist Studies 51(3), 189–200.Google Scholar
MABIE (1992), Bírák Lapja 1992. Available at: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B-614PucubcBendNcXI2OEtWaUU?resourcekey=0-gbRSILKtyzToAgOSdDTdoQ
Google Scholar
MABIE (2017) Szervezet (Organisational Structure). Available at: https://www.mabie.hu/index.php/szervezet.Google Scholar
MABIE (2020) Megemlékezés a Magyar Bírói Egyesület 30 éves évfordulójáról. Available at: https://www.mabie.hu/attachments/article/1571/Jubileumi%20kiadv%C3%A1ny%20bemutat%C3%A1sa%20-%20az%20eleje.pdf.Google Scholar
MABIE (2020a) Alapszabály. Available at: https://www.mabie.hu/attachments/article/3/MABIE_ALAPSZABALY_2020.pdf.Google Scholar
MABIE (2020b) Dr. Vadász Viktor: A bírói függetlenség Magyarországon az Európai Unió Bíróságának C 791/19 R számú döntése fényében. Available at: https://www.mabie.hu/index.php/1536-dr-vadasz-viktor-a-biroi-fuggetlenseg-magyarorszagon-az-europai-unio-birosaganak-c-791-19-r-szamu-dontese-fenyeben.Google Scholar
MABIE (2021) Jogellenesen akadályozta egy bíró áthelyezését Handó Tünde. Available at: https://www.mabie.hu/index.php/1560-jogellenesen-akadalyozta-egy-biro-athelyezeset-hando-tunde.Google Scholar
Madsen, M, Cebulak, P and Weibusch, M (2018) Backlash against International Courts: Explaining the Forms and Patterns of Resistance to International Courts. International Journal of Law in Context 14(2), 197–220.Google Scholar
Matthes, C-Y (2022) Judges as activists: how Polish judges mobilise to defend the rule of law. East European Politics 38(3) 468–487.Google Scholar
Mayoral, JA, Jaremba, U and Nowak, T (2014) Creating EU law judges: the role of generational differences, legal education and judicial career paths in national judges’ assessment regarding EU law knowledge. Journal of European Public Policy 21(8), 1120–1141.Google Scholar
Mayoral, JA and Pérez, AT (2018) On judicial mobilization: entrepreneuring for policy change in times of crisis. Journal of European Integration 40(6), 719–736.Google Scholar
Moustafa, T (2007a) The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moustafa, T (2007b) Mobilising the Law in an Authoritarian State: The Legal Complex in Contemporary Egypt. In Halliday, TC, Karpik, L and Feeley, M (eds), The Legal Complex and Struggles for Political Liberalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 193–218.Google Scholar
Moustafa, T (2014) Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10, 281–299.Google Scholar
National Judicial Council (2024) Handó Tünde folytatja a bírói önigazgatás támadását, Handó Tünde folytatja a bírói önigazgatás támadását. Available at https://obt-jud.hu/.Google Scholar
Bírói Tanács, Országos (2024a) International Relations. Available at: https://obt-jud.hu/nemzetkozi-kapcsolatok.Google Scholar
Bírói Tanács, Országos (2024b) Legislative Processes. Available at https://obt-jud.hu/jogalkotas.Google Scholar
Pavone, T (2022) The Ghostwriters: Lawyers and the Politics behind the Judicial Construction in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pech, L, Wachowiec, P and Mazur, D (2021) Poland Rule of Law Breakdown: A Five-Year Assessment of EU In(Action). Hague Journal of the Rule of Law 13(1), 1–43.Google Scholar
Puelo, L and Coman, R (2024) Explaining judges’ opposition when judicial independence in undermined: insights from Poland, Romania, and Hungary. Democratization 31(1), 47–69.Google Scholar
Sadurski, W (2019) Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sajó, A (2021) Ruling by Cheating, Governance in Illiberal Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheppele, KL (2018) Autocratic Legalism. University of Chicago Law Review 85, 545–583.Google Scholar
Scheppele, KL, Kochenov, D and Grabowska-Moroz, B (2021) EU Values Are Law, after All: Enforcing EU Values through Systemic Infringement Actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union. Yearbook of European Law 2020 39, 3–121.Google Scholar
Sessa, D, Marquies, F and Morijn, J (2023) The Action Bought by the European Organisations of Judges against the Council of the European Union over the release of EU Recovery and Resilience Funds to Poland. Journal of Constitutional History 45, 1.Google Scholar
Társadalom a Szabadságjogokért (TASZ) (2021) Jogellenesen akadályozta egy bíró áthelyezését Handó Tünde. Available at: https://tasz.hu/cikkek/jogellenesen-akadalyozta-egy-biro-athelyezeset-hando-tunde.Google Scholar
Themis (2023) Materials in English. Available at: http://themis-sedziowie.eu/category/materials-in-english/.Google Scholar
Tokson, M (2015) Judicial Resistance and Legal change. University of Chicago Law Review 82(2), 901–973.Google Scholar
Uitz, R (2019) The Perils of Defending the Rule of Law Through Dialogue. European Constitutional Law Review 15.Google Scholar
Vanhala, L (2012) Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK. 46 Law and Society Review 46(3), 523–526.Google Scholar
Vanhala, L (2017) Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland and Italy. Comparative Political Studies.Google Scholar
Vauchez, A (2013) Communities of International Litigators. In Cesare Romano, PR, Alterand, KJ and Avgerou, C (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Voeten, E (2020) Populism and Backlashes against International Courts. Perspectives on Politics 18(2), 407–422.Google Scholar
Zabłudowska, D (2022) The Battle for Judicial Independence in Poland. In Sunnqvist M, Groussot X and Maunsbach L Special Issue: Rule of Law and Rechtsstaat. Historical and Procedural Perspectives. Journal of Constitutional History 44, 2.Google Scholar