Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:41:40.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public law, knowledge and explanation: a critique on the facilitative nature of public law analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2007

Barbara Mauthe
Barbara Mauthe*
Affiliation:
Law School, Lancaster University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine why public law is able to incorporate political theory but excludes feminist critiques. In order to achieve this goal a form of discourse analysis will be undertaken using epistemological and scientific perceptions of knowledge and explanation. This approach is both unusual and unique but will illustrate some of the exclusionary suppositions which underpin analysis within public law. The paper will conclude that only by adopting an alternative starting point for analysis, such as the use of concepts, will public law be able to incorporate alternative and critical approaches.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 377 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayer, Alfred (1956) The Problem of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Black, Julia (1997) Rules and Regulators. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottomley, Anne (2000) ‘Theory is a Process Not the End: A Feminist Approach to the Practice of Theory’ in Richardson, J. and Sandland, R. (eds.) Feminist Perspectives on Law and Theory. London: Cavendish Publishing.Google Scholar
Cane, Peter (2003) ‘Theory and Values in Public Law’ in Craig, P. P. and Rawlings, R. (eds.) Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Alan (1999) What is This Thing called Science (3rd edn). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Chrisholm, Roderick (1957) Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Joanne (2000) ‘Revisiting the Feminist Theoretical Project’, Journal of Law and Society 27(3): 351.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina (1998) Governing Out of Order. London: Rivers Oram Press.Google Scholar
Cornwell, John (ed.) (2004) Explanations: Styles of Explanation in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Paul P. (2003) ‘Theory and Values in Public Law: A Response’ in Craig, P. P. and Rawlings, R. (eds.) Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Paul P. and Rawlings, Richard (eds.) (2003) Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Susan (1996) Sex and Gender in the Legal Process. London: Blackstone PressGoogle Scholar
Gallie, William (1956) ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56:167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettier, Edmund (1963) ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge’, Analysis 23: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. (1983) ‘Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Science’, American Sociological Review 48 (December): 781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin (1967) ‘A Causal Theory of Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 64: 335–72.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation, and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank (1998) From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Mark (1985) ‘It’s not what you know that counts’, Journal of Philosophy 82: 350–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip S. (1990) ‘Explanatory Unification and Causal Structure of the World’ in Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W. (eds.) Scientific Explanation: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Vol. XIII, pp. 410–506.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1977) The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola (1998) Unspeakable Subjects. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith and Paxson, Thomas (1969) ‘Knowledge: Undefeated Justified True Belief’, The Journal of Philosophy 66: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, Martin (1989) ‘Law, Ideologies and the Political-Administrative System’, Journal of Law and Society 16(1): 21.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin (2003) The Idea of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin (2005) ‘Theory and Values in Public Law: An Interpretation’, Public Law Spring: 48.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, Catherine (1987) Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, Catherine (1989) Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mauthe, Barbara (1999) ‘District Auditors and Decision Making in the Central-Local Government Relationship’, Anglo-American Law Review 28: 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauthe, Barbara (2000) ‘The Notion of Rules and Rule-Making in the Central-Local Government Relationship’, Anglo-American Law Review 29: 315.Google Scholar
Mauthe, Barbara (2005) ‘The Notion of Sovereignty and its Presentation within Public Law: A Critique on the use of Theory and Concepts’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 56: 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauthe, Barbara (2005a) ‘A Critique on Legal Analysis on Local Government and the Central-Local Relationship’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 56: 373.Google Scholar
Milns, Susan and Whitty, Noel (eds.) (1999) Feminist Perspectives on Public Law. London: Cavendish Publishing.Google Scholar
Naffine, Ngaire (1990) Law and the Sexes. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda J. (ed.) (1990) Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’donovan, Katherine (1985) Sexual Divisions in Law: Explorations in Feminist Jurisprudence. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Ogus, Anthony I. (1994), Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’hear, Anthony (1989) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Paul and Putnam, Hilary (1958) ‘The Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis’ in Feigl, H., Scriven, M. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) Concepts, Theories and the Mind-Body Problem: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II, pp. 3–36. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. (1969) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. (1972) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. (1979) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Lisa H. (1999) ‘Liberal Rights Theory and Social In equality: A Feminist Critique’, Hypatia. 14(2): 26–47.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol (1989) Feminism and the Power of the Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol (1992) ‘The Woman of Legal Discourse’, Social and Legal Studies. 1: 29.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul (1992) Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent-jones, Peter (1998) ‘Responsive Law and Governance in Public Service Provision: A Future for the Local Contracting State’, Modern Law Review 61(3): 362.Google Scholar
Vincent-jones, Peter (1999) ‘The Regulation of Contractualisation of Quasi-Markets for Public Services’, Public Law Summer: 304.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil (2002) ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, Modern Law Review 65: 317.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil (2003) ‘Late Sovereignty in the European Union’ in Walker, N. (ed.) Sovereignty in Transition. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Weitz, Morris (1998) Theories of Concepts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2000) Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar