Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:57:14.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pre-trial detention and legal defence in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2021

Gustavo Fondevila Open the ORCID record for Gustavo Fondevila [Opens in a new window]  and
Miguel Quintana-Navarrete
Gustavo Fondevila*
Affiliation:
Center for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE), Mexico City, Mexico
Miguel Quintana-Navarrete
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pre-trial detention is used extensively in Latin America as a systematic practice implemented by courts. Despite this fact, few empirical studies have analysed the role of defence attorneys in pre-trial incarceration. This paper attempts to describe the actions taken by lawyers in order to free their clients during the judicial process, using new empirical evidence collected from the incarcerated population in Argentina, Brazil, El Salvador, Chile, Mexico and Peru. Results suggest that public defenders request conditional release less frequently but do so more effectively than their private counterparts.

Keywords

pre-trial detentionlegal defenceLatin American criminal courts
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 17 , Special Issue 1: Celebration of Peter Fitzpatrick and his Scholarship , March 2021 , pp. 75 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahumada, A, Farren, D and Williamson, B (2013) Los costos de la prisión preventiva en Chile. Santiago: Paz Ciudadana.Google Scholar
Arango, MI (2010) A propósito del papel de juez de control de garantías en la audiencia de formulación e imputación. Revista Nuevo Foro Penal 6, 231–242.Google Scholar
Arias, ED (2017) Criminal politics: illicit activities and governance in Latin America and the Caribbean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ávila, R (2009) Anteproyecto de código de garantías penales. Quito: Ministerio de justicia y derechos humanos.Google Scholar
Ávila, R (2013) La (in)justicia penal en la democracia constitucional de derechos. Quito: Ediciones Legales.Google Scholar
Axat, J (2008) La prisión preventiva y el confinamiento de niños pobres en institutos de menores ‘en crisis‘. Prisma Jurídico 7, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beato, C (2012) Crimes e cidades. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.Google Scholar
Bergman, B and Kessler, G (2008) Vulnerabilidad al delito y sentimiento de inseguridad en Buenos Aires: determinantes y consecuencias. Desarrollo Económico 48, 209–234.Google Scholar
Bergman, M (2018) More Money More Crime: Prosperity and Rising Crime in Latin America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, C and La, Rota M (2013) Independencia judicial insuficiente, prisión preventiva deformada. Informe Colombia. In various authors, Independencia judicial insuficiente, prisión preventiva deformada. Washington: DPLF, pp. 65–113.Google Scholar
Bischoff, JL (2003) Reforming the criminal procedure system in Latin America. Texas Hispanic Journal of Law & Policy 9, 35–42.Google Scholar
Blanco, R (2010) La reforma procesal penal, variables asociadas a la planificación técnico y política del cambio. In various authors, A 10 años de la reforma procesal penal: los desafíos del nuevo sistema. Santiago: Ministerio de Justicia, pp. 97–122.Google Scholar
Bulman, P, García, M and Hernon, J (2012) Study raises questions about psychological effects of solitary confinement. NIJ Journal 269, 4–7.Google Scholar
Buromensky, MV, Serduk, OV and Tocheny, VI (2008) Assessment of Social and Economic Costs of Pretrial Detention Application: Analytical Report. Kyiv: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Calderón, F (2011) La impunidad daña severamente la estabilidad. México: CNN. Available at http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2011/09/07/calderon-a-los-jueces-laimpunidad-dana-severamente-la-estabilidad (accessed 26 December 2020).Google Scholar
Carranza, E (2009) Cárcel y justicia penal: el modelo de derechos y obligaciones de las Naciones Unidas, y una política integral de seguridad de los habitantes frente al delito. In Carranza, E (ed.), Cárcel y justicia penal en América Latina y el Caribe. México: Siglo XXI, pp. 53–126.Google Scholar
Carranza, E (2012) Situación penitenciaria en América Latina y el Caribe: ¿qué hacer? Chile: anuario-cdh. Available at www.anuariocdh.uchile.cl (accessed 15 December 2020).Google Scholar
Cavise, LL (2007) The transition from the inquisitorial to the accusatorial system of trial procedure: why some Latin American lawyers hesitate. Wayne Law Review 53, 785.Google Scholar
Cerruti, P (2013) Seguridad pública y neoconservadurismo en la Argentina neoliberal: la construcción social de la ‘inseguridad‘ durante los años noventa: ‘combate a la delincuencia‘, ‘tolerancia cero‘ y ‘mano dura’. Revista de Sociología e Política 21, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J and Henry, DA (1996) The Pretrial Release Decision Making Process: Goals, Current Practices and Challenges. Washington: Pretrial Services Resource Center.Google Scholar
Clark, S and Kurtz, S (1983) The importance of interim decisions to felony trial court dispositions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 74, 476–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clear, T (2008) The effects of high imprisonment rates on communities. Crime & Justice 37, 97–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbert, DL, Paternoster, R and Bushway, S (2001) Do attorneys really matter: the empirical and legal case for the right of counsel at bail. Cardozo Law Review 23, 1719.Google Scholar
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH) (2001) Quinto informe sobre la situación de los derechos humanos en Guatemala (OEA/Ser.L/V/II.111). Available at http://www.oas.org/es/cidh/informes/pais.asp (accessed 20 January 2021).Google Scholar
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH) (2011) Informe anual 2011 (OEA/Ser.L/V/II). Available at http://www.oas.org/es/cidh/informes/pais.asp (accessed 20 January 2021).Google Scholar
Coyle, A (2003) A human rights approach to prison management. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 13, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crijns, JH, Leeuw, BJ and Wermink, HT (2016) Pre-trial Detention in the Netherlands: Legal Principles versus Practical Reality. Leiden: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
Dammert, L (2012) Fear of Crime in Latin America: Redefining State-society Relations. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dammert, L and Salazar, F (2009) ¿Duros con el delito? Populismo e inseguridad en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Dávalos, P (2014) Alianza país o la reinvención del poder. Quito: Ediciones desde abajo.Google Scholar
Devers, L (2011) Bail Decision Making: Research Summary. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.Google Scholar
Dewey, M (2015) El orden clandestino. Buenos Aires: Katz Editores.Google Scholar
Dressler, J (1996) Understanding Criminal Procedure. New York: Bender.Google Scholar
Dubber, M (2004) Toward a constitutional law of crime and punishment. Hastings Law Journal 55, 1–77.Google Scholar
Duce, M, Fuentes, C and Riego, C (2009) La reforma procesal penal en América Latina y su impacto en el uso de la prisión preventiva: Prisión preventiva y reforma procesal penal en América Latina: Evaluación y Perspectivas. CEJA-JSCA, 13–73.Google Scholar
Fajnzylber, F (1983) La industrialización trunca de América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Ferrajoli, L (1990) Diritto e ragione: teoria del garantismo penale. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Field, S (1994) Judicial supervision and the pre-trial process. Journal of Law and Society 21, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frandsen, BR, Lefgren, LJ and Leslie, EC (2019) Judging Judge Fixed Effects. Technical report (No. w25528). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, CE and Bishop, DM (1985) Pretrial detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 76, 1132–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, MC (2010) Régimen de prisión preventiva en América Latina: la pena anticipada, la lógica cautelar y la contrarreforma. Sistemas Judiciales 1, 34–45.Google Scholar
Garland, D (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudin, A (2011) Overcrowding Causes Regional Crisis in Penitentiary System. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico (UNM), Business Insights.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M and Gottfredson, D (1990) Decision Making in Criminal Justice: Toward the Rational Exercise of Discretion. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, M (1977) Paternalism, prevention, and punishment: pretrial detention of juveniles. New York University Law Review 52, 1064–1092.Google Scholar
Hafetz, JL (2002) Pretrial detention, human rights, and judicial reform in Latin America. Fordham International Law Journal 26, 1753–1777.Google Scholar
Holman, B and Ziedenberg, J (2006) The Dangers of Detention: The Impact of Incarcerating Youth in Detention and Other Secure Facilities. Washington: Justice Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Iturralde, M (2010) Democracies without citizenship: crime and punishment in Latin America. New Criminal Law Review: In International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13, 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostenwein, E (2015) Pretrial detention: between the media and political authorities. Revista Direito e Práxis 6, 54–79.Google Scholar
Kramer, GM, Wolbransky, M and Heilbrun, K (2007) Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: evidence strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 25, 573–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langer, M (2007) Revolution in Latin American criminal procedure: diffusion of legal ideas from the periphery. American Journal of Comparative Law 55, 617–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R (2011) Una propuesta realista de reforma para las prisiones en Latinoamérica. Política Criminal 6, 296–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConville, M et al. (1994) Standing accused: the organisation and practice of criminal defence lawyers in Britain. Cambridge Law Journal 53, 389–389.Google Scholar
Meyer, HH (1972) Constitutionality of pretrial detention. Georgetown Law Journal 60, 1381–1474.Google Scholar
Mitchell, JN (1969) Bail reform and the constitutionality of pretrial detention. Virginia Law Review 55, 1223–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization of American States (OAS) (2012) Políticas penitenciarias y carcelarias. Available at http://www.oas.org/dsp/espanol/cpo_actividades_carceles.asp (accessed 28 November 2020).Google Scholar
Pásara, L (2013) La prisión preventiva y el ejercicio de la independencia judicial. In various authors, Independencia judicial insuficiente, prisión preventiva deformada. Washington: DPLF, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Pastor, D (1993) El encarcelamiento preventivo. In various authors, El nuevo código procesal penal de la nación. Buenos Aires: Del Puerto, pp. 48–62.Google Scholar
Phillips, M (2004) Factors Influencing Release and Bail Decisions in New York City. New York: Criminal Justice Agency.Google Scholar
Pinto, R (2007) Los motivos que justifican la prisión preventiva en la jurisprudencia extranjera. Revista Latinoamericana de derecho 4, 305–337.Google Scholar
Poblete, O (2010) Reforma procesal penal: notas sobre el nacimiento de la presunción de inocencia. In various authors, A 10 años de la reforma procesal penal: los desafíos del nuevo sistema. Santiago: Ministerio de Justicia, pp. 137–160.Google Scholar
Pontón-Cevallos, J (2016) ‘Mano dura‘ en Guayaquil: medios, inseguridad y populismo punitivo ‘strike hard‘ in Guayaquil: media, insecurity and punitive populism. Razón y palabra 20, 186–203.Google Scholar
Rengifo, AF et al. (2019) Trato procesal y uso de la detención preventiva en una muestra de audiencias de control de garantías en Bogotá y Cali. Cuadernos de Economía 38, 581–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, J (2002) Mediating preferences: litigant preferences for process and judicial preferences for settlement. Journal of Dispute Resolution 155–169.Google Scholar
Riego, C (2012) Una nueva agenda para la prisión preventiva en América Latina. Sistemas Judiciales 7, 6–11.Google Scholar
Riego, C and Duce, M (2009 ) Prisión preventiva y reforma procesal penal en América Latina. Santiago: CEJA.Google Scholar
Robertson, O (2007) The Impact of Parental Imprisonment on Children. Geneva: United Nations Office.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, L (2010) Prisión preventiva, populismo punitivo y protección de los derechos humanos en el sistema interamericano In Llobet RJ and Durán D (eds), Política criminal en el Estado social de Derecho. San José: Jurídica Continental, pp. 183–219.Google Scholar
Sozzo, M (2015) ¿Más allá del neoliberalismo? Cambio político y penalidad en América del Sur. Cuadernos Del Pensamiento Crítico Latinoamericano 23, 1–4.Google Scholar
Sozzo, M (ed.) (2016) Postneoliberalismo y penalidad en América del Sur. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
Spohn, C (2008) Race, sex, and pretrial detention in federal court: indirect effects and cumulative disadvantage. University of Kansas Law Review 57, 879–901.Google Scholar
Stevens, L (2013) The meaning of the presumption of innocence for pretrial detention: an empirical approach. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 2013, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teplin, LA et al. (2002) Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry 59, 1133–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiede, LB (2012) Chile's criminal law reform: enhancing defendants rights and citizen security. Latin American Politics and Society 54, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukame, SA (2016) El rol de los medios de comunicación en la construcción de discursos en la ‘guerra contra la delincuencia juvenil‘ en Chile (1990–2016). Polis, Revista Latinoamericana 15, 1–17.Google Scholar
Ungar, M (2003) Prisons and politics in contemporary Latin America. Human Rights Quarterly 25, 909–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, J (2011) Presumir responsabilidad: sobre una relación entre la prisión preventiva y la presunción de inocencia en el Derecho procesal chileno. Revista de Estudios de la Justicia 14, 53–70.Google Scholar
Vera Institute of Justice (2002) Analizando la reforma a la justicia criminal en Chile: un estudio empírico. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Vilalta, C (2010) El miedo al crimen en México: estructura lógica, bases empíricas y recomendaciones iniciales de política pública. Gestión y Política Pública XIX, 3–36.Google Scholar
Vilalta, C (2015) Tendencias y proyecciones globales en la violencia homicida: 2000 a 2030. Brasil: Instituto Igarapé. Available at https://igarape.org.br/outras-publicacoes (accessed 15 December 2020).Google Scholar
Vintimilla, J and Villacís, G (2013) Independencia judicial insuficiente, prisión preventiva deformada. In various authors, Independencia judicial insuficiente, prisión preventiva deformada. Washington: DPLF, pp. 115–145.Google Scholar
Walter, S (1993) Taming the System: The Control of Discretion in Criminal Justice 1950–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, GR and Wheeler, CL (1980) Reflections on legal representation of the economically disadvantaged: beyond assembly line justice type of counsel, pretrial detention, and outcomes in Houston. Crime & Delinquency 26, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, MR (2003) The effect of pretrial detention on imprisonment decisions. Criminal Justice Review 28, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrell, C (1985) Pretrial detention of juveniles: denial of equal protection masked by the parens patriae doctrine. Yale Law Journal 95, 174–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaffaroni, E (1988) Manual de Derecho penal. México: Cárdenas.Google Scholar
Zepeda, LG (2010) ¿Cuánto cuesta la prisión sin condena? Costos económicos y sociales de la prisión preventiva en México. Mexico: Open Society Foundation.Google Scholar